Anyone else find it funny that PRS doesn’t offer a flatter radius on any of their models, other than the Holcomb, which is like $5k?!!
Yes it is odd. Even the McCarty SE has 10".
His excuse is old Les Pauls don't have 12" Radius anyway lol.
The LP's I played were 12" and some from the 60's.
I owned an SG =12" ES 347=12"
Don't like vintage Radius if less than 12"
Compound Radius¿ - because you play chords low on the Neck and leads high on the neck ? WTF ?
Are we playing Country Chords ?
I play chords everywhere on 14"
radius with medium jumbos.
12" Radius is fine with .047 high or close to it frets
And solos everywhere ...
And who thinks chords are easier on rounded fingerboards - lol.
Marketing hype- if you have good frets and setup it won't matter on chords [ and I use tones of voicings with 2 barrès etc and 6 fret stretches].
And for some like myself wide bends and vibrato are tougher on small radius boards ...
So I like that PRS uses angled headstocks on the Mayer Sig.
I wish Strats were like that.
I don't worship old Strats / old LPs - I think LPs age better than Strats because of the set necks .
But I think for resonance / sustain / tones the EJ Strats will beat most of the older ones anyway....
I don't own a LP or a EJ Strat - they both need taller frets for me .
I do find the EJs easy to play though and they sound excellent or great ...
But 10" is so specialized - suprised PRS never uses 12".
I think the SE's sound very good for the $...
I played a PRS 513 and the Radius didn't bother me - the proprietary pickups non standard size - for future proof- ness did bother me for that much money.
Rant ends here. Lol