
Aidanspaghetti
Member
Lovely axe Xssive 

Chubtone":21ofcxol said:I have listened to this CD at least a dozen times in my car.
I have been one of the main guys keeping Joe's name alive on forums and one of the main guys talking about his tone and playing.
That being said, while the album is very well done, I think if they would have titled it "Bad Motor Facelift Super Unknown Dirt Finger" it would have been a little more accurate. I know why tons of you guys are digging it, but for crying out loud it may be the most derivative thing I've ever heard. Edit: I listened to it again today and it really makes me wonder how this CD would have sounded with a different singer. The guy on here has a great voice but he writes and phrases and harmonizes and sounds so much like two singers from Seattle it almost sounds like he's auditioning for a tribute band.
Joe has killer tone and wicked chops and the drums and bass are great on this too. For the first time in my life I actually wanted to hear what Ozzy would have done vocally with some of these songs.
I'm sorry to be the stick in the mud and everyone knows I am an 80's guy....... BUT SO IS JOE!!!!! It's not like I bought a Jerry Cantrell or Kim Thayill album and wanted them to sound a way they aren't known for sounding. One of the funniest things ever is that one of Joe's buddies in the industry that had heard all the studio stuff kept saying, "this new Joe Holmes album is going to sound like a modern day Deep Purple". Yeah, that's what it sounds like.![]()
![]()
metalmaniac93":1vymqmbu said:Chubtone":1vymqmbu said:I have listened to this CD at least a dozen times in my car.
I have been one of the main guys keeping Joe's name alive on forums and one of the main guys talking about his tone and playing.
That being said, while the album is very well done, I think if they would have titled it "Bad Motor Facelift Super Unknown Dirt Finger" it would have been a little more accurate. I know why tons of you guys are digging it, but for crying out loud it may be the most derivative thing I've ever heard. Edit: I listened to it again today and it really makes me wonder how this CD would have sounded with a different singer. The guy on here has a great voice but he writes and phrases and harmonizes and sounds so much like two singers from Seattle it almost sounds like he's auditioning for a tribute band.
Joe has killer tone and wicked chops and the drums and bass are great on this too. For the first time in my life I actually wanted to hear what Ozzy would have done vocally with some of these songs.
I'm sorry to be the stick in the mud and everyone knows I am an 80's guy....... BUT SO IS JOE!!!!! It's not like I bought a Jerry Cantrell or Kim Thayill album and wanted them to sound a way they aren't known for sounding. One of the funniest things ever is that one of Joe's buddies in the industry that had heard all the studio stuff kept saying, "this new Joe Holmes album is going to sound like a modern day Deep Purple". Yeah, that's what it sounds like.![]()
![]()
Yeah, I get why you don't dig it as much as most of us!! I love it!!! While I am an 80's guy and still dig most of the stuff from that era, AIC is one of my favorite bands of the 90's and actually one of my favorite bands period (well at least the older stuff). Definitely does not sound like modern day Deep Purple though!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
suhrimmetal":24a1n6j5 said:Love Joe... but I do agree. Im so glad he is back making music and will tour this record!! But I wish it was more in the 80's vein.. riff, after killer riff, 4th chords, Blues, penta, mixo inspired leads, hooky melodies.. I know he can write and play anything. Was surprised and a bit let down at the alt/modern flavor... tho it's still one of the better albums in last year.... and 'Sound of my Gun' is a KILLER track... that song could stay.... just hoping for more 'rock' vibed music in the future from them. IMO![]()
I've got most of Am I One, but I haven't written it down...Glynchfan1":2c5gjhqh said:Tab???? Anyone got any of the song tabbed out? I'm working on by ear, but definetly looking for tab to make the process quicker. Thanks!!!!
I would have rather heard something in the vein of the music he was doing in his youth and I also agree that the leads (while viciously well played and having their moments) tend to not really go anywhere memorable.Chubtone":3am90o42 said:suhrimmetal":3am90o42 said:Love Joe... but I do agree. Im so glad he is back making music and will tour this record!! But I wish it was more in the 80's vein.. riff, after killer riff, 4th chords, Blues, penta, mixo inspired leads, hooky melodies.. I know he can write and play anything. Was surprised and a bit let down at the alt/modern flavor... tho it's still one of the better albums in last year.... and 'Sound of my Gun' is a KILLER track... that song could stay.... just hoping for more 'rock' vibed music in the future from them. IMO![]()
Thanks. I thought I was the only one. Well, except for donbarzini who texted me after reading my post and said I was right on and that he doesn't dig this at all.
