Gibson 498T - T stands for tele?

Music&Chaos

Music&Chaos

Well-known member
Hey all,

Title is a joke, of course.

After having a bit of an on/off relationship over the past several years with my Gibson 498T bridge pickup, I am totally into this pickup.

The only thing is, I tried it out in another guitar and it sounds MASSIVE.

At first, I figured it was due to the 500k pot hitting the bridge.

Swapped the pots in the Gibson. Helped it get closer to what it sounded like in the Tele I have, but not quite.

There was something in the body of the string itself I believe to have been missing when swapping.

After observing a short time, I noticed the huge difference:

The LP has the pole pieces pretty close to where the bridge and string contact is made, whereas on this tele, due to the unique bridge it came with, the pickup and pole pieces are much further away from the string/saddle contact point.

I also removed the cover from the pickup.tongive it a bit more open twang. Had a good cover so this has a neat mix of silver slugs with good pole pieces, which matches the gold/silver mix on the Tele anyway.

Absolutely killer sounding pickup for riffing out heavy chords and fat, aggressive lead work. Again, since the pickup has this high mid accentuated sound, it holds together better with better a little closer to the neck than normal. Other pickups could get kind of mushy on the Tele, but this stays nice and tight.

Has a low wound, high output single coil in the neck that sounds fat and clear. Goes very well with the 498T.

I thought it was an OK pickup in the Les Paul, definitely not bad, but it just screams and sings in the tele.

Photos for reference:
IMG_20250516_093003751.jpg

IMG_20250516_093030118.jpg
 
Absolutely killer sounding pickup for riffing out heavy chords and fat, aggressive lead work. Again, since the pickup has this high mid accentuated sound, it holds together better with better a little closer to the neck than normal. Other pickups could get kind of mushy on the Tele, but this stays nice and tight.
It sounded sweet in an ES through a Plexi Marshall IME as did the 490r. People bag on those pickups, but they are actually a pretty nice set for the kind of money they are asking compared to say, 57 classics.
 
It sounded sweet in an ES through a Plexi Marshall IME as did the 490r. People bag on those pickups, but they are actually a pretty nice set for the kind of money they are asking compared to say, 57 classics.
Part of the issue is really with the 300k pots. They make them sound wimpy and mushy. My LP has the 300k, but I did swap them with 500k cts, no tones, and one is a push/pull blower switch for bridge direct to out. Wiring is so much fun. I really, really need to take up side-work around here doing it or something.
 
Part of the issue is really with the 300k pots. They make them sound wimpy and mushy. My LP has the 300k, but I did swap them with 500k cts, no tones, and one is a push/pull blower switch for bridge direct to out. Wiring is so much fun. I really, really need to take up side-work around here doing it or something.
Honestly I didn't have a problem with mushiness or wimpiness with the Marshall, lol. They were factory pickups and pots in an ES333 I had bought and it kicked ass right out of the box through a 100 watt and an AX greenback cab.

That 498t had just a killer smoking and raunchy bite to it in the bridge of that guitar. Personally i have not met a common Gibson pickup model that I didn't find to be very usable so I def get the 498t love. It's a GREAT pickup. I have a 490r in the neck of my Viper based around previous good experiences with that set.
 
Tip one…do not use a soldering iron…use a map torch and a coat hanger with aluminum welding rods…. Stay tuned for more details later….
you laugh ....... I use a creme brule torch to do the pots on my guitars .... works friggin mint ..... but you have to be real quick
 
Back
Top