I love the smooth 65, not as bright as the 75 but 75s seems fatter or punchier. I ended up with Redback /V30(UK)Yeah, they definitely have more cut.
I really liked the smoothness of the M65's.
Cant go wrong with either speaker.
I love the smooth 65, not as bright as the 75 but 75s seems fatter or punchier. I ended up with Redback /V30(UK)Yeah, they definitely have more cut.
I really liked the smoothness of the M65's.
Cant go wrong with either speaker.
It was the other way around in my experience. The 75's were all treble and no bass.I love the smooth 65, not as bright as the 75 but 75s seems fatter or punchier. I ended up with Redback /V30(UK)
It really depends on the cabinet, your rig, and your target tone but in general I'd say no. I always thought the H75 Creamback had a lot of big bottom end as well as a lot of top end and sounded 'big' in a 2x12.Do you guys think that light magnet speakers like the M65 or similar speakers from Scumback have enough low end or bigness for a 212 cab?
I can see what you mean. I ditched both.It was the other way around in my experience. The 75's were all treble and no bass.
Interesting take...I actually find the M magnet speakers have more low-end. H magnets tend to have the low end voiced lower than their M magnet equivalents, so they may come off as more hi-fi and tighter, but in sheer amount, M magnets are usually fatter because they have more high lows and low mids. Plus the H's tend to be like A LOT brighter in the highs as well.
At least that has been my experience comparing the Celestion Anniversary and the Greenback RI, and the Creamback M's and H's.
The Celestion Anniversary honestly is just plain unusable for me with high-gain because of that.
I do like Creamback M's a lot, but I prefer EVH's and especially, non-Heritage Greenback RI's. I just like how raspy and full of character they get when they're pushed a little.Yes they are a departure for me from a lot of Celestions. Hence why I like them so much. They even blend well with my Mesa V30s. They work well with the M65s as well.
Thanks for the explaination as well, my friend. Appreciate it.
Sounds like you are a Creamback fan. What style of music do you play?
That's a great combo right there.I love the smooth 65, not as bright as the 75 but 75s seems fatter or punchier. I ended up with Redback /V30(UK)
I honestly think the Marshall V30's are more closely related to the Mesa ones than to the Chinese. The only difference is that we mostly see Marshall 16 ohms and Mesa 8 ohms, so yeah, the Mesas are bound to be smoother. I bet that if we compare Mesa 16 ohms, they'd be closer than what we all would think.I like v30s, Redbacks, m65, H75 but it really depends on the amp, cab, playing style, genre. Loved the m65 with the Splawn I had, hated it with ksr orthos. Love the redbacks but I don't really care for them with my mark iv etc.
The Marshall v30s are delicious. I know there isn't supposed to be a huge difference to the regular v30 but to me they sounded more pleasant to my ears(not as harsh)
I think so too. I think if we compared ohms and country of origin I bet it's closer as well. I don't know. My KSR 2x12 with V30s doesn't have that harshness that I experienced with the orange 2x12 I had. The Marshall 1936v was a similar experience.I honestly think the Marshall V30's are more closely related to the Mesa ones than to the Chinese. The only difference is that we mostly see Marshall 16 ohms and Mesa 8 ohms, so yeah, the Mesas are bound to be smoother. I bet that if we compare Mesa 16 ohms, they'd be closer than what we all would think.
I was a V30 guy until I tried a Cream 90. You're right, they are out of this world. Best sounding speaker I've found either ceramic or alnico.Yup... love 'em. The ONLY reason I don't use them anymore is because I ran into the Alnico Creams (which are much more expensive) and they are out of this world. Until that moment, I thought 65's were the best I had heard. They would pair just fine with the V30.
I hear what you are saying. My M65s sound very fat with big round lows.I actually find the M magnet speakers have more low-end. H magnets tend to have the low end voiced lower than their M magnet equivalents, so they may come off as more hi-fi and tighter, but in sheer amount, M magnets are usually fatter because they have more high lows and low mids. Plus the H's tend to be like A LOT brighter in the highs as well.
At least that has been my experience comparing the Celestion Anniversary and the Greenback RI, and the Creamback M's and H's.
The Celestion Anniversary honestly is just plain unusable for me with high-gain because of that.