7 Stringer
Well-known member
GLXD16 all the way. Had mine for years and it is amazing. Never ever had an issue. Battery life is amazing and the tuner is perfect. Tone is better than a cable too,imo, very crisp and clear.
Gooooo
Gooooo
Brootz
Member
I guess I'll be that guy.
I had a GLDX 16 for a while and initially loved it. I was skeptical about the band it was operating in (2.4 ghz is very crowded) but never had a problem. About a year ago I started having interference issues on stage.....especially in the busier venues. Tried re-scanning and re-syncing to no avail. It just went from OK to crap inside of about 2 months. It was beginning to affect our shows, and during a couple I had to switch over to a cable.
Long story short, I replaced it with a Shure PGXD14 running in the 900mhz range and all of my issues disappeared.
Moving forward I won't buy another wireless that operates in 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz. Those frequencies are just too crowded.
I had a GLDX 16 for a while and initially loved it. I was skeptical about the band it was operating in (2.4 ghz is very crowded) but never had a problem. About a year ago I started having interference issues on stage.....especially in the busier venues. Tried re-scanning and re-syncing to no avail. It just went from OK to crap inside of about 2 months. It was beginning to affect our shows, and during a couple I had to switch over to a cable.
Long story short, I replaced it with a Shure PGXD14 running in the 900mhz range and all of my issues disappeared.
Moving forward I won't buy another wireless that operates in 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz. Those frequencies are just too crowded.
Smash
Hack
I have heard a lot of good things about the pgx. I haven't had any issues with my glx, but if I do, may go to the pgx. Shure has definitely earned my return business.