rsm
Well-known member
New India, formerly known as Canadastan (excluding a few of the western provinces), is going to have a fun time over the next several years. I'm looking forward to the coming entertainment...going to need to improve our northern border defenses, after the Mexican cartels are diminished / deleted.
I hope future US immigration laws will reflect this if Canadians try to emigrate to the USA.
edit:
Last edited:
rsm
Well-known member
Now the US needs to leave NATO, once we have established our presence in our new areas in Greenland (the Trumplands)
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
The Blazing Saddle
Banned
Well-known member
JamesTiberiusKirk 
The Cock. 
The Cock.
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
Which children did he rape? Post proof.
Minnesota should just accept the results of the election.
Minnesota should just accept the results of the election.
lol
Well-known member
Do they even care if they get caught anymore? There are people who have been arrested 50+ times still roaming the streets.
70 Mach 1
Well-known member
I think he put socialist Waltz in his place earlier today.
Lets see if MN calms down in the next few days
Lets see if MN calms down in the next few days
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Not a chance.
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
Release the Epstein files. Unredacted. There's the proof.
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
You might need to consult a dictionary.
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
The Clintons must not want them released, since they refuse to show up for court.
Zero outrage from you.
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
You obviously don't know real 4D chess when you see it. I doubt you have trouble recognizing checkers but that's another topic for another day.
If they take the Clintons to court, guess what document they have to release for discovery? Think hard, I've been mentioning it. Here, this is copy-pasta but I'm too tired to rehash it and I doubt I'd do a better job than this one...
THE CLINTON GAMBIT: Did They Just Trap the DOJ...
The political world gasped yesterday. But for once, it wasn't because of a scandal. It was because Bill and Hillary Clinton just looked the House Oversight Committee in the eye and effectively told them to go to hell. The subpoena demanded their presence for a closed door deposition regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Clintons didn't just decline. They sent a legal letter so scorching it practically burned the paper it was printed on.
The breakdown of the last 24 hours is simple. Chairman James Comer issued the summons, expecting the former power couple to fold or plead the Fifth. Instead, they refused to show up entirely. In response, the committee voted yesterday to hold them in contempt of Congress. But if Republicans think they just scored a victory, they might want to check the chessboard again. They may have just walked into a trap.
The rejection letter from the Clinton legal team was not standard boilerplate. It called the subpoenas "invalid" and "legally unenforceable." It accused the committee of harassment "untethered to a valid legislative purpose." This matches the sentiment of "eat sh*t" perfectly, though phrased in the polite brutality of high priced lawyers. They explicitly stated they would "forcefully defend" themselves.
Here is the core of their argument. It is actually a point that transparency advocates have been making for years. The Clintons argued that it is absurd for Congress to interrogate them about the Epstein files while the government is simultaneously refusing to release those very files. They asked a simple question. How can we testify about evidence you are hiding from us and the public?
This is where the strategy gets brilliant. Legal analysts are buzzing about a theory called "Forced Discovery." By refusing to testify, the Clintons are practically begging to be prosecuted. If the House refers them to the Department of Justice, and if the Trump DOJ actually decides to charge them with Contempt of Congress, the dynamic flips instantly.
Once they become criminal defendants, the game changes. In a criminal trial, the defense has broad rights to see the evidence against them. This is known as "discovery." If the government wants to put them in jail for what they know or didn't say about Epstein, the Clintons can argue that they cannot defend themselves without seeing the full, unredacted Epstein files.
It is the ultimate checkmate. To prosecute the Clintons, the Trump administration would have to hand over the documents they have been slow walking for a year. The Clintons are effectively holding a gun to the DOJ's head. They are saying, "Go ahead. Charge us. But if you do, you have to give us the files."
The irony is thick enough to cut with a knife. Republicans led by Comer want a show trial to embarrass the Clintons. But by pushing this contempt charge, they are handing Bill and Hillary the legal authority to demand the release of the most explosive secrets in Washington. The Clintons might be the only people with the security clearance and the legal standing to force these documents into the light.
This is high stakes poker played at the highest level. If the DOJ blinks and refuses to prosecute, the Clintons walk away looking untouchable. If the DOJ prosecutes, the files likely come out in court. Either way, the Clintons have managed to turn a subpoena into a weapon against the very committee trying to investigate them.
Whether you love them or loathe them, you have to admire the maneuver. They saw the trap set by the Oversight Committee and decided to spring it on purpose. Now the ball is in the DOJ's court. Do they want the Clintons in handcuffs enough to risk exposing every secret in the Epstein vault? We are about to find out just how much the government really wants us to know.
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
You don't understand the word unredacted? Want help? Or can you google it yourself?
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
The word "proof", you smug douche.
Your little copy pasta opinion piece theory posted above doesn't prove shit. Clintons playing political games as usual.
Bill and Hillary Clinton are some of the most corrupt politicians in American history. You have a short memory.
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
You're right. That was smug. Apologies. I know better.
Well, we all won't know if proof of Trump's rape is in the Epstein files until we look. So, let's have a look see. Trump's sure acting like there's proof. "Where there's smoke, there's an overweight pervert molesting children"
You want corruption? Trump moved Truman's "The Buck Stops Here" sign over to his wallet and changed it to "The Buck Goes Here". He's the Grifter In Chief.
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
So as usual, you start out OK, but then things go off the cliff.
You think DJT is guilty, based on "hunches" and "feelings" but that's not how things work unless you live in Salem in 1692.
Do i think he's guilty? I have no idea.
DJT moving a sign? I think it's dumb and tasteless, but that doesn't make him guilty of child rape.
JamesTiberiusKirk
Well-known member
It's more than hunches and feelings. Let's look for a pattern:
- he's a convicted sex offender.
- he disregards the concept of consent when he privately admitted that you can "grab 'em by the pussy" if your rich and powerful.
- he's made disgusting comments about his own daughter. that one offended me deeply. I have a daughter.
- he paid a hooker hush money - the same sex worker he boinked days after Malaria (the Slovenian sex worker who made good by marrying her one rich mark) gave birth to his 3rd son from his 3rd wife
That's just off the top of my head. The guy has shown us who he is, an amoral user of women for his own pleasure who doesn't care if they object. He was tight buddies with Epstein. He is refusing to release the files. Why? There is only one reason. Plus, if the files implicate Clinton you KNOW he'd rush them out - UNLESS - they implicated him even more.
And I'll apologize again for being a dick. I try to rise above the 8 year old insults that get bandied about here. I think all of us on the board are better than that. I know I won't change things but ya gotta try.
EDIT: The sign thing was a weak joke playing on Trump's love of bribes. I guess I need to retake comedy 101.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Most of this is just bullshit dude. Melania was a sex worker ? Spare me the faux outrage about your daughter when you say shit like that.
Similar threads
