
j666
New member
as far as looks go...i don't like any of their headstocks...or their guitars for that matter.
well, if looks aren't a factor, then how come every b.c. rich, moser, rico jr., uberpointy pointy gets dissed here? that's like saying you're not vain while you look in the mirror. everybody cares what a guitar looks like to some degree. maybe not so much if you don't play out (no offense cuz i'm pretty sure you don't) which would be a factor but still...it prolly wouldn't be your fave.Digital Jams":xdqfhdzn said:crwnedblasphemy":xdqfhdzn said:if they stick with that, sales will drop at least 15%.
That 15% must not dig the guitar then if a headstock changes their buying habits![]()
guitarslinger":yl0ufrkb said:It's not the "new" Suhr headstock.
It's the Landau headstock.
Nothing is changing on the standard and customs.
Stop being stupid.![]()
![]()
![]()
Telephant":31rd2qq3 said:The Tyler headstocks grew on me. Too bad the necks are massive!Chubtone":31rd2qq3 said:I'm a Suhr fan but THAT is the butt ugliest headstock I have ever seen and I would not own a guitar with that headstock , period. Did they need a new headstock? Was Gibson going after them for violating a Kramer trademark or something?
I like Tyler headstocks. I like the old Suhr headstock. I'm fairly reasonable about headstocks, but this new Suhr one, the Caparison one, the newer Wayne elf shoe headstock, and the 2 new GMW's just suck, plain and simple.![]()
I love the Vigier headstock though. It looks very "natural," if you know what I mean.