Guess I'll miss TGP

[threadkiller]

Wanted to copy my post before they delete it over there

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillingerescaped View Post
I think Jugs is referring to ...well Dolly Parton and a certain....pair.......of body parts...and chugs was referring to Richie Sambora and his alcohol problems.

Not Racist, yes a little low, kind of funny when you say it aloud
Yes that was exactly what I was referring to. Never heard of chugs being a term for native americans. Guess just about anything you say these days will offend someone. Feel free to be offended.

BTW, I am some small fraction Indian. Great, great grandmother or something was full blooded Cherokee, I'm told. Yes, that's right indian, not native american or any other PC term. I'm very proud of my origins. Apparently it's not enough to qualify me for a bunch of free government money.

I still call Washington's football team the Redskins.

My wife is full blooded Thai so I make sure that my daughter checks the box that says Asian on any forms or applications. Doesn't pay to be white in America.

Also, newsflash. Muslims are the ones committing terrorists acts around the globe. Nobody has the balls to say this of course. Has to be "radicals" or "extremists" or "Jihadists" or some other bullshit term.

Also, white police officers are occasionally killed by unarmed assailants, sometimes dare I say.... black (gasp) ...... assailants who are able to obtain there service weapon or otherwise overpower them during a struggle. This of course, is not newsworthy.


Good day. I'll enjoy my ban



Here's the thread until they take it down.

https://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... ?t=1525022

 

[cardinal]

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

 

[Soulstealer]

That is ridiculous and par for the course over there. Had never heard that term before in my life. Why would he think that, anyways? What even implied Native American in that clip?

 

[Soulstealer]

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

We have a medical college here, and I used to think there was some sort of Asian heritage center located there. In Maine.

 

[threadkiller]

Apparently "chugs" is considered a racist anti-native american term by some. I was referring to Sambora's alcohol history. It was just a joke on the Dolly Parton and Sambora clip someone put up. I called it Jugs and Chugs.

BTW I haven't been banned yet that I know of, haven't checked but I'm sure it's coming. Only regret would be access to the classifieds.

 

[Soulstealer]

I know, but why would the Parton/Sambora=Native American connection even be made?


Oh jesus....now someone is saying jugs is sexist, and what doesn't that concern anyone.

Concern......


Fucking PC idiots. I hope their thin little pansy skins get offended to the fullest.

 

[J-Rodger]

Just PM big mike gHey pRon and offer him naked Dumble pic's and a BJ, you'll be fine.

You wont miss TGP believe me.

Everyone there cowers in fear and wont say what they really want to.

T-he

G-ay

P-eople

 

[rlord1974]

That prose, grammar and use of coloured acronyms is familiar. Welcome back, Charveldan.

 

[xzyryabx]

I didn't mean chugs in the racist way...
how dare you call me a racist?!!
but them muslims, man, every last one of em is a damn terrorist.....amiright?!!

 

[jcj]

I didn't mean chugs in the racist way...
how dare you call me a racist?!!
but them muslims, man, every last one of em is a damn terrorist.....amiright?!!

Yeah...OP was doing fine, right up until he wasn't....

I actually laughed out loud, as I kept reading.

 

[stephen sawall]

There is plenty of terrorists other than from that religion. Ever hear of Ireland ? The FBI states that only 6% of terrorism is committed by Muslims in this century..... 94% are non Muslim. The last century it was a smaller number.
Most people do not even know what the term "terrorists" means.
Besides that would not be racist because Muslims are every race..... Just like every other major religion they have members of every race.

Personally I find people that are offended by words kind of goofy ...... There is plenty of things in this world much more offensive.

 

[thiswaythatway]

There's a lot of thin skinned cunts over there but still, there's a lot of cool knowledgeable people in in the forums. Ask a pedal question here and get 3 replies, over there you'll get 20.

 

[lespaul6]

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

Youre both right... the over representation was the result of what the OP was mentioning and the recent pull back is the reaction to that fact.

OP you have good taste in women!

 

[Badronald]

Man, that thread is hilarious.
What a hatchet job.

