glpg80":lv8ii3cg said:
engage757":lv8ii3cg said:
glpg80":lv8ii3cg said:
If he agreed and then wont deliver that is one thing. But if he was not interested in the sale and didnt feel comfortable going through with it then that is perfectly legitimate as well - you can not fault him for that. However if he lied about it and refuses to be an honest seller then feedback should be posted.
Or maybe the OP just tried to pull a blackmail-like stunt to get the instrument. I agree, this isn't ss.org. It is far more respectable.
Given what I have seen of how nutty this guy went about NOT getting the deal, it sounds like someone that is a little butt-hurt and trying to start an issue over it.
I don't think feedback would apply to this until a deal was made. There was no deal in this case as far as I can tell. MOney never moved and neither did an instrument.
Engage you deal with some high end stuff so you know how this goes - but to the OP here is how it works on the internet - the seller can pull the ad anytime he pleases as long as money is not transferred. If Mehtab had the guitar and decided not to sell (for any reason) and nothing transferred bank accounts then the buyer can do nothing but walk.
I had a seller back out of an expensive amp deal because he did not want to part with it. Was not a problem - both parties walked on. He was not ready to sell yet. Shit happens.
What does not sit well with me though is how Mehtab mentions a broken guitar with no broken guitar pictures?
Thanks for your input, everyone. To clarify a few points here - no money has been transferred. So, sure, nothing to talk about here. I get that. But a deal HAD been reached (correcting one comment) and I was promised a final shipping quote for the total for "tomorrow". Of course we agreed for me to pay upfront. Up to this point, our correspondence had been on great terms and Mehtab was very friendly and responsive. And then suddenly he wasn't. Mods can read our PMs and confirm exactly that. None of this would have happened if he had simply responded to my check-ins or given me an update on this alleged headstock break. I just don't believe it, particularly with the way he doesn't even defend it, nor his lack of responsiveness to me. We're all awaiting the pics.
Do I expect him to send me a guitar without paying for it? Of course not. I'm not crazy. I opened a door (however unrealistic) for Mehtab to make good on dicking me around with this deal to make a point. And honestly, I think some people are intentionally distracting the issue by getting stuck on this detail. Nobody on the planet would have entertained that conversation in the first place. I would love to find an agreeable solution in which the trade could still go down, but of course that's entirely unlikely at this point.
I'm sure you all can read into the content and tone of my post here and my original one and see that I'm not a completely hot-headed, unreasonable guy. I completely realize the impression you guys must have of me here - no references, just few posts vs. a guy that's done tons of successful deals and has friends here. I tried to engage in my first RT deal with nothing but respect and courtesy for the seller, the community, and the rules of engagement, and I got dicked around, at the very least in as much as communication goes. Pretty frustrating. What else can I say and do besides what I think the right thing is here and speak up about how Mehtab handled the situation and how I find other elements of the situation to be pretty sketchy. Its certainly a regrettable situation, but I stand by my actions. Should Mehtab be surprised about how any of this turned out? Absolutely not.
If Mehtab is able to provide pics of the guitar with the broken headstock, then I suppose he'll clear his side of the disagreement here and we'll chalk it up to his communication skills needing some work. If not, then I think we'll all have some doubt about his integrity around following through with agreements that he makes with other forum members. Obviously the alternative scenario - an offer he liked better than mine - fits this story a lot better than a broken headstock.
Again, the admins here can confirm in our PMs all day long that we had a completely standard deal fully agreed upon which he disappeared from.
I still find the association with GP and the self-claimed 6-figure "stealth-marketing supported instrument sales business" pretty sketchy, and the fact that its gone undisclosed is not in the spirit of forum rules. The very nature of it sounds deceptive. Maybe its all totally harmless and I'm reading into it. What do I know? I will defer to the community here.