
Techdeth
RESIDENT ROCK PROFESSOR
I just got my student one . Ran it through greenbacks . Sounded greatYeah I need to get a triple x before they go up. Those are one of the last steals left on the used market
I just got my student one . Ran it through greenbacks . Sounded greatYeah I need to get a triple x before they go up. Those are one of the last steals left on the used market
That's a good point, and I probably wouldn't have believed you just a few years ago, but recently I nabbed a Rev F recto and played it side by side with my Rev G and 3ch. I know, totally different Mesas, but while they can all do the same "type" of sound, probably modded could be identical, it's true that there's something about the Rev F that I only feel while playing, even if I could never pick it out in a blind test if it was dialed to sound the same as the others. Someone else was telling me about some kind of phantom capacitance or... something... forgot how it was worded exactly, I'll need to dig through my emails. But long story short, something about the boards and parts used as a sum makes an amp feel different, so even if you recreated the exact circuit but used different manufacturing materials (ex. a different type of silicon for the PCB), it wouldn't be the same. I haven't verified any of this, might just be all smoke and mirrors, but sounds like the same kind of thing here.What you’re missing is the experience playing one vs the other. They are way different in the feel
That's a good point, and I probably wouldn't have believed you just a few years ago, but recently I nabbed a Rev F recto and played it side by side with my Rev G and 3ch. I know, totally different Mesas, but while they can all do the same "type" of sound, probably modded could be identical, it's true that there's something about the Rev F that I only feel while playing, even if I could never pick it out in a blind test if it was dialed to sound the same as the others. Someone else was telling me about some kind of phantom capacitance or... something... forgot how it was worded exactly, I'll need to dig through my emails. But long story short, something about the boards and parts used as a sum makes an amp feel different, so even if you recreated the exact circuit but used different manufacturing materials (ex. a different type of silicon for the PCB), it wouldn't be the same. I haven't verified any of this, might just be all smoke and mirrors, but sounds like the same kind of thing here.
Just as an FYI- I happen to have a c+ and VII at the moment. I don’t deserve either amp but here we are lol.I paid market for my mark III++ Coli converted to full pentode, but this amp fucks hard and was $1500 cheaper than one listed on reverb. It makes IIC+ recordings online seem weak. I honestly don’t see the benefits of paying more than I did for a IIC+ because I don’t see the tonal benefit. I’d much prefer the versatility of a VII as they can nail IIC+ and more
so this amp fucks hard?I paid market for my mark III++ Coli converted to full pentode, but this amp fucks hard and was $1500 cheaper than one listed on reverb. It makes IIC+ recordings online seem weak. I honestly don’t see the benefits of paying more than I did for a IIC+ because I don’t see the tonal benefit. I’d much prefer the versatility of a VII as they can nail IIC+ and more
so this amp fucks hard?
Have you used the VII in a band context? I'm wondering if they work well in a live situation? as we know the IIC+ is hard to make cut through at times. You gotta use your 750hz slider quite a bit.Just as an FYI- I happen to have a c+ and VII at the moment. I don’t deserve either amp but here we are lol.
The 7 really doesn’t “nail” the c+ sound or feel if I’m being nitpicky which we all are. But that’s not a bad thing. It has its own sound and feel and each amp makes me play differently. I can get them to sound pretty similar but when you’re the one playing, you realize they are different amps with their own thing happening.
The VII is really aggressive and modern and really pushes me to play faster, aggressive more “metal” type stuff. It’s angry. There is a lot of high end available in the amp - lately I’ve been bringing down the treble on the GEQ. There’s some depth in the low end that the c+ doesn’t have. The feel is tighter than the c+ but not wizard immediate so it’s still fun to play.
The C+ is more liquid, fluffy if you will. This particular one is really more of a rock/hard rock amp IMO. It’s thick and articulate at the same time- almost feels like two guitar tracks happening simultaneously. There’s more give vs the tighter Mark 7. It’s less “I’m fucking angry” and more “I’ve been doing some soul searching lately”. Just kill me for saying that
Whichever one my ears get used to, I tend to prefer.
