RACKSYSTEMS":x1lft6wo said:
Just to clarify. BE amps with the new board I consider better. Much lower noise floor. Anything can lead you to believing one amp is better then the next. Unless you do a blind test with a amp switcher and the amps have the same tubes etc. you can't really say. Most people I have found like the new lower noise one better. Buy no means am I saying the olds ones are not good, they sound the same. Just new ones have a lower noise floor.
Ah fuck, you know. All the versions of these super expensive amps piss me off.
It all started when I got a CAA OD100 SE.
Then I had to have the SE+ (and yes, it was better).
Then came the PT-100 which I thought was better than the SE+ but after awhile I wasn't so sure.
Thank god Cameron went haywire, my CCV seems to still be the monster that it always was and since no more seem imminent, I MAY just have the right version of that amp!!!
Of course, then along comes the BE100. I ignored that one for awhile. Then that damn Rappaport dude

starts with the youtube vids. I had become immune to Mark Day...he screwed me on the CAA amps

. After the Rappaport shit, well then, I had to have the damn BE100. I hunted down what I thought was the current version of the BE. Wow, holy jumpin' Jesus Christ what a great amp!! But...no...damn another version comes out with not 5 but 4 preamps tubes and a better "noise floor."

Here we go again!!!
Meanwhile, my 2000 Triple Rec and whatever the fuck year JVM 410 continue to kick ass. Not as much ass kicking as my BE or CCV, but ass kickery nonetheless.
Anyway, what's the point of all this bullshit? I don't know...stop with telling everyone about the damn revisions with these expensive amps!!
And now I want a JJ100!!