If You Can't Buy One, Build One - "CCV" style

  • Thread starter Thread starter scottosan
  • Start date Start date
sah5150":366jfgve said:
psychodave":366jfgve said:
sah5150":366jfgve said:
psychodave":366jfgve said:
scottosan":366jfgve said:
negaodapicona":366jfgve said:
The funny part is:

You are building a CCV and Mark Cameron can't do it!!!

:lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL:
im sure he can. I am only doing one. Big difference than going into mass production

Exactly. One reason is Mark would end up tweaking every amp differently since part values will be different and create slightly different tones. Kinda like how Marshall amps all sound different. Mark likes to make sure all amps sound good, not just a few. It's a curse.
This is a little confusing to me. The CCV is a PCB amp with short flying leads. If you use 5% components of the same type in the same positions in every amp, they should all sound pretty much the same. I can say for sure that my amps sound almost identical from amp to amp. The variance is certainly not enough that you couldn't make them sound identical with minor EQ changes.

I totally get that Marshall mods would be tweaked by ear because you are changing a lot of leads and there were component switches all the time that also have big variances, And even a lot of the older PCB Marshalls have long leads and the lead dress varied from amp to amp. But with PCB amps like the CCV, huge variance from amp to amp requiring tweaking doesn't make any sense to me, unless you aren't using high tolerance components consistently from amp to amp. And not doing that doesn't make any sense to me either... If you don't do that, then you aren't building a "production" amp.

Steve

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you use a 5% tolerance on a 100k resistor, you could potentially get a 95k resistor or a 105k resistor. The difference could be 10k just on that one part between two different amps. Work that across dozens of resistors, capacitors, potentiometers, transformers and things can vary. In my original post, I never said amps will be completely different, I said slightly. This is where, IMO, Mark shines to make amps sound good to him.

Notice you didn't say amps would sound EXACTLY the same. ;)
Of course it is going to vary, but not enough that it should require tweaking component values. That was my point. You are going to have variance that is going to cancel things out in different places as well. In my experience, using 5% components in a PCB amp with short flying leads should make them sound so close to each other that simple EQ changes would make them sound identical. This is certainly true of my amps and that is what I like about PCB...

I think the need to tweak has more to do with the fact that Mark often used whatever he had on hand for parts, which would make a larger difference. Hell, the CCV I owned had a computer power supply in it for some DC heater implementation, which I presume wasn't part of the original design... not that I'm suggesting that particular change impacted the sound of the amp (except reducing hum)...

Either way, the CCVs I've played all sounded great to me and I could get them all dialed in to sound the way I wanted them to, so whatever he was doing worked. It would just seem that you'd want to mass produce them to have any reasonable shot at success and that means you can't sit there and tweak each amp. You've got to figure out a way to build them with greater consistency from amp to amp and I see no reason why that couldn't have happened...

Steve

I would agree with this... I mean if you really want to split hairs then the actual metal used in each transformer is different so every amp will sound different and so on ....
 
I have not been over on sloclone for a long time, will have to check back in there to follow the build thread!
 
vultures":1ozb9dhg said:
JerEvil":1ozb9dhg said:
vultures":1ozb9dhg said:
I love these threads. I would love to build one, don't even want to keep it, just want to build one.
Cool! I'll buy it... you build it then send it to me!

Don't say it if you don't mean it :lol: :LOL: :cheers2:
Look man, I am gonna ask the OP for the parts list! LOL!

Just joined the Sloclone forum...
 
Whowantsamustache":3awze9m1 said:
I think the whole Cameron Amp thing is a joke. The guy clearly can't handle an honest days work. You got amateurs on this forum building amps in days/weeks with amazing quality and detail.

Then you got this sucker free gear dude who teams up with Cameron and still can't get shit done. Now they are resorting to Kemper profiles. Really dudes? What a joke.
Let's not let this thread turn to shit, huh? It's not about Mark or his business practices.
 
