swamptrashstompboxes":32x4tydl said:
Simon Dorn":32x4tydl said:
swamptrashstompboxes":32x4tydl said:
Simon Dorn":32x4tydl said:
swamptrashstompboxes":32x4tydl said:
I know I sound crazy but I vote for the rec.
No, you don't. I vote for the Mesa also.
Good. lol. What is the major difference between the rev d and rev g?
I didn't compare the D to the G side by side, but i did compare the G to the F.
The G had the nicer clean, was more aggressive and had more gain but also was a bit more hollow-sounding.
I like the F more than the G. The D is brighter and tighter than the F. The F is the rounder, more complete amp compared to the D. But keep in mind that my F still has the 26 years old Mesa Tubes in it and the D runs on TAD 12ax7a-c and TAD EL34B-STR. That's how i got it. It was an ebay auction. The seller didn't even know what he had and luckily not many of the bidders either
Thanks for the info. I have a Tremoverb, which from my understanding is similar to a rev g, but it needs a timmy to boost it.
The reverb is nice to have. And snagged it for $600 in perfect shape. Cheap is good.
Have you tried a bogner uberschall twin jet? I was gassing for one of those a while ago.
You're welcome. Yes it it is. It was the Flagship of that time. I need a boost for every amp. Except for the 5150III series, but i found them to be a bit sterile sounding. That's cheap. But we can get a used Diezel Hagen for around 14-1500 Bucks, over here, if we want to
Yes, i had both the Rev Blue and the Twin. Twin went first and the Rev Blue followed after i got my Dual Rev F.
I liked the Rev Blue better than the Twin. The Twin was a bit weak sounding, compared to the Blue.