Freedom of Speech

CoolGuitarGear

Well-known member
It appears some snowflakes could not handle the freedom of speech of others, by having some threads deleted. Interestingly, they like their freedom of speech upheld. Perhaps this will help to educate those who are offended easily, since I find such actions offensive:

 
  • Like
Reactions: lll
A detailed one on Covid, and a few others. The Covid one, however, had a ton of good resources and information on the virus and the vax. I guess Gates owns more media that I realized.
I didn't realize that happened. Jesus, we live in a world of pussified hypocrisy.
And get ready for the "it's a private forum there is no freedom of speech" lectures. I get that that, and they make the rules, it's just pretty obvious where the bias lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lll
Nigel has deleted them. Either he's been given mod rights or has deleted threads that he has started himself.
 
Last edited:
Or you could find a forum that specializes in bullshit, conspiracy, and other nuttery. Post your garbage there, and it'll probably stick around. (y)
Same with you, CUNTZ, and your usual libtard rhetoric. The difference, however, is that I support your freedom of speech and to stay here; I support your right to sound like a fuckin' moron. It not only makes the rest of us sound intelligent, but it helps to weed out the weak minded sheep willing to suck the dong of the government. Remember when people used to challenge the gov't and censorship? Today it's the non-libtards who are the revolutionaries, and the libtards, like yourself, who are the cucks of Gates and the rest of them. Weird how that has turned around in the past 20 years.
 
W
 

Attachments

  • 175344719_10220996516644920_2743173911811062490_n.jpg
    175344719_10220996516644920_2743173911811062490_n.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 44
Same with you, CUNTZ, and your usual libtard rhetoric. The difference, however, is that I support your freedom of speech and to stay here; I support your right to sound like a fuckin' moron. It not only makes the rest of us sound intelligent, but it helps to weed out the weak minded sheep willing to suck the dong of the government. Remember when people used to challenge the gov't and censorship? Today it's the non-libtards who are the revolutionaries, and the libtards, like yourself, who are the cucks of Gates and the rest of them. Weird how that has turned around in the past 20 years.

So I should be able to frequent a Christian church, and say anything I want in the church right. I should be able to wear a shirt that says Mohammad can beat up Jesus, and not get tossed the fuck out right?

Do you own this website, or any portion of it? Why do you feel entitled to freedom of speech on a space you're not entitled to?
 
The internet is not real life. Freedom of speech is not freedom of posting what ever the fuck you want. 9 out of 10 wouldn’t say the things they say if someone was right in front of them. Im all about freedom of speech.
 
So I should be able to frequent a Christian church, and say anything I want in the church right. I should be able to wear a shirt that says Mohammad can beat up Jesus, and not get tossed the fuck out right?

Do you own this website, or any portion of it? Why do you feel entitled to freedom of speech on a space you're not entitled to?
I bet if you wanted to debate religion, then that the minister/priest would be willing to do it and NOT toss you out. Never did I incite violence. Rather, I presented information that others could ignore or challenge. How horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember the old debates about porn, and it came down to: "If you don't want to look at it, then don't, but others may want to." How is what is being said on a platform THAT WELCOMES DISCUSSION any different? Plain and simple, if you INVITE the discussion and do not like an opinion, what does that say about your ability to think, debate or accept the opinions of others if removed? COMMUNISM, no? If you are afraid of others' opinions and may not like what others say, then don't offer a platform in which to discuss. If only ONE opinion is allow, it is not a discussion, but an opinion site. It should be labeled as such so that people do not INVEST TIME AND EFFORT in thinking it is a DISCUSSION site. It's like YouTube, Facebook, etc. Simply state that you are pro liberal, pro vaccine, pro gov't, pro big-tech and that differences of opinion will be suspended or cancelled. What's so hard about that? At least the honesty I can respect.
 
I bet if you wanted to debate religion, then that the minister/priest would be willing to do it and NOT toss you out. Never did I incite violence. Rather, I presented information that others could ignore or challenge. How horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember the old debates about porn, and it came down to: "If you don't want to look at it, then don't, but others may want to." How is what is being said on a platform THAT WELCOMES DISCUSSION any different? Plain and simple, if you INVITE the discussion and do not like an opinion, what does that say about your ability to think, debate or accept the opinions of others if removed? COMMUNISM, no? If you are afraid of others' opinions and may not like what others say, then don't offer a platform in which to discuss. If only ONE opinion is allow, it is not a discussion, but an opinion site. It should be labeled as such so that people do not INVEST TIME AND EFFORT in thinking it is a DISCUSSION site. It's like YouTube, Facebook, etc. Simply state that you are pro liberal, pro vaccine, pro gov't, pro big-tech and that differences of opinion will be suspended or cancelled. What's so hard about that? At least the honesty I can respect.


Is the minister required to allow a Islamic leader use of his platform to preach the word of Muhammad, and Allah for a portion of the service?

Can the minister say we do not preach Islam here, fuck off, and find a place that allows it?
 
Remember when people used to challenge the gov't and censorship? Today it's the non-libtards who are the revolutionaries, and the libtards, like yourself, who are the cucks of Gates and the rest of them. Weird how that has turned around in the past 20 years.
Indeed, the 180º flip is remarkable IMHO and hard-to-miss.

Of course, you'd have to be older than a millennial to have noticed the turnaround.
 
Imagine if they included the Internet forums?

A PEW survey from March 2020 said 64% of white Americans who classify themselves as liberal or very liberal have been actually diagnosed with an actual mental health condition. 🤣
 
Is the minister required to allow a Islamic leader use of his platform to preach the word of Muhammad, and Allah for a portion of the service?

Can the minister say we do not preach Islam here, fuck off, and find a place that allows it?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/p...to-chant-islamic-supremacy-prayer-during-massNo one is saying REQUIRED. Think for a second. I clearly stated (I CLEARLY STATED) that when you offer up a platform for discussion, but dismiss certain viewpoints, it is censorship and you are not wanting the discussion. Therefore, do NOT offer up a forum for discussion of ideas if you do not want such to happen. If you simply want one talking point (CNN), then state as much... clearly state that you want Liberal talking points... that you are pro-vax, pro-gov't and pro-big tech... and that all other views will be censored. Every opposing viewer would at least respect that and avoid making those opposing talking points.
 
Back
Top