MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Picasso
  • Start date Start date
Communism vs. Capitalism.
I see it as team sport politics scrambling people's brains. Unfortunately it goes both ways. Now "freedom lovers" making excuses for WEF billionaire schemes, banning apps, censoring speech and so on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo
That's a hybrid. Hybrid tech is actually pretty cool IMO. I mean EV's are cool too if you're ok with a glorified golf cart.
My opinion is Hybrid is the better way to go over full electric. At least you don't have to worry about running out of battery and being stranded on the side the road. It just switches to gas. Plus all the ways they made use of Faraday's Law to charge the battery while you were driving on gas. It is definitely a technology that was abandoned too quickly.
 
I see it as team sport politics scrambling people's brains. Unfortunately it goes both ways. Now "freedom lovers" making excuses for WEF billionaire schemes, banning apps, censoring speech and so on.
PhoneyBaloney has no idea she supports communism. Probably doesn't have the brain power to understand.
 
1000012047.jpg
 
My opinion is Hybrid is the better way to go over full electric. At least you don't have to worry about running out of battery and being stranded on the side the road. It just switches to gas. Plus all the ways they made use of Faraday's Law to charge the battery while you were driving on gas. It is definitely a technology that was abandoned too quickly.
Why abandoned? There are tons of hybrids available.
 
Why abandoned? There are tons of hybrids available.
There's hybrids on the market, but not near as much money is being put to R&D for them. At least for now more has been put towards developing full electric lines. Maybe as some point when companies realize full EV isn't as far along as it need to be to be viable they'll put more back into developing hybrids further.
 
Lol, post your rebuttal then
Should be pretty obvious to anyone who took a high school biology class, but very well I'll humor you. I'll give the short version...

During conception the embryo inherits either XX or XY chromosomes which at that moment determines the biological sex; female or male respectively. At 6-8 weeks of gestation the Y chromosome signals the production of testosterones which in turns triggers development of gonads.

So biological sex is determined at conception, not 8 weeks later when male sex organs begin to develop. And furthermore an embryo doesn't start off female and turn male. It's a blank slate that can go either way. Without being triggered to develop male sex organs, at roughly 11 weeks development defaults to female.
 
Isn't that problematic for the executive order?
Not really, the embryo already has either XX or XY chromosomes at conception so biological sex is already determined. The rest is developing the sex organs. Think of blank slate as you would a stem cell. It is able to develop into the role it is assigned. The embryo doesn't start off with ovaries and
fallopian tubes which transform into gonads and epididymis.
 
I'm just trying to figure out this person's obsession with something that doesn't directly affect them.
She's just trolling.

She is also posting that Trump is responsible for high food prices even though he has only been in office for a week.
 
Back
Top