
TheToneDig
Active member
You do realize anecdotal stories don't really mean anything other than you like the taste of some ice-cream flavor and not this other one?We put a SLO30 against a common Peavey 5150 block logo and the difference was massive. The 5150 ate it for breakfast not in volume but character and tonal preference. Not a single person in the room thought the SLO30 sounded better. The next day my friend had no problem selling the SLO30 for a profit.
Like why should I believe your story over a story that goes the other way around? That the Peavey Block Letter got laughed out of town by the SLO30W. I stopped thinking or believing in these sort of guitar forum stories long ago.
What can any rational person consulting guitar amplification conclude with that other than, okay, great, enjoy it, but why should that matter to me or anyone else? It's your own personal anecdotal story or experience. It has absolutely no bearing at all on the claim only 100W high-gain amps are gig-worthy or have a signature tone for anyone else.
To some here, even the engineers who produce sub-100W amps to do this job are just lying to everybody when they say their sub 100W amp has the same signature tone or is gig-ready as long as your not competing with a 100W amp of the same model. Are people are able to beat blind tests when it comes down to crunch? No. I haven't seen any serious amp designers or serious guitarists make the claim they can tell the difference either. They say things like, "man, don't the lines just blur."
I say like them, Yeah, they do.
Last edited: