Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifier vs. Mark V vs. Bogner Twin Jet

  • Thread starter Thread starter leib10
  • Start date Start date
leib10

leib10

Well-known member
Went to the local GC today, they had a bunch of Mesa stuff there, including a Mark V, a Dual Rec, and a bunch of cabs. So I went all the way home and grabbed my Twin Jet to do a quick comparison. All amps were played through a Mesa Rectifier cab, and I was using my white Schecter C1-FR Custom with SD SH-8 Invaders.

I'll start with the Dual Rec. I really wasn't impressed. The sound was really thin, the clean channel was kind of bland, and I can tell that you need to really, REALLY crank it for the gain channels to sound good. Kinda flubby too. Maybe I'm just used to the huge saturation of the Bogners, but it really wasn't my thing. I stopped playing after five minutes.

The Mesa Mark V is a different story. It reminds me of the Twin Jet when it's with the KT88's- really aggressive and tight, if somewhat dry and thin (in comparison to the Twin Jet). It really doesn't need a boost at all and is a really easy amp to play and dial in (only considering the knobs). Tons of features, to the point that it's kinda too many for my tastes. You'd spend weeks trying to understand all the switches, knobs, and sliders and their functions. That being said, if I owned it and took the time to learn about it I'm sure that the added versatility would grow on me. It paired really well with the Rectifier cab. It's pretty expensive- about $2000 new- but it's a LOT of amp for the price. You get three channels, lots of options between them, and they all sound really great, even the clean and crunch channels. All of them sound really nice at bedroom levels, which is an important thing for me. It's also a good deal smaller than either the Dual Rec or the Twin Jet.

The Twin Jet was last. I had it loaded with EL34's today. I immediately noticed how the saturation was so much more apparent in comparison. The distortion is really, really thick, and it had this low-mid growl that I couldn't even approach with the Mesas. It was a bit flubbier than the Mark V, but boosting it with my TS-9 took care of that and was probably because I had the EL34's in. I really liked it paired to the Rectifier cab; I bet on some days I'd actually prefer it to the Uberkab, probably due to it being loaded with all V30s and thus having a bit more aggression and bite to it. The Twin Jet was also a bit more articulate than the Mesas, as well as having less background hum despite having a lot more distortion on tap. I should say that this thing has more gain available than the Mark V and certainly the Dual Rec; I was at 2:30 on the TJ and maxed out on the Mark V and they were at similar levels. Channel One on the Twin Jet is what I would use for live applications, as it cuts a lot better than Channel Two, which is what I would record with. Both channels sound surprisingly good at low levels, but I should say that it's hard to get a nice clean sound at higher levels on Channel One. Semi-clean is as good as it gets at that level, and I would see it being a problem to switch between clean and distorted tones in a live situation. It's also the most expensive by far at $2800 new, but they can be had at around $1800 used (like mine). Lastly, it's a bitch to move around.

Overall, I would rank them in this order if I was to get them:

1. Mesa Mark V
2. Bogner Uberschall Twin Jet
3. Mesa Dual Rectifier

The Mark V won out because it's smaller, a lot more versatile, would be pretty easy to use live, and has a dedicated clean channel and a very good high-gain channel. However, for really thick and aggressive distortion, the Twin Jet is still king. There's that distinctive low-mid growl and huge low-end that Uberschalls are famous for, and if that's your thing (like it is mine), there's no replicating that. I was really disappointed with the Dual Rectifier, especially considering how popular they are. Maybe I'm used to more saturated and compressed gain, but it really wasn't my thing, especially if I have to crank it to sound good (NOT happening in an apartment!). I really loved the Rectifier cab too, especially with the Twin Jet.

EDIT: After throwing the KT88's back in, I decided to amend these conclusions. If you need a dedicated clean channel, go with the Mark V. If you only need semi-clean all the way up to ridiculous gain, go with the Twin Jet.
 
