Bondi refuses to answer lawmakers’ questions about Trump’s involvement in Epstein files release

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alpha Stryke
  • Start date Start date
The law may seem like magic to certain folks like yourself, of low IQ....

"Under New York law (Penal Law § 175.10), falsification escalates to a felony if the intent to defraud includes an "intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". In Trump’s case, prosecutors successfully argued to the grand jury and trial jury that the records were falsified to conceal a violation of federal campaign finance laws and state election laws, justifying the escalated penalty."

That case was bullshit and you know it.
 

A link to an 'article' that essentially has 2 sentences on the matter.

Let me see if I can summarize this in a way that makes more sense. The whole thing stems from when Trump supposedly had sex with a porn star before he was in politics. Then he supposedly gave Michael Cohen money in 2017 to give the porn star for her to keep quiet. The prosecution claimed 34 individual pieces of evidence for their felony elevations to the normally otherwise white collar misdemeanor . They presented their evidence in the form of the 11 payments totaling $130,000. 11 invoices, 11 checks, and 12 ledger entries.
(11+11+12=34)
That seems somewhat pathetic to me, but I see why people might not like him for that. Thing is, even if he had sex with a consenting adult 10 years ago, that is between him and Melania imo. I certainly wouldn't call it election fraud. Trump claims he never had that encounter with her and the money to Cohen was in regard to a nondisclosure agreement. Hence the ongoing appeal.

Its kind of like Bill Clinton saying in a deposition that he didn't have sexual relations with intern Monica Lewinsky. He only got blowjobs from her and stuck his cigar in that 22 year old's pussy while in the Oval Office. Not. :dunno:
 
You found that funny huh, @JDs Couch ?

Go back and read the 2 sentence article you posted as a factual source and then juxtapose that to my summary :dunno:

Or were you laughing at my Bill Clinton comment?
 
Back
Top