espquade
Well-known member
I was under the impression that they were Republicans against the current administration. Was I wrong?The Lincoln Project are communists.
I was under the impression that they were Republicans against the current administration. Was I wrong?The Lincoln Project are communists.
Yes, leftists.I was under the impression that they were Republicans against the current administration. Was I wrong?
THANK you.They’re.
Oh so if the Republican's don't bow down and kiss the ring then they are leftists???Yes, leftists.
Spelling is the most important thing to some, have at it.THANK you.![]()
Spelling is the most important thing to some, have at it.
Technically it wasn't misspelled. It's improper grammar. And I'd say it is fairly important.Spelling is the most important thing to some, have at it.
Funny you mention that, this guy theorizes this is part of the Great Reset with financial and military factions negotiating....
It would seem that this scenario qualifies as a "Controlled Demolition" by the financial, military and technocratic elites destroying 20+% of the worlds oil and LNG supply for possibly 3-5 or more years to make these Persian oil and LNG fields viable again. If this continues much longer expect energy shortage/crisis like the oil embargo during the 1970's in the ole US of A of which I was a kid and remember you could only get gas on certain day with issued license plates. The Technocrats would love this and it would collapse the US supply chains of almost everything that moves by boat or truck.There is no "saving the dollar", it's dead already.
He's wrong about the US building weapons, we already have space based weapons like "The Rods Of God".
It would seem that this scenario qualifies as a "Controlled Demolition" by the financial, military and technocratic elites destroying 20+% of the worlds oil and LNG supply for possibly 3-5 or more years to make these Persian oil and LNG fields viable again.
In other words........A New World Order....
The good thing about a financial reset would be seeing mom and pop stores a thing again, can't wait.
I don't think the finance and AI techno bros have that in their plans.....something more along the lines of the Hunger Games movies. I view this more along the lines of more wealth consolidation of the 1% trying to bring about a Neo-Fuedalist(1984) society where there is no middle class, thus the masses easier to rule. Just read anything Henry Kissinger and the Klaus Schwab sycophants have written.The good thing about a financial reset would be seeing mom and pop stores a thing again, can't wait.
Some say that was nothing more than a test run for what comes next. I hope this never comes to fruition.Their plan is more corporate dominance, not less. So anything independent (such as small businesses) will be considered unacceptable and must be bullied out of existence. They did this very effectively under the cover of the covid bio-attack and fake vaccine era.
When no one buys our treasuries and the fed has to, trillions of dollars worth. We will see what happens to the dollar when all the printing happens.Their plan is more corporate dominance, not less. So anything independent (such as small businesses) will be considered unacceptable and must be bullied out of existence. They did this very effectively under the cover of the covid bio-attack and fake vaccine era.
Some say that was nothing more than a test run for what comes next. I hope this never comes to fruition.
Hey, did you ever figure out what a vag-jaja is yet?Well the video is pure propaganda but...
I'm assuming the point of this thread is to say most if not all politicians lie. I agree with that with a caveat. I don't think politicians necessarily always go in with the full intentions of lying or backtracking on their promises. I'd wager there have been a few instances when the situation had changed after the election and keeping specific campaign promises are no longer an option. This is why I do my best to judge terms as a whole and not jump into a knee jerk reaction at the first sign of backtracking.
Since the video was all Trump, none of us have full info on why he went back on his no new wars campaign promise. It could have been Iran was actually close to having a nuclear missile, no wars conflicted with making America more prominent on the global stage. Personally I think it's a mix of the 2. Two birds; one stone. Take care of Iran while securing America's future in energy and the petrodollar. Or Trump could have said fuck it, I want to poke the bear.
Fact is, we're not in the oval office briefings to know the entire story. At this point what's done is done, we have no control on what happens next, and there really is no use continuing to bitch about it. Best we can do is sit back, hope for the best (whatever that means to you), and see what happens.
No, you're correct. The morons here just label anyone who criticizes their Dear Leader as a "CoMMuNiST!!!!!@1!!!I was under the impression that they were Republicans against the current administration. Was I wrong?