L
lessarti
Well-known member
So I have had my MC II for about 4 years now approx, and I have to admit I normally play straight in. I decided to give it a go and truly unbiased expectations give some good experimentation. I found level at 3' o clock to full on, 0 dist, tone at 11 o clock was great. It tightened the low end slightly enough to make it similar to the mtl as far as a little bit of compression.
VERY impressed with the results, I even decided to see how the lead channel sounded without lead boost engaged but sd1 ON. Great high gain rhythm sound, then engage lead boost on the amp with sd 1 on for lead sound. It really puts the MC II into the MTL territory as far as compression tight tracking vs dynamic tight tracking.
In conclusion, I took my monkey mind out of the equation, as I always try to say the amps own sound is good enough without boosts, and just engaged myself in pure exploring of sounds looking for something that was nice and not overbearing. Great amp and takes boosts extremely well.
VERY impressed with the results, I even decided to see how the lead channel sounded without lead boost engaged but sd1 ON. Great high gain rhythm sound, then engage lead boost on the amp with sd 1 on for lead sound. It really puts the MC II into the MTL territory as far as compression tight tracking vs dynamic tight tracking.
In conclusion, I took my monkey mind out of the equation, as I always try to say the amps own sound is good enough without boosts, and just engaged myself in pure exploring of sounds looking for something that was nice and not overbearing. Great amp and takes boosts extremely well.