CNutz' Underboob Thread Deleted. WTF?

Talk about a huge waste of time and effort to "help" my fellow Rig Talkers. I'd posted 750 pics with more to follow.

It was not porn. No naughty bits exposed either. AFAIA every pic was well within the forum rules.

It'd be great if a mod could explain his reasoning; I'm concerned that the site is on a slippery slope towards going full-woke. :thumbsdown:
This is an off-topic forum for an elite elictric guitar and rig site. It is not, in essence, a place to dump hundreds of sexually suggestive photos of bimbos.

Pics of hot girl musicians will fly, as it is related and fun without being obscene.

That thread was basically a spank bank and does not in any way belong here.

I love ya bro and hope this reply doesn’t stick in the craw too bad. I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did.
 
No worries Nigel; I hear ya man. I was just bummed 'cause my efforts were well-intended as a (hopefully) fun eye-candy distraction for fellow Rig Talkers. I'm sure CNutz had this in mind when he created the thread too.

Bottom line is it was chicks in bikinis. No nipples and I even avoided cameltoe.

Far worse pics have been deemed kosher in the past here and weren't removed.
 
Rig-talk is really TGP now so why not go where there's far more info guitar related.
Not being provocative just stating the obvious.

In life today everything is a chain store all in plain vanilla & RT is no exception now, where's the small vendor offering a unique & exciting experience.

Ayn Rand is having a fit of rage in her grave today as it's gone exactly as she said it would.

Everyone is sold there are so many choices but we all now can see that's 100% BS.

Personal responsibility is not wanted or allowed today. Everyone must fall into line otherwise you're shunned or expelled.

2021 continues delivering asshole after asshole.
 
This is an off-topic forum for an elite elictric guitar and rig site. It is not, in essence, a place to dump hundreds of sexually suggestive photos of bimbos.

Pics of hot girl musicians will fly, as it is related and fun without being obscene.

That thread was basically a spank bank and does not in any way belong here.

I love ya bro and hope this reply doesn’t stick in the craw too bad. I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did.
You must work for the french fucks that own this forum and yes I just said that.
 
Spank bank, lol. Like someone’s gonna spank with monkey man watching from the side. Come on,It was total woke ass bullshit that got it removed.
trying to make RT like TGP. Only problem with TGP they shouldn’t have something called The Pub unless you can talk like you’re in a Pub.
 
Last edited:
Sex, drugs and rock 'n roll, innit? :cheers2:

So in OT we could try talkin' drugs seeing as sex was removed (not even sex, but you get the point).

Then what? if drugs are removed that leaves only R & R, which hardly requires an OT subforum on this site.

It just makes no sense to me. :confused:
 
If a person don’t like women they don’t have to look. They can look at Homosexual Superheroes. Why wasn’t that deleted? I’m sure that’s a spank bank for someone.
 
Personal responsibility is not wanted or allowed today. Everyone must fall into line otherwise you're shunned or expelled.
More personal responsibility is definitely wanted. Many people are acting like children. It isn't about falling in line. It is about being civil in a public forum.
 
Pics of hot girl musicians will fly, as it is related and fun without being obscene.
Honestly, I don't see the difference. You are either sexualizing a women or you aren't. Why should the fact she is a musician or holding a guitar make a difference? I'm down to see pictures of attractive women, but not sure this point should matter.
 
Well there you have it, folks. Straight from a mod's mouth. :rock:

If you're not married / don't have a girlfriend, why would you not want to look at pics of hot women who choose to pose, doing their best to look hot for a camera, with the express intention of attracting male attention? Heck even if you are married, many wifies don't care anyway.

These gals made the choice to cash in on it; you're just a consumer and the intended target. Who's exploiting who? Further to that, these women sexualised themselves, choosing to pose as objects of desire. Who's objectifying who? They're already-objectified by definition.

Sorry you missed the thread, Stoivo; I posted a shedload of vetted pics for all tastes and had a bucketload lined up for daily updates.

The fact that it was all deleted with no warning or explanation, is beyond the pale as far as I'm concerned. This is OTC at Rig Talk, after all. Most of those pics have been posted on instagram and facebook with no adult restrictions, FWIMBW. This is alarming to me.
 
Well there you have it, folks. Straight from a mod's mouth. :rock:

If you're not married / don't have a girlfriend, why would you not want to look at pics of hot women who choose to pose, doing their best to look hot for a camera, with the express intention of attracting male attention? Heck even if you are married, many wifies don't care anyway.

These gals made the choice to cash in on it; you're just a consumer and the intended target. Who's exploiting who? Further to that, these women sexualised themselves, choosing to pose as objects of desire. Who's objectifying who? They're already-objectified by definition.

Sorry you missed the thread, Stoivo; I posted a shedload of vetted pics for all tastes and had a bucketload lined up for daily updates.

The fact that it was all deleted with no warning or explanation, is beyond the pale as far as I'm concerned. This is OTC at Rig Talk, after all. Most of those pics have been posted on instagram and facebook with no adult restrictions, FWIMBW. This is alarming to me.
So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.

That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.

The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.

And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place. This is a gear forum, not a beach.
 
Last edited:
So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.

That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.

The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.

And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place. This is a gear forum, not a beach.
I can see where you're 'trying' to come from however, it ain't an apples for apples comparison in any sense of the word.

Musicians write songs about sex & love. They also write songs directly about women.

Guitars are considered a sexual tool or object to many.

Many play guitar to attract & appeal to women.

See, RT has an audience that is mostly about the opposite sex.

Target? They have shoppers focused on merchandise and sometimes shopping with their minors.

I just love it when the woke think they have the answers to justify their twisted reality which is insulting & ridiculous.
 
I can see where you're 'trying' to come from however, it ain't an apples for apples comparison in any sense of the word.

Musicians write songs about sex & love. They also write songs directly about women.

Guitars are considered a sexual tool or object to many.

Many play guitar to attract & appeal to women.

See, RT has an audience that is mostly about the opposite sex.

Target? They have shoppers focused on merchandise and sometimes shopping with their minors.

I just love it when the woke think they have the answers to justify their twisted reality which is insulting & ridiculous.
Drinking game time: Everyone take a shot, someone used the phrase "woke" to sound superior to someone else on the internet
 
To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum
 
To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum
It can't be me, I'm innocent. :2thumbsup:

Here are few of my related items.

Lucky I ain't leaning my tits on any of them. :hys::jerkit::hys::jerkit:

pOibIga.jpg


QdDpKHf.jpg


vugrHTl.jpg


jbSbwup.jpg
 
Back
Top