thegame
Well-known member
You’re describing my underwear drawerJust depends
You’re describing my underwear drawerJust depends
I look at shit now compared to 1985…. Fuck bwah…. Quality cheap gear, information and education opportunities out the ass…. I remember trying to hurry and learn a riff from a bud or show them a riff before school was out. Guitar world or gftpm and tab books. That was it. And in my area you couldn’t get gftpm….I see YT as a way to see how gear sounds, mostly I find people talk too much but you just click ahead so who cares. When I was in my 20s the only thing you had was a ($20 in today’s money) magazine that maybe had a dozen ‘reviews’ of mostly crap you didn’t care about. So to me YT is magic—but I hear what Dan is saying
I see YT as a way to see how gear sounds, mostly I find people talk too much but you just click ahead so who cares. When I was in my 20s the only thing you had was a ($20 in today’s money) magazine that maybe had a dozen ‘reviews’ of mostly crap you didn’t care about. So to me YT is magic—but I hear what Dan is saying
Yup you had to actually talk to people in order to learn anything. I guess it toughened us up — no one I knew lived at home/with their parents after 18.I look at shit now compared to 1985…. Fuck bwah…. Quality cheap gear, information and education opportunities out the ass…. I remember trying to hurry and learn a riff from a bud or show them a riff before school was out. Guitar world or gftpm and tab books. That was it. And in my area you couldn’t get gftpm….
Too buku lolI think he was trying to say this:
![]()
I will say, playing anything remotely captivating a cappella with the restrictions they have on YT is no easy thing to do. But I agree, very little interest in even finding out. I do wish that when people do a demo of an overdrive they don’t run it into a spanking clean Fender DR.This is exactly how I view them. I skip through 95% of the talking unless it’s someone I share some playing/tone commonalities with or I know they’ve got the experience to make a qualified statement about how a piece of gear could work in different situations. Andy Wood, Ben Eller, Pete Thorn, Ola and Jon from Sonic Drive are pretty much it. I also watch a good amount of John Cordy’s vids because I love his playing, but the verbal content generally gets skipped.
I have zero interest in how gear sounds in isolation, I want to know what it’ll do in a studio or on a stage and I think it’s fairly obvious once someone dials in a tone on an amp or pedal if they’ve got experience outside of the house, there’s a few popular geartubers who dial in so much distortion and cut so many mids the tones wouldn’t work anywhere but in the bedroom/living room.
Too buku lol
The other john browne is a whole hell of a lot cooler than the "og" john browne
Gear youtube is like a ouroboros where shittiest hobbyists create an audience so them and the gear companies can make money off the other hobbyists - it's honestly gross and probably most of the reason why music sucks a big fat donkey dick right now
seriously the only people who disagree are the gear youtubers themselves, because they know where there bread is buttered
I was reminded of something today that is sort of in relation to this post. I went to school with this person, although I didn't know him very well. I knew he was a composer, mostly in the choral music field (one of the fields I like to write in as well). About a year ago, I noticed he now has a huge youtube channel. I was initially excited when I saw this, but then I clicked on and listened to a few of his videos and I realized it was not all that great. I just don't get the reactionary videos and why people love them. Maybe it's just meeting people where they are, but what does this say about us? Sort of like how it's easy and tasty to eat at McDonalds -- but where's the nutrition? This came up on my recommended vids today;
On the other hand though, I get it. It's really difficult to make a living as a composer these days and composers have been turning to YT and other paths to make ends meet. I even have my own music theory channel, although I haven't yet put a lot of energy into it. I update it as often as I feel inspired to do so. But I don't put out content that is a reaction -- I find that stuff just very watered down.
I was reminded of something today that is sort of in relation to this post. I went to school with this person, although I didn't know him very well. I knew he was a composer, mostly in the choral music field (one of the fields I like to write in as well). About a year ago, I noticed he now has a huge youtube channel. I was initially excited when I saw this, but then I clicked on and listened to a few of his videos and I realized it was not all that great. I just don't get the reactionary videos and why people love them. Maybe it's just meeting people where they are, but what does this say about us? Sort of like how it's easy and tasty to eat at McDonalds -- but where's the nutrition? This came up on my recommended vids today;
On the other hand though, I get it. It's really difficult to make a living as a composer these days and composers have been turning to YT and other paths to make ends meet. I even have my own music theory channel, although I haven't yet put a lot of energy into it. I update it as often as I feel inspired to do so. But I don't put out content that is a reaction -- I find that stuff just very watered down.