V
Thanks for posting. I have to agree with you here, it's a big problem. There are many false teachers in the latter days, the latter days beginning in the time of Christ and the apostles. Schismatics and heretics began almost immediately spreading wrong teachings, hence the ecumenical councils being held to root out false teachers and wrong theology. Other people spin those in a negative light, as being the point where Christ's teachings were corrupted, however.....I believe that exact sentiment is lending a major hand in giving Christianity a bad name right now. While I still haven’t come to my own conclusions about the meaning of the word “Satan”*, if we just use the term anti-Christ in it’s place for now, I’d argue that sentiment is the work of the anti-Christ because it only excuses you to fall away from Him.
Thanks for posting. I have to agree with you here, it's a big problem. There are many false teachers in the latter days, the latter days beginning in the time of Christ and the apostles. Schismatics and heretics began almost immediately spreading wrong teachings, hence the ecumenical councils being held to root out false teachers and wrong theology. Other people spin those in a negative light, as being the point where Christ's teachings were corrupted, however.....
Nowadays, you don't like what one church teaches, just go find or start one that "feels good" to you....there is no humility there. There is no "hey maybe the apostles and disciples DID pass the truth down, preserve it, and I should seek to subject myself to those teachings". 250+ denominations later....In essence it implies that there is no true church...no true teaching, and suggests that satan has actually won the battle since there is no finding the real answers. A world awash in confusion aka babel/babble. But it's not so.
The church and all that Christ taught is preserved unconquerable forever. Most will reject this premise because it is not what they want to, or are not spiritually ready, to hear: it is preserved in the eastern orthodox church, which is both catholic (meaning universal) and apostolic. It exists pre-denominationally, meaning, there were no denominations prior to it, as it was ONE church with ONE teaching. To this day, we commune from ONE cup. Historically this is confirmed because the oldest christian churches found in the archaeological record are all orthodox.
Please note that this isn't a condemnation or judgement of those outside orthodoxy, but are rather theological and historical facts one must contend with when comparing it to more modern sects and other statements of faiths. Many non-orthodox faiths, the better protestant ones, and much of pre-vatican II roman catholicism, for example, hold theological viewpoints almost identical to those of the orthodox church but omit or deny what orthodoxy includes in smaller ways. Reverence for the mother of Christ or iconography would be two examples.
Satan translates to "accuser" or "adversary" and is different than strictly "anti-christ" as that is anyone or anything that stands in opposition to Christ whether it's an occult object or a person. "There are many antichrists...."1 John 2:18
In eastern orthodoxy (and most of christianity) lucifer is the original name for satan. He was the highest of the angels. He was leader of worship in heaven, all of which is liturgical, meaning it is chanted or sung, as is all orthodox liturgy today. So he is a most skillful musician. His sin that caused him to be cast from heaven is pride, which something at the root of many sins, and something we all must struggle with to some degree, every day. Luke 9:23 "....take up your cross DAILY..." (caps mine) which stands in opposition to "saved" teachings.
The saints I've shared in this thread....the whole point of an ascetic, devoted, monastic life is full time service and endless repentance for one's sins. The stories of their lives are recorded in the synaxarion, for our benefit and spiritual growth. There is no past tense in orthodoxy. There is no "saved". Saved implies nothing further needs be done, and that is very much a satanic lie. If "saved" were true theologically then there is actually no real good reason to even attend church on sunday, or do anything else, because it's already decided. This makes walking away from prayer, fasting, sacraments, a church life, devotion, or any other Godly thing seem logical if one ascribes to that viewpoint, which is part of the reason many people have walked away.
Hopefully I haven't come across too aggressively in my wording but sharing and clarifying is one of the chief spiritual works of mercy, so I am obligated to share it with you, since you brought it up. Here is an interesting video from Father Spyridon which details better what I tried to lay out if you care to view it and I'm always happy to discuss this further with you or others, here or in private. It's a journey and I am glad to see you pursuing the narrow pathway Drew. May we both find it. Blessings.
I haven't come across Wes Huff. To be completely honest I'm firmly planted in orthodoxy now, which is massively challenging in ways that I don't want to get into here because they might not make sense and could be taken out of context by others who might be reading. But you mentioning the "saved" stuff some others had confronted you with....the thought of that being a core to someone's theological understanding is pretty ridiculous to me. It's the antithesis of what is scriptural.Too funny,
The last thing I wrote in my journal last night was Luke 13:24, narrow it shall be!
I take no offense whatsoever, if anything I'm quite certain the last 43 years went down the way they did to ensure I would 'dig until I find the root', along with a heavy amount of faith that humans will ruin things 100% of the time when left to their own devices, Mark 7:8-13 is a big point of focus.
Not sure if you've come across Wes Huff yet, but his knowledge of the Bible and the history surrounding it is remarkable. I've got a long, long way to go, but eventually I want to have the kind of recall around scripture on the level he does.