 

[eco70777]

my wife is black, my mother is white and i look yellow.
Want to call me a spic because i was raised in a Spanish talking country? Go ahead, why would i care?


Why the fuck do you guys let the USA government dictate all you have to say?
In the end it is not about been polite, it is about disintegrating the tribal sense and to make people "unique individuals"

I guess it is easier to have lambs to be able to have a leash on than to have thinking individuals that can cause problems.

In this country, everyone is what was called a "calié" in a dictatorship in the Caribbean in the 1940's.
Caliés work was to call the special forces and rat on anyone.

I think this is what they want in the future, individuals who are caliés.

 

[sahlomonic]

Why did you tempt me to go over there and toss another log in the fire? Answer? Maybe I just need to be banned. I can't voluntarily stop visiting, so may as well earn a vacation lol

 

[ubermetaldood]

TGP and Seymour Duncan suck suck equally, and are both run by and chock full of hypocrite, liberal douchebags. I hate Seymour Duncan most for their tolerance (or more like support) of anti-American sentiment, Marxism, and flamboyant liberalism. I enjoy the company in an international community (being an international man and speaking in two other languages myself), but I won't tolerate someone badmouthing my country; especially when the core of America is still the greatest country on Earth.

If I can recall correctly, TGP started out with some kind of Christian affiliation or something. I guess they abandoned Jesus when they started getting endorsements. Anyway, I don't know if they consider themselves conservative there, but they CERTAINLY act like intolerant, liberal pricks. If they consider themselves conservative, they should be ostracized from the conservative population because they certainly don't operate like us.

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

Sorry but you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Asians aren't over-represented. They've always been a small and slowly increasing minority in this country, and the main reason they are held to higher standards is because they don't rely on entitlements and hold themselves to a higher standard. On the other hand, if you technically want to discuss over-representation of minorities, then you need to consider the black population. Most people have no idea that the actual black population of the United States is only around 13-14%. Judging from everything on television, from advertisements to programming, the typical American or foreigner believes the black population of the U.S. is between 25% and 50%. If you don't believe that, then survey random Americans or foreigners on the street and ask them how much of the population they think is composed of black (of "African-American" to throw the politically correct term around).

White people are no longer a majority, and if anything, the most over-represented because most people believe that white people still outweigh everyone else. Our Hispanic population is nearly equal to the white population now. If you study government from the civil rights era until now, you will see that the government has put into place specific, expansive programs targeted at changing the physical make-up of the population. The aim of these programs is to reduce the white population and increase the black population. Asians, Native Americans, and Hispanics are not considered in these plans.

Take a look in any American classroom and interview any American student and see for yourself what part of American history they are most familiar with. These government integration programs are specifically aimed at any urban or suburban where there is a majority white population. This integration program is far more expansive and invasive than people are even aware of. Aside from the aforementioned, I'll present you with a couple of more stunning facts.

35% of the entire black population are employed by federal and state government. If black people are only 14% of the population, consider that ratio compared to any other race. Programs such as Obamacare and Obama's new proposal to provide *free* ("free" is a lie because it costs every taxpayer) are specifically aimed at increasing and empowering particularly the black population. Yes that may be a shocking comment to some of you, but when is the last time you or even most congressmen poured over Obamacare law pages? I've toiled through it more than most Americans and certainly more than Nancy Pelosi and can tell you that it's not hard to connect the dots.

The fact is that you should be more informed and not take things at face value because these are some of the truths facing us right now and if people were aware of and understood them, there would be outrage. Like I said, I'm presenting you with facts you can research your self. These programs, under the guise of "desegregation" (i.e. Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, etc...), are really "re-population" programs. If anyone is short-changed when it comes to government bias, it's Hispanic, Asian and Native American.

 

[sytharnia1560]

this picture just made my day .... be back in a minute

is that the girl in your avatar???

 

[cardinal]

TGP and Seymour Duncan suck suck equally, and are both run by and chock full of hypocrite, liberal douchebags. I hate Seymour Duncan most for their tolerance (or more like support) of anti-American sentiment, Marxism, and flamboyant liberalism. I enjoy the company in an international community (being an international man and speaking in two other languages myself), but I won't tolerate someone badmouthing my country; especially when the core of America is still the greatest country on Earth.

