OK, what's next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave M
  • Start date Start date
Aynirar27 said:
So now the spectrum of light is made up?
Click to expand...
A graphic artist added the colors so yeah, it's an interpretation of what you'd see. And again, it's not even a single photograph, but a composite of several photographs which also tells me they aren't going very far into "space" because they cannot get the whole "globe" in a single photo.
 
Aynirar27 said:
aw cmon man.
well what do you mean by fake I guess. Like totally computer generated? For the most part the colors are completely fake yes. The images are taken in infared so we wouldn't be able to see them without us adding colors to them
Click to expand...
Radio and infrared telescopes are rendered images….telescopic images are actual photos. Key word in the first sentence is RENDERED…c’mon man….
 
VonBonfire said:
If it's a composite you take it on faith that they arranged it accurately. But you already told me they added the colors.

Why didn't they just go further into "space" and take a single photo? The logical conclusion is they can't go that high.
Click to expand...
You are mixing up posts
 
We need Eddie Bravo to join this thread.

raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg
 
VonBonfire said:
No, I just responded to both your posts.

"We went to the moon" "We have a space station"

Then why the need for a composite photograph?

Because it's all bs.They can't fly that high!
Click to expand...
The deep space photos have the colors added because they aren’t taken on a visible light spectrum. Not the pictures of earth
 
VonBonfire said:
Oh they added colors to make it more interesting. How cute.

AN ARTISTS RENDERING.

Seems legit.
Click to expand...

And to "denote different wavelengths to aid in scientific analysis."

Also you realize there are wavelengths we can't see right? Most of these images are light captured outside of human visible range, it's mapped so we can see it, even the B&W version. So what's the big deal assigning color to the pixels?
 
CrazyNutz said:
And to "denote different wavelengths to aid in scientific analysis."

Also you realize there are wavelengths we can't see right? Most of these images are light captured outside of human visible range, it's mapped so we can see it, even the B&W version. So what's the big deal assigning color to the pixels?
Click to expand...
So the finished appearance of the picture is even less accurate to the actual appearance of our "planet" is all you are telling me.
 
VonBonfire said:
Explain how a composite would make a better picture. Either resolution is good or it isn't good.
Click to expand...

I’m not going to explain composite photography to you. You are the one that is so hot to trot about it, you should already know how it works
 
CrazyNutz said:
And to "denote different wavelengths to aid in scientific analysis."

Also you realize there are wavelengths we can't see right? Most of these images are light captured outside of human visible range, it's mapped so we can see it, even the B&W version. So what's the big deal assigning color to the pixels?
Click to expand...

He realizes absolutely nothing lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top