I have brought this up before on here, but will do it again. Joe was born in 1963. He took lessons from Randy Rhoads. He was 28 years old when the Seattle grunge/alternative thing hit. I know most people are most inspired by and remain most inspired by the music of their youth. By "youth" I mean WAY before 28. I'd imagine taking lessons from Randy Rhoads, recording an album and touring with Lizzy Borden, replacing Eddie Van Halen, Steve Vai and Jason Becker in David Lee Roth's band and then replacing Randy, Jake and Zakk in Ozzy's band might have had a fairly big impact on Joe. Moreso, I would think than a style of music that was not what he grew up on, not what inspired him to sit in his room and become one of the top players in LA back in LA's glory days etc would not be the first thing on his list of wanting to sound like when he has 100% artistic freedom to do his own thing.
Yes, I know the sounds of 1983-1991 are dated. But wouldn't the sounds of 1991-1993 be pretty damn dated as well?
Just sayin'.
XSSIVE":3omo94aj said:I but I look at as "what if 90s guitarists actually knew how to solo"...you get Farmikos lol. I think that's why it's my favorite new band and I like it so much, it spans the two musical decades that I relate to most.
this...TIBrent":3d95xg1z said:First off those Luxxtones look SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Secondly Joe Holmes kicks major ass!
& Lastly, Farmikos is absolutely killer, great record.
Chubtone":katk4s0h said:Your post is great and I concede that is how most would feel. I guess the early 90's sounds to me are so frustrating because that is when I figured out at age 25 that I would rather not "make it" than to "make it" playing the new style of music that was coming from Seattle...
I couldn't stand watching LA guys go from the metal look, to the Shout At The Devil look, to the Look What the Cat Dragged In look to the Girls, Girls, Girls/GNR/LA Guns look.
ZR4400":qagmilih said:Who is Joe Holmes?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bob Savage":27wz9rja said:It's interesting how different and similar our perspectives are at the same time. I decided I didn't want to "make it" around the mid 80's because the excess and glam look of LA at the time just didn't do it for me. Whereas a lot of people were/are bitter that Nirvana "killed metal," from my perspective 80's metal had run its course and was just begging to be murdered. While I didn't get into the music scene of the grunge era I did enjoy a lot of Nirvana's music when it popped on the radio. Not a lot of other bands from that era really caught my attention although AIC were killer.
I bought Farmikos too and while I don't regret buying, it the vocals do keep it from entering an ongoing listening rotation. The singer is great at what he does and he can certainly sing but just not my thing, possibly because of the points you made in an earlier post. That said, the fact that they released an album and will hopefully do some live shows is awesome. This kind of music being out there can only be a good thing for crusty dudes like me who want to get back out there and play live again.
ejecta":1kvh56p8 said:I've been playing since 84 and I'm just so beyond glad I'm not stuck in one era of music.
+1ejecta":2yqveg59 said:beyond glad I'm not stuck in one era of music.
Chubtone":2fm354g3 said:ejecta":2fm354g3 said:I've been playing since 84 and I'm just so beyond glad I'm not stuck in one era of music.
So are we! I don't think your input to this forum would be nearly so valuable otherwise.
H Golf Sport":2fm354g3 said:Would it really have been less derivative if it was some rehashed glam metal?
Chubtone":25xx5hfm said:Bob, I moved to LA in 1985 so I missed bands like Armored Saint, and Malice and Lizzy Borden and early Rough Cutt and that more metal sound and look. I got here right after that and things did start getting very glammy as soon as Poison got signed. We met Bret and CC on our first night in LA and they were in full stage clothes and make-up just promoting their next show at the Troubador. My buddy and I had just arrived that day from Chicago and we were not used to that level of glam.
But MANY bands never went that glammy. We never did. Terriff with Joe, Lion with Doug Aldrich, Racer X, and tons of other bands stayed with a more traditional look and a harder sound. You didn't HAVE to go glammy but I can certainly understand the annoyance at the majority of the scene chasing it.
As for Nirvana's music, I'm glad you enjoyed it.![]()