Engl Questions????

  • Thread starter Thread starter VESmedic
  • Start date Start date
VESmedic":1mwuwr8a said:
EnGl":1mwuwr8a said:
Guuuys ... ENGL are really total shit as you describe ?

I want to buy a Fireball 100 but now ... I really don't know ...



Um, I don't really think thats what people are saying.....
Agreed, that's not what people are saying. And as someone who has owned a boatload of Diezels, Engls, Bogners, etc, I can tell you it ain't true. Engls are fantastic amps.

It's just personal preference and/or inexperience.
 
glpg80":24vat6m0 said:
I do not need specific cabinets for my 5150 or 94 Tremoverb. They have sounded great with any cabinet, but are speaker dependent and prefer V30's.
No amp sounds its best with every cabinet. Maybe your two amps have sounded good with the first few cabs you tried. If so, congrats - you have sidestepped a long process of cab matching that many guitarists have to go through. And when I say cab matching, I include speakers, too. If you were to try more cabs, you'd find they can have a big impact on how the speaker sounds in them.

glpg80":24vat6m0 said:
I agree with the OP and that is exactly my opinion on them as well. I have not needed to flip gear to find what i was looking for - these are the only amplifier heads i have ever purchased in my life and i did so playing, researching, and listening - not reading forums or testimonies. No EQ pedal is a magic box for everything. As a matter of fact i find that the more pedals and effects you have to add the more you take away from your core tone and do not allow the amp to breathe - the exception being front end boosts. What i love about either of amplifier is the ability to actually sound better at band volume than at bedroom volume, any cabinet, live or in the studio. They were made to be cranked and have no real weakness on their own.
I have owned more than 50 different amps and more than 20 cabs, and my experience is certainly different than yours. If you've found what you want in the two amps you have owned, that's great. You'll save a lot of money chasing amps and tone. But you should be careful making blanket statements about how EQ pedals impact amps, or how lots of pedals degrade an amps tone, when your experience level appears to be pretty narrow.

In fact, an EQ pedal in the loop can be essential if you play a lot of different rooms. The different sizes and shapes of the rooms you play on gigs have a very big impact on how your amp is heard. Pro sound guys have known this for years, and it's a common practice for them to set their PA's 31-band EQ differently for each room they play. This helps to smooth out the frequency extremes that can be emphasized or negated by the shape of the room, height of ceiling, reflective wall or floor surfaces, etc.

Your amp is affected in the same way. Whether you are miced FOH or just playing with stage volume, every room will make your amp sound different to the audience. For this reason, a decent 7 or 10 band EQ in the loop can REALLY help you maintain a consistent sound every night. Because you'll have to adjust it every time you play a new place.

And this isn't even taking into account tube variance. Even with tubes that are still full of life, there can be tonal variations from night to night. Add that to the changing room dimensions, and their impact on your tone, and you have a lot to take into account.

Many guitarists don't want to deal with this hassle. Some just try to compensate for room variations by just using their Bass, Mid, and Treble knobs on their amp. But the amp EQ is too limiting in its scope, and there is too much give and take with this method. Other players will just use the same settings regardless of where they play. They stand right in front of their amp and think "It sounds good to me," and they are done. But this is amateur behavior. IMO, if you are going to be particular about your tone, you should care what your amp sounds like when it actually reaches the listener. And this requires effort. An EQ pedal is a great way to take care of this. I call it a magic box because of how much impact it can have on anyone's tone. And that potential impact is HUGE.

EQ is largely what separates most amp tones. To ignore this, when it changes from room to room, is to basically ignore your tone.

glpg80":24vat6m0 said:
Engl's are great at what they do but get old. It is not all up to the user to determine what is right or wrong from a product - all of that is determined by the engineer building it - whether it fits your perspective of "the subjective tone in your head" is totally up to you. Engl or not is subjective. Not the cabinet, the pedals, or anything else. That just helps you get closer or farther - once again all subjective.
Yes, all tone is subjective. But if you really love an amp's tone at first, and then "it gets old", then maybe it's not the amp's fault. Putting aside issues of tubes wearing out, etc, it could be that they player is doing something different. It's silly to say that an amp sounds good at first, and then 'gets old.'

