CDC widens early virus detection surveillance at airports

[Dan Gleesak]

No agenda, just critical analysis. I’m saying that, for example, if you have a test that shows high rates of a virus, but nobody was actually sick, then so what?

Then we know that the virus is in the community but not making people sick. You don’t see the value in knowing that compared to just thinking no one is sick?

 

[Bad Brain]

Then we know that the virus is in the community but not making people sick. You don’t see the value in knowing that compared to just thinking no one is sick?

Sure, there’s value to the extent people are objectively and soberly looking at the data, and it’s not simply being used to further an agenda. I’m not holding my breath though, because COVID has been hyped, if not by scientists, by media, pharma and politicians every chance they get.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Sure, there’s value to the extent people are objectively and soberly looking at the data, and it’s not simply being used to further an agenda. I’m not holding my breath though, because COVID has been hyped, if not by scientists, by media, pharma and politicians every chance they get.

Sure, but I also said the same exact thing earlier today. Separate the science from the agenda. It’s like they can’t win ya know? People come up with a way to track an infectious disease without singling anyone out, shoving a qtip up their nose, or having to miss work, and people are still shitting over it (pun intended). The hate has nothing to do with the discussion at hand