H Holy-diver Well-known member Feb 23, 2017 #21 ejecta":1irvtpl1 said: In a nut shell the AxeFX 2 sounds realer than the Ultra which sounded real. Click to expand... this
ejecta":1irvtpl1 said: In a nut shell the AxeFX 2 sounds realer than the Ultra which sounded real. Click to expand... this
crankyrayhanky Well-known member Feb 24, 2017 #22 Steinmetzify":kutlyz7t said: HUGE differences, man. Honestly, if you just want the FX, grab the FX8, run it 4cm and you'll be good. Click to expand... +1 I think they are (or were?) on sale for like 999 new
Steinmetzify":kutlyz7t said: HUGE differences, man. Honestly, if you just want the FX, grab the FX8, run it 4cm and you'll be good. Click to expand... +1 I think they are (or were?) on sale for like 999 new
romanianreaper Well-known member Feb 24, 2017 #23 When Cliff came out with the "Quantum" update, it was a huge step in the right direction. I can't even imagine going back to those initial tones.
When Cliff came out with the "Quantum" update, it was a huge step in the right direction. I can't even imagine going back to those initial tones.
Bishop5150 Well-known member Feb 24, 2017 #24 I would recommend the FX8 if your just wanting the FX. I had it but once I got the AX8 it was pointless to have both. But if your looking to dabble with the amp modeling definitely get the Axe II. Or perhaps like mentioned above get the AX8.
I would recommend the FX8 if your just wanting the FX. I had it but once I got the AX8 it was pointless to have both. But if your looking to dabble with the amp modeling definitely get the Axe II. Or perhaps like mentioned above get the AX8.