If somebody doesn't like Engls, that's just fine. There are many different amp makers because we all have different tastes and different tonal goals. But every time I hear someone complain about how an amp they used to love no longer sounds good, I find it's either because their tubes are worn out or because they won't make EQ adjustments.
 
Holy shit i found your sensitive spot :lol: :LOL:

squank":2x7dm3nz said:
If somebody doesn't like Engls, that's just fine. There are many different amp makers because we all have different tastes and different tonal goals. But every time I hear someone complain about how an amp they used to love no longer sounds good, I find it's either because their tubes are worn out or because they won't make EQ adjustments.

Then who died and made you the savior of the Engl amplifier line? It is not like my words are set in stone. You have an opinion and love the Engl amp line - that is great my friend. But i feel over 80% of their market is based on compensation for problematic voicing to begin with. Mid boosts, dual volumes, and more features you can shake a stick at - all for high gain.

Make too many adjustments and you'll either make yourself tone deaf or allow yourself to dial in a shit mix live but have a great bedroom tone. Diezels to my ears also fall in this ballgame - great studio tones but nothing i would want live - minus the VH4's voicing. EQ adjustments wont do anything if the user does not have a clue what tone they are shooting for to begin with.

To me each amplifier is different, a good starting basis is required and a full understanding no amplifier is absolutely perfect. Then you build from there. That goes against everything engl is about in allowing the user more bells and whistles than you can shake a stick at. If i can not dial in a usable tone with a guitar, 30 seconds of my time, and a decent speaker, i want nothing of it. Ive been able to own the same amplifiers for 7 years running and never felt the need to sell either of them - because i know the difference between an amplifier's voicing not fitting my needs and bad tubes.
 
glpg80":3f4r8rm5 said:
Holy shit i found your sensitive spot :lol: :LOL:

squank":3f4r8rm5 said:
If somebody doesn't like Engls, that's just fine. There are many different amp makers because we all have different tastes and different tonal goals. But every time I hear someone complain about how an amp they used to love no longer sounds good, I find it's either because their tubes are worn out or because they won't make EQ adjustments.

Then who died and made you the savior of the Engl amplifier line? It is not like my words are set in stone. You have an opinion and love the Engl amp line - that is great my friend. But i feel over 80% of their market is based on compensation for problematic voicing to begin with. Mid boosts, dual volumes, and more features you can shake a stick at - all for high gain.

Make too many adjustments and you'll either make yourself tone deaf or allow yourself to dial in a shit mix live but have a great bedroom tone. Diezels to my ears also fall in this ballgame, minus the VH4. EQ adjustments wont do anything if the user does not have a clue what tone they are shooting for to begin with. Music is about expression, after all.

To me each amplifier is different, a good starting basis is required and a full understanding no amplifier is absolutely perfect. Then you build from there. That goes against everything engl is about in allowing the user more bells and whistles than you can shake a stick at. If i can not dial in a usable tone with a guitar, 30 seconds of my time, and a decent speaker, i want nothing of it. Ive been able to own the same amplifiers for 7 years running and never felt the need to sell either of them - because i know the difference between an amplifier's voicing not fitting my needs and bad tubes.



:lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: LOl Im with ya glp for sure bud...especially about the mid boosts etc, dual volumes.

squank, I think you are making this way too complicated. There amps don't cut it for me, period...Have you EVER heard someone say a splawn doesnt cut through? an SLO? 5150? JCM 800? VHT/Fryette Ultralead? NOT, and that is my point...You will probably never hear that, because they just do not have that problem live. Every time I've heard an Engl live, (or used one myself!!!) it has not gone well, thats all I'm saying.
 
