Floyd Eye
Well-known member
So there hasn’t been a drive by in any of the Burroughs where 3 or more bangers were shot ? That’s bullshit. You’re safer in NYC than you are St. Louis or Chicago. But that ain’t saying much.
JTyson
Well-known member
They said the guy had well documented mental problems so he had to have lied on the background check when that (not an M4) AR was purchased.
We’ve had this conversation before, I still would not mind the background check system being linked to mental health records to prevent a mentally ill nut get his hands on a weapon. They will lie about that shit with no hesitation. Link the system so a flag comes up for a documented mentally ill person, the purchase goes to an extended review process that takes more time, a much more stringent review takes place, including looking at social media posts and juvenile records and if the guy lied on the form he goes straight to jail.
Would only stop them from getting legal weapons, but it would be a decent way to shut up all the morons who cry about “legally purchased weapons” when they have no idea wtf they are talking about..
Or just don’t sell guns to democrats
We’ve had this conversation before, I still would not mind the background check system being linked to mental health records to prevent a mentally ill nut get his hands on a weapon. They will lie about that shit with no hesitation. Link the system so a flag comes up for a documented mentally ill person, the purchase goes to an extended review process that takes more time, a much more stringent review takes place, including looking at social media posts and juvenile records and if the guy lied on the form he goes straight to jail.
Would only stop them from getting legal weapons, but it would be a decent way to shut up all the morons who cry about “legally purchased weapons” when they have no idea wtf they are talking about..
Or just don’t sell guns to democrats
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
Years ago, they used to lock crazy people away from guns and the public. It worked pretty well as evidenced by the low amount of shootings at that time.
Now they just give crazy people medication, which works until they lose their job or lose insurance.
Some states have "red flag" laws which i do not agree with at all.
The sentiment itself isn't bad, but the potential for misuse/abuse is too high imho.
Break up with your girlfriend? She calls the cops and your firearms get taken away.
Hell, we had a member here threaten to swat another member over mean internet words.
We need to admit that this problem is caused by mental illness and DO SOMETHING about it. But it's easier to just wrongly blame guns for the problem.
Now they just give crazy people medication, which works until they lose their job or lose insurance.
Some states have "red flag" laws which i do not agree with at all.
The sentiment itself isn't bad, but the potential for misuse/abuse is too high imho.
Break up with your girlfriend? She calls the cops and your firearms get taken away.
Hell, we had a member here threaten to swat another member over mean internet words.
We need to admit that this problem is caused by mental illness and DO SOMETHING about it. But it's easier to just wrongly blame guns for the problem.
P
psychodave
Well-known member
This tragedy could have easily been stopped had citizens been able to carry guns. Seems the MSM avoided the recent Walmart stabber being stopped by a good guy with a gun. It's even more impressive that the media ignored the story since the good guy with the gun was black.
G
Geo
Well-known member
So we now know the car he drove, the brand and model of the gun, what bullets he used but we don't know what psych drugs he was on or the name of the doctor that gave them to him.
See how that works?
See how that works?
84superchamp
Well-known member
Red Flag Laws would work if they were used properly, but they won't be. Hundreds (thousands?) of innocents would be swept up in the misuse and abuse.
70 Mach 1
Well-known member
To bad the prick offed himself.
Alvin Brag would have just let him go with an appearance ticket. Then waited around until he showed for the court date.
Alvin Brag would have just let him go with an appearance ticket. Then waited around until he showed for the court date.
Last edited:
R
Robostyle
Well-known member
Was the weapon obtained legally? Sorry i didn't see it
Wizard of Ozz
Well-known member
Yep. Shooter was a security guard in NV. Had a CWP as well.
Some much for more gun laws.
311boogieman
Well-known member
Yes
They said the guy had well documented mental problems so he had to have lied on the background check when that (not an M4) AR was purchased.
We’ve had this conversation before, I still would not mind the background check system being linked to mental health records to prevent a mentally ill nut get his hands on a weapon. They will lie about that shit with no hesitation. Link the system so a flag comes up for a documented mentally ill person, the purchase goes to an extended review process that takes more time, a much more stringent review takes place, including looking at social media posts and juvenile records and if the guy lied on the form he goes straight to jail.
Would only stop them from getting legal weapons, but it would be a decent way to shut up all the morons who cry about “legally purchased weapons” when they have no idea wtf they are talking about..
Or just don’t sell guns to democrats
Agreed. I have no problem with background checks or even waiting a week for a gun. If you had something to hide and needed a gun ASAP - that should be a red flag. Not to confuse with the Red Flag laws in some states, which overstep their bounds.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Waiting periods only apply to the law abiding.
Most gun owners have more than one gun. If they needed a gun to use right now, they already have it. Waiting periods and all the other bullshit laws that only apply to the law abiding are unconstitutional.
Most gun owners have more than one gun. If they needed a gun to use right now, they already have it. Waiting periods and all the other bullshit laws that only apply to the law abiding are unconstitutional.
Wizard of Ozz
Well-known member
Cuck's News Network
Corey James
Well-known member
Agreed,
Hell, Democrats would create a database and just start reporting literally everyone who isn't on a soapbox preaching about gays for palenstine.
Soros might even pay $20 a head with USAID money for a purple haired loon to fill out the paperwork (on behalf of the children, of course)
84superchamp
Well-known member
I whole-heartedly agree. My application for a CCW in indiana was a huge disappointment: apply at local sheriff dept, get fingerprinted, fill out questionnaire and send it in. The reply from state police was vague and negative but my app was declined. They also stated i could contest their "ruling" if i showed up within a week in person in Indianapolis, 2 1/2 hours away. Mid winter with travel advisories and my only ride at the time was my old 2wd wood truck. I just wrote it off as a loss with no good explanation....but no law against carrying the glock in my truck: "I'm coming back from the range".
For a republican controlled state, Indiana is behind on it's gun laws.
84superchamp
Well-known member
That way he could show up at the courthouse, kill a few more people before he offed himself.
G
Geo
Well-known member
Notice how the mental illness shootings get memory holed right away?
G
Geo
Well-known member
Big pharma is probably 90% of network income.
Reverend Bow
Active member
Got your Tin Foil Hat ready?
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
And now it's moot. Since July 1 2022 Indiana has had Constitutional Carry making it no longer necessary to get a permission slip from your state government to exercise your inalienable rights to keep and bear arms.