Mesa Mark V FTW :rock:

I've traded/sold mine a few times and have regretted it each time. Not making the mistake again though.
 
leib10":1ea9uzfj said:
I was really disappointed with the Dual Rectifier, especially considering how popular they are. Maybe I'm used to more saturated and compressed gain, but it really wasn't my thing, especially if I have to crank it to sound good (NOT happening in an apartment!). I really loved the Rectifier cab too, especially with the Twin Jet.

I don't find Rectifiers to have a really saturated gain sound. It's not really their bag. They really reward having a heavy yet dynamic pick attack and between that and the sag they can sound really off if you're not used to them. I have both a Recto and Mark V and I find the Mark V is way easier to play in comparison.
 
I did too. The Mark V is one of the few high-end tube amps I've played that really don't need a boost. The Dual Rec reminded me of a weak version of my old Rev Blue Uberschall. I'm a light picker, so maybe the Dual Rec won't work for me in the first place.

EDIT: Well, maybe weak isn't the right word. I can't describe it... it just lacks that in-your-face sound that I've come to appreciate. Not my thing.
 
Never played a Mark V or Uberschall. Was very interested in them both with just listening to recordings though. Never cared for the dual recto. I do like the single though for some reason. I didn't for awhile. Then I did something probably pretty stupid and threw in KT88s. Nothing bad has happened yet and I've had them in there for a long time... Unfortunately, there are not a lot of places to play good gear around here. Just have to buy and hope. I haven't really been disappointed yet. Hope that streak continues.
 
leib10":1daztczu said:
EDIT: Well, maybe weak isn't the right word. I can't describe it... it just lacks that in-your-face sound that I've come to appreciate. Not my thing.

Upper midrange? :lol: :LOL:
 
Maybe so. That and being pretty thin. But the Mark V has a bit of an emphasis on the upper mids, and it didn't nearly as thin. Probably the most overrated piece of gear I've played in recent memory, even if it was for all of five minutes.
 
leib10":29un7w3u said:
Maybe so. That and being pretty thin. But the Mark V has a bit of an emphasis on the upper mids, and it didn't nearly as thin. Probably the most overrated piece of gear I've played in recent memory, even if it was for all of five minutes.

I wonder if there was something wrong with that Recto? Normally a Mark is naturally thinner (or more focused) sounding than a Recto... the proverbial scalpel next to the sledgehammer. I can understand people not liking it for a lot of the things they dislike them for... but being too thin usually isn't one of them.
 
Maybe so, who knows. I played a Triple Rec a while back and wasn't impressed with that either. Maybe it's just the Rectifier series with me...

EDIT: I threw the KT88's back in to the Twin Jet this morning and I noticed that the amp was way tighter than with the EL34's (makes sense). I'd say it's still a bit more bass-heavy than the Mark V, but just as tight. IIRC the Mark V it had 6L6's installed. So I'd say they're equals when it comes to tightness, with the Twin Jet being just a tad more articulate.

I'd like to amend my rankings up above. It all depends on what you're using the amp for. If you need a dedicated clean channel, go with the Mark V. If you're only going to play semi-dirty and up, go with the Twin Jet.
 
leib10":3m4aqrvf said:
Maybe so, who knows. I played a Triple Rec a while back and wasn't impressed with that either. Maybe it's just the Rectifier series with me...

Could be. If everyone liked the same shit the world would be boring.
 
some dude":2f0duqzf said:
leib10":2f0duqzf said:
Maybe so. That and being pretty thin. But the Mark V has a bit of an emphasis on the upper mids, and it didn't nearly as thin. Probably the most overrated piece of gear I've played in recent memory, even if it was for all of five minutes.

I wonder if there was something wrong with that Recto? Normally a Mark is naturally thinner (or more focused) sounding than a Recto... the proverbial scalpel next to the sledgehammer. I can understand people not liking it for a lot of the things they dislike them for... but being too thin usually isn't one of them.
I agree. I have a Mark III and a Triple Recto. the Recto always sounds more massive and saturated than the Mark. The Mark is mainly good for leads and thrash.
 
