Cleans on a Naylor Duel and Friedman Naked

  • Thread starter Thread starter joshjoshjosh
  • Start date Start date
J

joshjoshjosh

New member
I was wondering if anybody had any experience with the clean channel on the Naylor and the Friedman Naked. I have a Naylor Duel 60 that I absolutely love. The clean channel leaves a lot to be desired. I was wondering if the Naked clean channel was much better. The Naylor clean always sounds better with a pedal on front it. Tightens things up. Appreciate any info.
 
I’ve had quite a few Friedman’s and the only clean I would say comes close to the Duel 60 (great amp) would be the Dirty Shirley/Twin Sister. Never tried the Buxom Betty tho. The Naked was an early Friedman, not many bought that amp for the clean channel
 
I’ve had quite a few Friedman’s and the only clean I would say comes close to the Duel 60 (great amp) would be the Dirty Shirley/Twin Sister. Never tried the Buxom Betty tho. The Naked was an early Friedman, not many bought that amp for the clean channel
Appreciate the feedback. Yeah I didn’t buy the Naylor for the clean channel. It’s pretty meh. Since the Naked and Duel are kissing cousins, I wondered if the clean channel on the Naked was improved. It seems to have the same amount of controls. Only a clean volume? I believe stock, the Duel only has Volume for the clean channel? Mine has the density rotary and bright switch for it as well. It makes it a little bit more manageable, but it doesn’t sound particularly good when messing with those.
 
Last edited:
I’ve also heard the Budda SuperDrive is another cousin to the Duel 60 and I did not find that to be true at all 🤷‍♂️

Anyway, since I’ve never had a Naked sorry I’m no help at all
 
I've had the Naked, and I have a Duel 100. They're the same thing. It's the simple clean Dave Friedman designed for Kyle Kurtz when Kyle owned Naylor.
Awesome. Exactly what I was hoping to hear. Pulled out some different guitars and messed with the Density and Bite in new positions. Sounded better. Appreciate it Dale!
 
I have Duel 60 and my issue with clean channel was almost impossible to get both channels equally volume wise. (no Density, only Bite). The circuit placement of clean channel volume before Master doesn't help at all and my solution was some light tweaks by my tech to lower clean channel signal and now it works great. Absolutely no need for EQing, just plug-in great guitar without high output pickups.
 
I have Duel 60 and my issue with clean channel was almost impossible to get both channels equally volume wise. (no Density, only Bite). The circuit placement of clean channel volume before Master doesn't help at all and my solution was some light tweaks by my tech to lower clean channel signal and now it works great. Absolutely no need for EQing, just plug-in great guitar without high output pickups.
Can you elaborate? What would I tell my tech to do? You’re absolutely right. The channels don’t balance right.
 
Last edited:
I have owned both. (I've actually owned 2 SD's, a OG Michigan and a newer one. I've owned 3 Friedman Nakeds, a 2012 100w, a 2018 Naked+, and my current one, an '83 2204 with a Naked mod -- the best sounding one.) The 2012 and 2018 Nakeds had clean channels. IMO, they're nothing special. About on par with the clean channel on the SD60, perhaps a bit brighter. FWIW, Billy Howerdel never uses the simple clean on his OG Naked; he just rolls back the volume on his neck pickup, with a treble bleed, and then uses the pickup selector on his LP as a clean/dirt.
 
I have owned both. (I've actually owned 2 SD's, a OG Michigan and a newer one. I've owned 3 Friedman Nakeds, a 2012 100w, a 2018 Naked+, and my current one, an '83 2204 with a Naked mod -- the best sounding one.) The 2012 and 2018 Nakeds had clean channels. IMO, they're nothing special. About on par with the clean channel on the SD60, perhaps a bit brighter. FWIW, Billy Howerdel never uses the simple clean on his OG Naked; he just rolls back the volume on his neck pickup, with a treble bleed, and then uses the pickup selector on his LP as a clean/dirt.
Appreciate you chiming in. I dig your YouTube channel. You definitely know what you’re talking about after owning all those variants. Interesting to hear that the 2204 Naked is your favorite. My Duel 60 is factory stock with EL34s. I haven’t had the chance to crank a SD60 with 5881s but a buddy who has played many Naylors said he liked mine best. My tech also had quite a few tube variants to try out with my amp. The EHX EL34s were the clear winner. Surely the Marshall transformers are contributing but there must also be something to the EL34s. Yeah check out that time stamp I posted above. This video is where my original post originated from. I’ll be asking Billy on Tone Talk this Friday was compressor(s) he was referring to.
 
This is a pretty good representation (not my video). I didn’t have a duel but I had an original sd60 Friedman modded with a simple clean which I believe is where the duel evolved from. This would be a fair example of how the clean on mine sounded.

That said I always A/B’d with a matchless or fender pro and never used the clean on my Naylor.

 
Appreciate you chiming in. I dig your YouTube channel. You definitely know what you’re talking about after owning all those variants. Interesting to hear that the 2204 Naked is your favorite. My Duel 60 is factory stock with EL34s. I haven’t had the chance to crank a SD60 with 5881s but a buddy who has played many Naylors said he liked mine best. My tech also had quite a few tube variants to try out with my amp. The EHX EL34s were the clear winner. Surely the Marshall transformers are contributing but there must also be something to the EL34s. Yeah check out that time stamp I posted above. This video is where my original post originated from. I’ll be asking Billy on Tone Talk this Friday was compressor(s) he was referring to.
Thanks man, I appreciate the views.

The Naked is simply the Naylor SD preamp into a Marshall 100w power section (w/ EL34's obv). So the two sound very close but the Naked is much brighter, more modern, and has more punch.