If I can recall correctly, TGP started out with some kind of Christian affiliation or something. I guess they abandoned Jesus when they started getting endorsements. Anyway, I don't know if they consider themselves conservative there, but they CERTAINLY act like intolerant, liberal pricks. If they consider themselves conservative, they should be ostracized from the conservative population because they certainly don't operate like us.

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

Sorry but you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Asians aren't over-represented. They've always been a small and slowly increasing minority in this country, and the main reason they are held to higher standards is because they don't rely on entitlements and hold themselves to a higher standard. On the other hand, if you technically want to discuss over-representation of minorities, then you need to consider the black population. Most people have no idea that the actual black population of the United States is only around 13-14%. Judging from everything on television, from advertisements to programming, the typical American or foreigner believes the black population of the U.S. is between 25% and 50%. If you don't believe that, then survey random Americans or foreigners on the street and ask them how much of the population they think is composed of black (of "African-American" to throw the politically correct term around).

White people are no longer a majority, and if anything, the most over-represented because most people believe that white people still outweigh everyone else. Our Hispanic population is nearly equal to the white population now. If you study government from the civil rights era until now, you will see that the government has put into place specific, expansive programs targeted at changing the physical make-up of the population. The aim of these programs is to reduce the white population and increase the black population. Asians, Native Americans, and Hispanics are not considered in these plans.

Take a look in any American classroom and interview any American student and see for yourself what part of American history they are most familiar with. These government integration programs are specifically aimed at any urban or suburban where there is a majority white population. This integration program is far more expansive and invasive than people are even aware of. Aside from the aforementioned, I'll present you with a couple of more stunning facts.

35% of the entire black population are employed by federal and state government. If black people are only 14% of the population, consider that ratio compared to any other race. Programs such as Obamacare and Obama's new proposal to provide *free* ("free" is a lie because it costs every taxpayer) are specifically aimed at increasing and empowering particularly the black population. Yes that may be a shocking comment to some of you, but when is the last time you or even most congressmen poured over Obamacare law pages? I've toiled through it more than most Americans and certainly more than Nancy Pelosi and can tell you that it's not hard to connect the dots.

The fact is that you should be more informed and not take things at face value because these are some of the truths facing us right now and if people were aware of and understood them, there would be outrage. Like I said, I'm presenting you with facts you can research your self. These programs, under the guise of "desegregation" (i.e. Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, etc...), are really "re-population" programs. If anyone is short-changed when it comes to government bias, it's Hispanic, Asian and Native American.

I admit that I didn't read even most of this rant, but I'm pretty sure that the % of Asian/Pacific Islanders at major universities is higher than the % of them in the population at large. So they now appear to be held to higher admissions standards. There are a number of lawsuits against schools for this. Whatever else you're ranting about doesn't seem related to the limited point I made.

Edit: here is he result of a quick google search:

"Although Asian-Americans represent less than 5 percent of the US population (and slightly more than 5 percent in Massachusetts), they make up as much as 20 percent of students at many highly selective private research universities – the kind of schools that make it into top 50 national rankings. But, critics charge, Asian-American students would constitute an even larger share if many weren’t being filtered out during the admissions process."

http://www.boston.com/news/education/hi ... p_schools/

 

[ubermetaldood]

TGP and Seymour Duncan suck suck equally, and are both run by and chock full of hypocrite, liberal douchebags. I hate Seymour Duncan most for their tolerance (or more like support) of anti-American sentiment, Marxism, and flamboyant liberalism. I enjoy the company in an international community (being an international man and speaking in two other languages myself), but I won't tolerate someone badmouthing my country; especially when the core of America is still the greatest country on Earth.