Gonna put my dog in this fight..... :lol: :LOL:
Every Engl I owned (just three)came thru fine.
Invader 150.....Fireball 100 and the Savage 120. :thumbsup:
I play with a full band every weekend and loved all them amps. :yes:
But if someone dont like it or gel with it......thats a whole different story. ;)
 
I have owned 2 powerballs,a blackmore,and a savage.I never had a problem in a band mix with the savage or powerball.the BM had a noise issue so I never gigged it and ended up selling it...of the 3 I prefer the savage but the amp had way to much going on for me.I only liked the cleans and the lead channel and didn't need all the bells and whistles so I offed it.the powerball was cool but lacked the rawness of a tube amp best solid state amp ever that is all tube.I also only liked the cleans and lead 1 and the onboard gate was a joke

I have also got a hold of 2 fireball 100's and that amp just kills.it is everything the powerball should have been IMO.if I ever decide to buy another engl it will be a fireball 100.only con is the shared EQ but for me that's not a deal breaker
 
magh8":2afhdta1 said:
I have owned 2 powerballs,a blackmore,and a savage.I never had a problem in a band mix with the savage or powerball.the BM had a noise issue so I never gigged it and ended up selling it...of the 3 I prefer the savage but the amp had way to much going on for me.I only liked the cleans and the lead channel and didn't need all the bells and whistles so I offed it.the powerball was cool but lacked the rawness of a tube amp best solid state amp ever that is all tube.I also only liked the cleans and lead 1 and the onboard gate was a joke

I have also got a hold of 2 fireball 100's and that amp just kills.it is everything the powerball should have been IMO.if I ever decide to buy another engl it will be a fireball 100.only con is the shared EQ but for me that's not a deal breaker
Thanks Man....this is what I feel exactly. :thumbsup:
 
Mailman1971":2tkvkse2 said:
magh8":2tkvkse2 said:
I have owned 2 powerballs,a blackmore,and a savage.I never had a problem in a band mix with the savage or powerball.the BM had a noise issue so I never gigged it and ended up selling it...of the 3 I prefer the savage but the amp had way to much going on for me.I only liked the cleans and the lead channel and didn't need all the bells and whistles so I offed it.the powerball was cool but lacked the rawness of a tube amp best solid state amp ever that is all tube.I also only liked the cleans and lead 1 and the onboard gate was a joke

I have also got a hold of 2 fireball 100's and that amp just kills.it is everything the powerball should have been IMO.if I ever decide to buy another engl it will be a fireball 100.only con is the shared EQ but for me that's not a deal breaker
Thanks Man....this is what I feel exactly. :thumbsup:
yeah,I been on a role lately. ;)
 
Mailman1971":i0mhkfm0 said:
But if someone dont like it or gel with it......thats a whole different story. ;)

Exactly!

Not saying Engl sucks at all, but the voicing is not for me compared to my two channel TOV or 5150 II. Would i rock an Engl? Sure. Would i prefer it as a staple in my stable? Not with my other amps covering everything i need them for. I am not out to be like scarf dude :lol: :LOL:

scarfman.jpg
 
glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
Holy shit i found your sensitive spot :lol: :LOL:
glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
Then who died and made you the savior of the Engl amplifier line? It is not like my words are set in stone. You have an opinion and love the Engl amp line - that is great my friend.
Not sure I'd call it my sensitive spot, but I do get concerned when I see threads with blanket statements about a varied amp line (even ones I don't love, like Mesas). Like I said, it doesn't bother me if somebody doesn't like Engls. To each their own. But I think it's unfair to other forum readers (many of whom use forum advice to help them narrow their amp search) to disparage the entire amp line by saying the tone gets old. That implies the amps have problems maintaining their original tone, etc.

glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
But i feel over 80% of their market is based on compensation for problematic voicing to begin with. Mid boosts, dual volumes, and more features you can shake a stick at - all for high gain.
It's funny, I never would consider a bunch of cool tonal options and other features compensation. As a gigging musician, it's one of the things that I really appreciate about the amp. It makes it so much more flexible than other amps like it. It's also what sets it above Diezels in my book for gigging amps. Both can get great tones, but the Engls have more tone options available at via footswitch. So for me, I see all these as great flavor choices on an already great amp. But even if you don't want/need this flexibility, it doesn't mean they are compensating for a bad stock tone.