LP Freak":1vz83s6q said:
Whowantsamustache":1vz83s6q said:
I think the whole Cameron Amp thing is a joke. The guy clearly can't handle an honest days work. You got amateurs on this forum building amps in days/weeks with amazing quality and detail.

Then you got this sucker free gear dude who teams up with Cameron and still can't get shit done. Now they are resorting to Kemper profiles. Really dudes? What a joke.
Let's not let this thread turn to shit, huh? It's not about Mark or his business practices.
agreed. I don't know about you all, but i have enough drama in my own breathing space and my own issues to address before I start getting up in someoneelses business.

Yes, I am building an amp, but not for a moment do I underestimate the business aspect of what goes into it nor would I expect anyone else to go through the drama of owning a business catering to musicians. Mark is extremely talented and has a great ear for tone and I am fine leaving it at that.
 
What did you settle on for main and screen filters? Looking at the schematics floating around they are 2x100uf in series, however looking at gut shots of the last runs they are 2x180uf in series.
 
The first run used 180uf in series for the screens. The second run used 220uf. I'm using 220uf
 
scottosan":3nfk33i4 said:
The first run used 180uf in series for the screens. The second run used 220uf. I'm using 220uf


Curious if the value difference can be both "felt" and "heard"...?
 
Just curious, but how close to a King Kong will this be? Isn't a King Kong supposed to be CCV based?
 
lespaul6":4zl49w0e said:
scottosan":4zl49w0e said:
The first run used 180uf in series for the screens. The second run used 220uf. I'm using 220uf


Curious if the value difference can be both "felt" and "heard"...?

Going from 180uf (actually 90uf in series) to 220uf (110uf in series), would be very little difference.

Not sure why he used 180uf at one time, was he splitting hairs? or perhaps he just really got a good deal on them?
 
SpiderWars":2r94oiff said:
Just curious, but how close to a King Kong will this be? Isn't a King Kong supposed to be CCV based?
based on what I've seen, the 2 public schematics and what I've seen on the KK has several noteable and common errors. Not to mention the lack of high voltage option on the KK contributed to its lack of tightness
 
Have to verify continuity and component values, wire in the board, validate again, install coax runs and relay, test voltages, and almost there.


FullSizeRender+31.jpg
 
Okay, Unofficially finished at 2:00am this morning but had a few issues. Ran into some hum and pretty serious volume drop, When troubleshooting that noticed issues with channel switching. switched relay sockets and the problem followed the relay. Good deal, not my fault, stole a relay from the BE100 clone. Almost 2:30am now had to get up for work at 5:30am, so simply pulled the PI tube to decouple the preamp from the power amp and the hum still existed. Decided that the sleep deprivation wasn't going to help so I went to bed. Up in 3 hours go to work absolutely worthless...5 Monster Energy drinks later and send the wife on errands and within 10 minutes found that the 100k in the phase inverter was measuring all over the place, except for anywhere near 100K. Swapped it out and there she goes in all of her glory. The switches sure add alot of flexibility to the amp and the kids just went to bed, so hopefully get some quality time tomorrow and some clips.

FullSizeRender+32.jpg

IMG_3291.JPG

IMG_3292.JPG
 
Looks fantastic! The WIMAs just always look odd to me but the important thing is how they sound in the amp. Looking forward to hearing how it turned out.

I also need to get it in gear and get something done, I think you've done two amps in the time I've been working on one (really simple) pedal build lol
 
technomancer":13eu7i15 said:
Looks fantastic! The WIMAs just always look odd to me but the important thing is how they sound in the amp. Looking forward to hearing how it turned out.

I also need to get it in gear and get something done, I think you've done two amps in the time I've been working on one (really simple) pedal build lol
The Brad run used WIMA's in alot of positions. I like them in the lower spec spots as well 100pf to 1000pf as I think they are much smoother that ceramic and more reliable than MICA. Plus I ca get 5% tolerance in most values at a good price
 
Reall nice work! Happy to see someone build an amp the real way! :thumbsup:
Do you mind if I ask where you find these tiny turrets that hold the relay sockets? I've been searching for these without luck.

/Henric
 
Back
Top