Artjr
Well-known member
If it wasn't stolen, this country has too many fucking idiots
Tonelover
Well-known member
So you're saying there's a chance it wasn't stolen? I'll consider that progress. Well done, I'm sure that was hard to say.
ccn
Well-known member
Went right over your head as usual , do you not understand what this is all about ?
Georgia prosecutors have withheld exculpatory evidence from the defendant's just like J6 defendants and they bribe other defendants with reduced sentences or with money to testify FALSELY against the target defendant.
As plea bargaining takes over from jury trials, as it has, the investigative work that is the basis for the indictment is not tested by judge and jury. Georgia prosecutors have no case, everybody knows it but through lawfare the public presumes that the prosecutor has a case, and the prosecutor uses the media to create a presumption of guilt.
Newspaper and television reports from anonymous leaks from the prosecutor’s office which are always happening in this case are preceded by the phrase “according to sources familiar with the investigation,” create a presumption of guilt, reducing the defendant’s chance of an objective jury. It would be unusual for a jury to find innocent a person already convicted in the media.
The pressure builds as the prosecutor speaks of expanding the investigation to family, friends and employees, this is exactly what Robert Mueller did even threatening to destroy the lives of the defendants children to get the defendant to falsely accuse Trump of crimes he is completely innocent of . In RICO cases like this one the prosecutor can freeze the defendant’s assets, making it impossible for him to pay his attorneys.
That's why you see so many pleas. When the defendant loses all hope of a fair, or affordable, trial, a deal is brokered , Biden's department of Justice is notorious for bankrupting many completely innocent people who simply do not have the funds to prove their innocence .
When the defendant, his attorney, and the prosecutor stand before the judge, the judge asks for assurance that the plea was voluntary and no deals prompted it, and he is given assurance. Judges, clerks, defense attorneys, persecutors, the defendant all are parties to the lie.
It is nonsense to expect honesty and justice to characterize a process that bases conviction on plea bargains. Psychological pressure, indeed torture, and exhaustion of the defendant’s resources replace evidence.
Under a plea bargaining regime, law is no longer a shield of the people. It is a weapon against the people in the hands of government. The administration of justice ceases. Prosecutors become copies of Andrei Vyshinsky.
Jack smith is just as corrupt as Robert Mueller was .
Robert Mueller’s Sordid History Of Illicitly Targeting Innocent People
https://newswithviews.com/robert-muellers-sordid-history-of-illicitly-targeting-innocent-people/Robert Mueller’s Modus Operandi: Intimidation And Destruction
https://newswithviews.com/robert-muellers-modus-operandi-intimidation-and-destruction/Fire, Indict And Prosecute Political Hack Robert Mueller: Says Former Federal Prosecutor
https://newswithviews.com/fire-indi...obert-mueller-says-former-federal-prosecutor/
Tonelover
Well-known member
Yes I understand what it's about. It's about a lying money grubbing hoebag who will say anything for a buck and is now crying because she ruined her life by being such a stupid bitch.
Stripped Rights
Well-known member
ccn
Well-known member
Are you telling me you're completely unaware of all the non right wing people who have said this is banana republic nonsense ? How can that be ? I'll tell you exactly why that is , the ONLY explanation for it is your news sources are 100% mainstream media sources . You do understand that all the mainstream networks are connected and run the exact same narratives don't you ? Do you really think the mainstream media is going to report on people who are on their own side who have strongly criticized this ridiculous prosecution ? NOT A CHANCE IN HELL .
Time to take a look outside of legacy media .
The mainstream media never ever reported on anything that made Trump look good . Not even the below was covered .
I remember liberals demanding for Wikileaks to release documents on Trump and Assange shut them up pretty quickly with the below comment LOL.