If I can recall correctly, TGP started out with some kind of Christian affiliation or something. I guess they abandoned Jesus when they started getting endorsements. Anyway, I don't know if they consider themselves conservative there, but they CERTAINLY act like intolerant, liberal pricks. If they consider themselves conservative, they should be ostracized from the conservative population because they certainly don't operate like us.

for what it's worth, checking "Asian/Pacific Islander" on college applications, for example, might make it harder than declaring as simply Caucasian. You can look into it yourself, but basically Asians at colleges are "over represented" relative to their numbers in the general population, so they tend to be held to higher admissions standards.

Trust me, for that and many other reasons, it does "pay to be white" in the US.

Sorry but you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Asians aren't over-represented. They've always been a small and slowly increasing minority in this country, and the main reason they are held to higher standards is because they don't rely on entitlements and hold themselves to a higher standard. On the other hand, if you technically want to discuss over-representation of minorities, then you need to consider the black population. Most people have no idea that the actual black population of the United States is only around 13-14%. Judging from everything on television, from advertisements to programming, the typical American or foreigner believes the black population of the U.S. is between 25% and 50%. If you don't believe that, then survey random Americans or foreigners on the street and ask them how much of the population they think is composed of black (of "African-American" to throw the politically correct term around).

White people are no longer a majority, and if anything, the most over-represented because most people believe that white people still outweigh everyone else. Our Hispanic population is nearly equal to the white population now. If you study government from the civil rights era until now, you will see that the government has put into place specific, expansive programs targeted at changing the physical make-up of the population. The aim of these programs is to reduce the white population and increase the black population. Asians, Native Americans, and Hispanics are not considered in these plans.

Take a look in any American classroom and interview any American student and see for yourself what part of American history they are most familiar with. These government integration programs are specifically aimed at any urban or suburban where there is a majority white population. This integration program is far more expansive and invasive than people are even aware of. Aside from the aforementioned, I'll present you with a couple of more stunning facts.

35% of the entire black population are employed by federal and state government. If black people are only 14% of the population, consider that ratio compared to any other race. Programs such as Obamacare and Obama's new proposal to provide *free* ("free" is a lie because it costs every taxpayer) are specifically aimed at increasing and empowering particularly the black population. Yes that may be a shocking comment to some of you, but when is the last time you or even most congressmen poured over Obamacare law pages? I've toiled through it more than most Americans and certainly more than Nancy Pelosi and can tell you that it's not hard to connect the dots.

The fact is that you should be more informed and not take things at face value because these are some of the truths facing us right now and if people were aware of and understood them, there would be outrage. Like I said, I'm presenting you with facts you can research your self. These programs, under the guise of "desegregation" (i.e. Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, etc...), are really "re-population" programs. If anyone is short-changed when it comes to government bias, it's Hispanic, Asian and Native American.

I admit that I didn't read even most of this rant, but I'm pretty sure that the % of Asian/Pacific Islanders at major universities is higher than the % of them in the population at large. So they now appear to be held to higher admissions standards. There are a number of lawsuits against schools for this. Whatever else you're ranting about doesn't seem related to the limited point I made.

Edit: here is he result of a quick google search:

"Although Asian-Americans represent less than 5 percent of the US population (and slightly more than 5 percent in Massachusetts), they make up as much as 20 percent of students at many highly selective private research universities – the kind of schools that make it into top 50 national rankings. But, critics charge, Asian-American students would constitute an even larger share if many weren’t being filtered out during the admissions process."

http://www.boston.com/news/education/hi ... p_schools/

You said "over represented" and "held to higher admissions standards" so you should have stated your opinion more clearly. Asians aren't held to higher admissions standards. They're simply held to the same standards everyone should be. Populations which colleges and universities believe are underrepresented either lower the admissions standards or use "other considerations" to admit more of them. If you said that they were held to higher standards than certain other minority populations, then you would be right in the sense that their standards aren't being lowered for them.

There are many reasons why standards aren't standards for everyone. First, certain minority are admitted into colleges though they don't have the basic reading, writing and math skills they need to even graduate high school. Second, colleges have to show that they are enrolling and graduating certain percentages of minority populations in order to not be considered bias. Asians are a very small minority, so their relative populations are much smaller. Therefore, it's not like colleges are trying to reduce their enrollment numbers. Shit, I have to go to work so I'll leave it at that.