Dave clearly did some tweaks over the years, with some amps getting a SAT switch and a simple clean channel (like my 2012). My 2018 Naked+ was built on the BE-100 platform and had the four-gain-stage "plus" mode plus a clean channel with Treble and Bass controls. It felt like the negative feedback was increased on that one, too, as it was more compressed and less "raw" than my 2012.

The '83 2204, for whatever reason, is the simplest but best sounding one, though. Single channel, B/M/T, Presence, Master and Gain; that's it. I have two Hot Mods (the George Lynch one and the regular one that I put in it sometimes if I need that Naked+ gain and feel. Dave himself said he was very impressed with this one and said it was "particularly good." 🤷‍♂️ The 50w makes it break up a little earlier so you get more power amp saturation lower on the Master. It also smooths out the highs and makes the mids pop more than my others. (Note that I do tend to prefer 50w amps overall.) I'm going to do a video on it sometime soon.

I'm also planning on asking some questions when Billy is on TT this Friday. I actually met him in Arizona in 2022 when he was on his solo tour. We talked for quite some time about the Naked and his guitars. He was a really, really nice guy and came out just to chit-chat with all his fans.
 
Thanks man, I appreciate the views.

The Naked is simply the Naylor SD preamp into a Marshall 100w power section (w/ EL34's obv). So the two sound very close but the Naked is much brighter, more modern, and has more punch.

Dave clearly did some tweaks over the years, with some amps getting a SAT switch and a simple clean channel (like my 2012). My 2018 Naked+ was built on the BE-100 platform and had the four-gain-stage "plus" mode plus a clean channel with Treble and Bass controls. It felt like the negative feedback was increased on that one, too, as it was more compressed and less "raw" than my 2012.

The '83 2204, for whatever reason, is the simplest but best sounding one, though. Single channel, B/M/T, Presence, Master and Gain; that's it. I have two Hot Mods (the George Lynch one and the regular one that I put in it sometimes if I need that Naked+ gain and feel. Dave himself said he was very impressed with this one and said it was "particularly good." 🤷‍♂️ The 50w makes it break up a little earlier so you get more power amp saturation lower on the Master. It also smooths out the highs and makes the mids pop more than my others. (Note that I do tend to prefer 50w amps overall.) I'm going to do a video on it sometime soon.

I'm also planning on asking some questions when Billy is on TT this Friday. I actually met him in Arizona in 2022 when he was on his solo tour. We talked for quite some time about the Naked and his guitars. He was a really, really nice guy and came out just to chit-chat with all his fans.

I follow your YouTube channel too. There aren't many of us Naylor/Naked whores. HAHA!

The one I had was a '79 JMP 2203 (Same amp Billy had modded). I didn't really like it all that much compared to the SD 60's I had owned.

The first SD 60 I had was like Serial #12 or #13. It was one that was made before they made the stacked gain pot design. It was right after they changed the name of the amp from the Superdrive 50 to the Superdrive 60. The Duel and Electraverb Series didn't start until Kyle Kurtz took over. Joe Naylor basically said 'Kyle ran the business into the ground'.

Dave Friedman designed the simple clean and the channel switching for the Duel series. Guy Hedrick from Guytron designed the reverb circuit for the Electraverb.

Anyway, I sent that 2203 to Dave in May of 2008, and I got it back on New Years Eve of that year. He was a busy, busy man. That was a bit before he started producing any of his amps, and I think he had just started showing up over here on Rig-Talk. I think I actually messaged him over at Huge Racks INC. The way you describe the Naked is pretty much spot on. My Duel 100 is pretty close to it, but it's not as bright. The key to me is running V30's with them. That's the speaker that was stock before Joe had Eminence build the Naylor Special Design 50. That happened in '93 as well.

The SD50 speakers sounded good with the earliest version of the circuit before the stacked gain revision. It was a touch brighter, slightly thinner and had less of that thin blanket vibe. Running V30s makes them all sound closer that oldest version.

Anyway, I got into Naylors because of the band Sponge. I loved the tones on Rotting Pinata, but I later found they didn't use a Naylor when recording that album. It was a JCM 900 Dual Reverb for dirty and a Fender Twin for cleans. What got me was the low open C# Sponge and Billy used to hit. Sponge tuned down 1/2 a step in dropped D, and Billy has pretty much always been 1 1/2 steps down.

The Naked is more an amp for tuning down. It just holds together more.

Aside from the Sat switch, Dave has played with one of the values that made each variation a little different. He may have just used 2 different ones that weren't the stock Naylor value or he could've used 3 different ones which includes the Naylor one. I will have to find it on my external hard drive.

I have the specs for the original stock Naked lead channel. I woud love to build it one of these days when I have time or I may get someone to build it for me if my health doesn't permit it. It's not that far off from a 2203. I could care less about the clean on it.

The low input on a Superclub 38, Superdrive 60 and Superdrive 100 sounds way better than the simple clean. It's like a gritty clean with single coils and a light crunch with humbuckers.

I'm kind of all over the place right now. I've been having blood work done this past week to try to track down a problem I've been having. I had to go give a unit of blood earlier today, and I'm kind of weak. The doctor scared the hell out of me when he mentioned the possibility of cancer. I'm going back again this Friday for another test, and I may be giving another unit of blood then. Then, I have to go for 3 different screens next week, and one involves staying 24 hours at the hospital.

If you see me selling things before too much longer, you will know the reason why.
 
Frankly, the simple clean on either isn't the best.
I wouldn't waste $ getting a Duel Naylor vs Superdrive again, nor buy a Friedman with the simple clean channel, for the cleans.
The clean channel on the Friedman SS is darn close to my bf Dual Showman. It's a gem. The clean channel on the Runt 50 was surprisingly good, after having the BE and JJ.
The clean channel in the Budda SD18 came alive when the master volume got into the power tubes, rather flat at low volumes.
 
Back
Top