I'm not trying to be the savior of the amp line (it doesn't need me to do that). It just sounded like an unfair swipe at the amp.

glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
Make too many adjustments and you'll either make yourself tone deaf or allow yourself to dial in a shit mix live but have a great bedroom tone. Diezels to my ears also fall in this ballgame - great studio tones but nothing i would want live - minus the VH4's voicing.
This assumes the person has no ability to adjust an amp or an EQ. Of course, it takes some practice, and like anything else, some people do it better than others. But it's a reality of live playing that your gear is going to sound different from room to room.


glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
EQ adjustments wont do anything if the user does not have a clue what tone they are shooting for to begin with.
Well, you could say the same thing about amps. You kind of need to know what you want from an amp.

glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
To me each amplifier is different, a good starting basis is required and a full understanding no amplifier is absolutely perfect. Then you build from there. That goes against everything engl is about in allowing the user more bells and whistles than you can shake a stick at.
So, are you saying that because Engl offers you more tonal options, it's bad?

glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
If i can not dial in a usable tone with a guitar, 30 seconds of my time, and a decent speaker, i want nothing of it.
Every Engl I've played has fallen into this category. I haven't found them hard to dial in at all.

glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
Ive been able to own the same amplifiers for 7 years running and never felt the need to sell either of them
That's commendable.
glpg80":2m61kzfl said:
- because i know the difference between an amplifier's voicing not fitting my needs and bad tubes.
And if you had just said that originally, we wouldn't be having this conversation. ;)
 
VESmedic":2zpawk5p said:
:lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: LOl Im with ya glp for sure bud...especially about the mid boosts etc, dual volumes.

squank, I think you are making this way too complicated. There amps don't cut it for me, period...Have you EVER heard someone say a splawn doesnt cut through? an SLO? 5150? JCM 800? VHT/Fryette Ultralead? NOT, and that is my point...You will probably never hear that, because they just do not have that problem live. Every time I've heard an Engl live, (or used one myself!!!) it has not gone well, thats all I'm saying.
Yes, I have heard people say Splawns and and 5150s don't cut through. I've heard them used live not cutting through, too. And that's because it's pretty much up to the person dialing in the amp. EQ is everything on cutting through the mix. If you set up the amp wrong, it's not going to cut.

Modern high gain amps often have a modern voicing that shaves the mids. That's because amp makers know their audience. They know that most amps will be played at home, and never in a band situation. At home, people want to hear the scooped sound that would never cut through in a mix. But it doesn't mean that Engls and Diezels can't easily cut through. A quick EQ adjustment and you are there. Easy peasy.
 
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
I'm not trying to be the savior of the amp line (it doesn't need me to do that). It just sounded like an unfair swipe at the amp.
I call it like it is - whether you're volunteering to put your two cents worth in vetoing my opinion instead of accepting it or Engl is paying you to do it secretly does not matter - it is still being done :D
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
This assumes the person has no ability to adjust an amp or an EQ. Of course, it takes some practice, and like anything else, some people do it better than others. But it's a reality of live playing that your gear is going to sound different from room to room.
I call bullshit on this one. Either you know how to turn a knob to adjust to taste or you are a drummer who has not come out of the closet yet.
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
Well, you could say the same thing about amps. You kind of need to know what you want from an amp.
What did you think i was talking about? Kitchen countertops? What i look for in an amplifier may be absolutely nothing like what others might look for. Matt/shredder75 made the joke once about the packaging not suiting his needs and sending it back - this analogy works well here.
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
So, are you saying that because Engl offers you more tonal options, it's bad?
Do users need instructions on how to turn a knob? By your assessment they would, since
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
the person has no ability to adjust an amp or an EQ. Of course, it takes some practice
So in conclusion, it is highly possible to dial in a bedroom tone and it completely suck in a live situation, or vice-versa. Bells and whistles give more control, they do not guarantee great tone.
glpg80":2nj8v5w5 said:
Ive been able to own the same amplifiers for 7 years running and never felt the need to sell either of them
squank":2nj8v5w5 said:
That's commendable.
It means i know what i am looking for, and the forum e-cred of an amplifier or another member is not one of them :thumbsup:
 
Any of of you guys tried the press or new power amps? Thinking about picking something up from Brad, but haven't heard any of the pre and rack amps.
 
Back
Top