The JB was actually designed around a 250k pot and I personally prefer it with thr 250k. The 59 however sounds like ass with a 250k pot IMHO.
With that said, its cool that you were able to get a tone that you like just by changing the pots!!
Oh yeah, please tell me that you aced that fugly knob that it comes with
I don't mean to hijack, but does anyone know what pots Les Pauls (from the 2000's) come with? I have a JB and a 59 in my LP and I can't check my guitar at the moment.
I don't mean to hijack, but does anyone know what pots Les Pauls (from the 2000's) come with? I have a JB and a 59 in my LP and I can't check my guitar at the moment.
I don't mean to hijack, but does anyone know what pots Les Pauls (from the 2000's) come with? I have a JB and a 59 in my LP and I can't check my guitar at the moment.
I don't mean to hijack, but does anyone know what pots Les Pauls (from the 2000's) come with? I have a JB and a 59 in my LP and I can't check my guitar at the moment.
They SHOULD be 500K long shafts, but are more than likely 300Ks. That's why many Les Paul lovers are buying these kits with the 'correct' wiring and pots in them. It's like taking a blanket off your guitar.
So they *are* putting 250Ks in the Charvels - I wondered about that, since (as has been mentioned) that was the "original" spec. (As much as anything was back then...)