I haven't tried the VII or a 3 but I think I would probably go for a VII or JP2C over a 3k mark III unless you are a collector. They have went up ridiculously over the past couple years but to me 3k is a lot of coin to spend on something you will likely only use one channel of(with an amp that old).
I could be completely wrong but I've heard some really great demos of the VII and it seems like a pretty solid amp. Although haven't heard much good about the VII channel.
What's your favorite amp to play live for those type of tones?IMO the MkIII is by far the best Mark for thrash and it's not even close. While all of them are raw, the red/blue/green especially thrash hard as they are even more aggressive. For decades the III (and IIB for other reasons) has been underrated, I suspect prices are only going up from here.
After playing the VII in the live (metal/thrash) band, I wouldn't fuck it with someone else's dick. Possibly the worst live mix amp I've ever had, the notes were completely inaudible by every guy in the band. Pure mush.
A Mark III+, for sure. From the hoards of Mesas I've had, the top two for what I want to do are my loop modded IIB Coli and my blue stripe III+ "coli". (It's really a 60, but I'm slaving it into a M180 which is a IIC+ Coli power section in a rack.) This particular III+ is fairly new to me but it's blowing doors at rehearsal. Can't wait to gig it and find out who the winner is.What's your favorite amp to play live for those type of tones?
IMO the MkIII is by far the best Mark for thrash and it's not even close. While all of them are raw, the red/blue/green especially thrash hard as they are even more aggressive. For decades the III (and IIB for other reasons) has been underrated, I suspect prices are only going up from here.
After playing the VII in the live (metal/thrash) band, I wouldn't fuck it with someone else's dick. Possibly the worst live mix amp I've ever had, the notes were completely inaudible by every guy in the band. Pure mush.
Of course, I spent most of a 3 hour rehearsal trying all the modes & settings hoping to find something that works. Never did. Closest it came was C+ mode with abnormally low gain. To be fair before this I actually liked the amp a lot, but to me how an amp works in the live mix is king and that's where my amps go to live or die.That’s insane it doesn’t fit in a pocket within the mix. Did you experiment with sliders or EQ to find out where in the spectrum it was lacking at least? Was it just too much gain? I know I’ve been hesitant to go down the Herbert hole because of their awful live attitude even though they make great studio amps.
This I agree withIMO the MkIII is by far the best Mark for thrash and it's not even close. While all of them are raw, the red/blue/green especially thrash hard as they are even more aggressive. For decades the III (and IIB for other reasons) has been underrated, I suspect prices are only going up from here.
After playing the VII in the live (metal/thrash) band, I wouldn't fuck it with someone else's dick. Possibly the worst live mix amp I've ever had, the notes were completely inaudible by every guy in the band. Pure mush.
Well, a traditional boost doesn't help. You can hear it here. In the live band it actually made it worse, and I like boosting Marks!I hear what you mean and what you’re pointing out now. Does a treble booster into the amp fix it? It has to be fixed pre preamp and not post since it looks like they’re cutting massive amounts of top end for stability. Adding it after won’t work spectrally since there’s an aggressive low pass filter going on. Makes me think I want to get one just to mod it to fix that glaring problem
For 80's thrash you might be right, they got that nasty aggression to them. I still prefer the IIC+ and IV though for anything 90's and up.IMO the MkIII is by far the best Mark for thrash and it's not even close. While all of them are raw, the red/blue/green especially thrash hard as they are even more aggressive. For decades the III (and IIB for other reasons) has been underrated, I suspect prices are only going up from here.
After playing the VII in the live (metal/thrash) band, I wouldn't fuck it with someone else's dick. Possibly the worst live mix amp I've ever had, the notes were completely inaudible by every guy in the band. Pure mush.