Rectos take more than 5 minutes to dial in if you're not used to playing them, IMO.
 
Probably so, I just didn't have time to mess with it or the venue to really crank it.
 
Shask":2nrg7irj said:
some dude":2nrg7irj said:
leib10":2nrg7irj said:
Maybe so. That and being pretty thin. But the Mark V has a bit of an emphasis on the upper mids, and it didn't nearly as thin. Probably the most overrated piece of gear I've played in recent memory, even if it was for all of five minutes.

I wonder if there was something wrong with that Recto? Normally a Mark is naturally thinner (or more focused) sounding than a Recto... the proverbial scalpel next to the sledgehammer. I can understand people not liking it for a lot of the things they dislike them for... but being too thin usually isn't one of them.
I agree. I have a Mark III and a Triple Recto. the Recto always sounds more massive and saturated than the Mark. The Mark is mainly good for leads and thrash.

I have a Triple Recto as well. Thin is NOT the word I would ever use to describe it. It's thick and massive. It does take time to find the tones though. :thumbsup:
 
Anybody who can read English can have the mark v dials and switches figured out in minutes, they are all clearly labeled. :rock:
 
True true. But I'm also considering that for plug and play, it's really not advantageous to have so many switches, knobs, sliders, etc. I prefer the simplicity of my Twin Jet, if you can call its EQ controls "simple". :)
 
Dr. Swamp":2p96ks8d said:
Rectos take more than 5 minutes to dial in if you're not used to playing them, IMO.

Agree with this. The thing about Rectos also is that unboosted you have to dial them for a fat and dark sound because straight in that's where they sound best. If you don't like this amp tone, then you will naturally dial it for a tighter and brighter amp sound, but unboosted Rectos sound like complete ass when you dial them like that. In order to get that tighter and brighter sound from a Recto (and really my favorite sound from them) is to run an 808 or similar EQing boost before it, and then dial it around that. Even with a slew of boosts, Rectos are very very hard amps to dial in. You almost need an engineering degree just to appreciate all of the different switch and knob functionalities on the front and back, and what they are doing for your sound.
 
Epic":1298zl3h said:
Anybody who can read English can have the mark v dials and switches figured out in minutes, they are all clearly labeled. :rock:
I agree-they are easy to read and find but there is a lot to it. It dials in a similar manner as the other marks but not quite. I found the EQ needed a bit of tweaking and similar to the other makes the sliders were very sensitive. It also helps knowing how to dial in Mesa amps in general. Presence/Treble don't do exactly what you'd think they would and the bass is very touchy and can get boxy in a hurry. On top of that-getting the output and master at a good level together takes some time too. Overall, I wouldn't argue that it is difficult to dial in but it takes some time fiddling to get it perfect.

Also-you can get lost. There are A LOT of options to have fun with :thumbsup:
 
I suppose I just can't relate....my first Mesa was a road king ii, my second was the mark v. Neither were hard to dial in or understand, but maybe thats because I read the manuals, I dunno. I had never played an earlier mark before buying my mark v, so the fact that they dial in differently wasn't an issue for me, nothing to "relearn" so to speak.
 
JakeAC5253":1db2ut3y said:
Dr. Swamp":1db2ut3y said:
Rectos take more than 5 minutes to dial in if you're not used to playing them, IMO.

Agree with this. The thing about Rectos also is that unboosted you have to dial them for a fat and dark sound because straight in that's where they sound best. If you don't like this amp tone, then you will naturally dial it for a tighter and brighter amp sound, but unboosted Rectos sound like complete ass when you dial them like that. In order to get that tighter and brighter sound from a Recto (and really my favorite sound from them) is to run an 808 or similar EQing boost before it, and then dial it around that. Even with a slew of boosts, Rectos are very very hard amps to dial in. You almost need an engineering degree just to appreciate all of the different switch and knob functionalities on the front and back, and what they are doing for your sound.

this man speaks the truth. Also the Recto's kill in a band mix and amp tones that kill in a band mix don't always wow you by yourself in a room.
 
Back
Top