
Little B
Well-known member
I was just workin a deal on the 1rst version at a local store..maybe i need to rethink and wait and see what the price is gonna be just for the new head..
Bamboo":13bufjb0 said:Hi Pete - any idea if just the cab will be offered at some point?
Still looking forward to that under 50-watt head you guys were/are working on.
lester":1ftkyffy said:
Sits so killer in the mix. Sounds great...good job guys!
50MkII":6hdd9bog said:Hi Pete,
I played a PT-100 back in 2011. Can you compare it to the third and second channel of that amp for us? While I liked the PT-100 I just could not find myself able to dial out the overall brightness/highs in that amp. Also, did not have a real need for the thump knob (or whatever it was called) and found the third channel too modern in tone. Is there a SL67 in the works or was that meant to be SL68?
Thank you!
50MkII":3mjazsz4 said:Hi Pete,
I played a PT-100 back in 2011. Can you compare it to the third and second channel of that amp for us? While I liked the PT-100 I just could not find myself able to dial out the overall brightness/highs in that amp. Also, did not have a real need for the thump knob (or whatever it was called) and found the third channel too modern in tone. Is there a SL67 in the works or was that meant to be SL68?
Thank you!
petethorn":1xt364lo said:50MkII":1xt364lo said:Hi Pete,
I played a PT-100 back in 2011. Can you compare it to the third and second channel of that amp for us? While I liked the PT-100 I just could not find myself able to dial out the overall brightness/highs in that amp. Also, did not have a real need for the thump knob (or whatever it was called) and found the third channel too modern in tone. Is there a SL67 in the works or was that meant to be SL68?
Thank you!
Hiya, long story short- everything you mention has been addressed. There's been a bunch of mods to ch2/3-we dialed in ch2/3 to sound like the Marshall of your dreams, with enough range on the tone controls (especially the treble) to match up with any good quality speakers/cab. With just a tweak of the bright switch and treble on ch2/3- greenbacks. V30's, M75's, etc etc or our choice, the Creamback H75... They all sound great.
Whomp has been replaced by a 3 position depth switch. The middle position is what I use, and you have the option of a bit more or less, all 3 are great useable tones.
The new boost is leaner and "sweeter" sounding, making the boosted ch2/3 sound like a killer gainy modded Marshall. Nothing wrong with the old tube boost but it had a lot of low end, making things more "modern". Lower filtering and the new output transformer all keep things in the Plexi realm, which is the tone I feel is my home base, the one that I always come back to.
I really want people to put this amp next to the best competitors out there and let em go head to head. I think it's the very best American clean/British drive amp available.
Hollis":2kyr9qbk said:On a side note, I've been listening to Pete Thorn's album "Guitar Nerd" and it f'n slays! Good work man! Were you using a PT-100, SL68, or a bunch of amps? If these folks here listen to the album I bet you'd sell tons of these amps lol!
lespaul6":39g5s0ko said:the excessive bass needed to be addressed in all the suhr circuits...se, pt, od etc If it had only the amount of bass a stock marshall had and everything else the same, it would be much more to my liking. This is where the friedman circuit got it right..
AndyK":v4xgcwdx said:Pete - I just watched your demo of the SL68 from 2011 - sounded amazing - and very similar to the newer version of the PT100! When you get to demoing the new signature amp, please play Perplexed like you did on the SL68 demo!
petethorn":1siprzkh said:Ok, will do. You can get real close to the SL68 with this amp, I mean like splitting hairs close.