Are you aware that no charges of any kind were even being contemplated UNTIL Trump decided to run again . Yup
JackBootedThug
MURDERATOR
She thicc as a bowl of oatmeal…
P
paulyc
Well-known member
Crying bitch.
thegame
Well-known member
The resemblance to Stormy Daniels is striking. Oh, not so much in facial appearance but in doing anything for money.
ccn
Well-known member
Georgia Prosecutor And Judge May Have Broken The Law Sentencing Jenna Ellis
Enter the circus tent. The show's about to start...
TRUMPED UP CHARGES AGAINST TRUMP LAWYER ELLIS
*footnotes can be found at the bottom of the post
Today I’m going to get right into it. The Georgia prosecutors likely fabricated fake charges against Jenna Ellis, which she willingly took. The charges are related to Trump challenging the 2020 election results in Georgia.
side note: for a great deep dive into how the Left completely upended election integrity and created vulnerabilities that are exploited to win elections, Our Broken Elections by Hans Von Spakovsky is a must-read.
According to a transcript of the court proceeding of her indictment, Ellis was charged with “aiding and abetting false statements and writings under accusation 23SC190514”. [1]
It is noteworthy that both the charging document and the actual citation of the law are completely absent from the whole proceeding. I searched Fulton County’s records for Jenna Ellis’s trial and came up with a 23SC188947 document, which is different from the aforementioned document. [3]
So in the absense of the actual charging documents, I must speculate what the Georgia code was that was used for the charge.
Considering the prosecutor for Fulton County stated “The false statements were made with reckless disregard of the truth and what, and with conspicuous purpose to avoid learning the truth”, [1] we can say the charges are most likely related to § 16-10-20 of the 2020 Georgia Code Title 16 Article 2
However, these charges must prove willful attempts to push information the party knew was false. The Georgia code states the following under § 16-10-20:
“A person who knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or makes or uses any false writing or document, knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of state government or of the government of any county, city, or other political subdivision of this state shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years, or both.” [2]
The problem is, Ellis’s own statement proves she did not knowingly do any of the above. In fact, she said that she believed the statements were true at the time.
She says in her statement to the court:
“What I did not do, but should have done, Your Honor, was to make sure that the facts the other lawyers alleged to be true were in fact true. In the frenetic pace of attempting to raise challenges to the election in several states, including Georgia, I failed to do my due diligence. I believe in and I value election integrity. If I knew then what I know now, I would have declined to represent Donald Trump in these post election challenges.” [1]
The Georgia Code states a party must KNOWINGLY spread untrue statements. Ellis did not KNOWINGLY do that.
She said “If I knew then what I know now, I would have declined to represent Donald Trump in these post election challenges.”
So, if the basis of these charges is § 16-10-20, then there is no case. She didn’t knowingly do anything. The charges are bunk.
But what’s even more interesting is the fine itself violates the very law likely used to charge Ellis. The court transcript shows she was charged a fine of $5,000. [1] The law states the fine cannot exceed $1,000. So, if § 16-10-20 is the law being used here, the judge literally broke the law while sentencing Ellis.
However, it gets worse. Ellis was also charged with 5 years’ probation. The judge literally states “On the sole count of aiding and abetting false statements and writings, the sentence would be five years probation.” [1]
Please tell me where in the world that is present in § 16-10-20 of the Georgia Legal Code? Hint: It isn’t.
In fact, I would love to know where that charge is present anywhere at all with that sentence in the entire Georgia Legal Code since it is certainly not in § 16-10-20.
In the interest of being factually accurate, I did my due diligence. I searched left and right for any possible other law that could be used here. But all of the $5,000 charges I found were for fraud, bribery, theft, etc. [4] Not one was for aiding and abetting untrue statements. So far as I can tell, only § 16-10-20 is the Georgia Code section covering aiding and abetting untrue statements.
So it appears that the judge, prosecutor, Fulton County DA’s office, and even Ellis herself are all unaware of what the law actually says.
And the judge and prosecutor also therefore may have unknowingly broken the very same law they likely didn’t even properly consult.
How incompetent can things possibly get?
https://johnpaluska.substack.com/p/georgia-prosecutor-and-judge-may#§todays-substack