Nico
Active member
rokker":thcvlcod said:Hey Nico,
Having owned a Marsha (Rupe owes me for trading it to him during a personal crisis) and having played Seitz333's PT 100 I will say the Marsha's clean is not as clear.
I think originally Dave F. stated the Marsha is essentially a one channel amp. I think that's mostly true as it really isn't a channel switcher like the PT. You can get three very different tones on a PT so it's incredibly more flexable. HOWEVER, for "one smoking channel" the Marsha can't be beaten.
Yeah I knew about the versatility issue. I ordered mine with a simple clean.
I already have an Ecstasy which I think is pretty flexible and has a good clean channel and the blue channel which is sex! Honestly I don't play so much with cleans so its not so much a big a deal for me. I wanted a high gain organic tone that stayed tight and was less compressed. I opted for the Marsha.
I couldn't resist the true Marshall tone of the Friedman. The PT-100 has its own sound going but I don't find it a true hot rodded Marshall sound, which is what I like! It still sounds great!