PT100/PT50 poll... Which amp interests you the most?

  • Thread starter Thread starter petethorn
  • Start date Start date

Which amp would interest you the most?

  • PT 100 midi 3 or 4 channel head

    Votes: 68 62.4%
  • PT 50 simple Badger sized 2 channel head

    Votes: 25 22.9%
  • PT 20 simple Badger sized 2 channel head

    Votes: 16 14.7%

  • Total voters
    109
A 50 watter with half power for the bedroom heroes.3 channels ptp.2 masters and a boost.That would be awesome
:rock: :rock:
 
No offense to anyone but please Pete..John!!! No half power,power scaling or any of that crap (I said no offense meant to anyone!!! :D )
 
kurtsstuff":s4skwfk7 said:
No offense to anyone but please Pete..John!!! No half power,power scaling or any of that crap (I said no offense meant to anyone!!! :D )

+1 I don't care for that either...
 
I like the idea for the 50 watt but it should have the feedback control in some form or another and the headcase shouldnt be to small or different looking, The standby should be out front,I would like it to have a dual footswitchable master volumes for leads, and the gain knob should have a wider range allowing to do away with the 3rd channel on 50watt, and the midi on the 100 watter should be optional as I dont like having to pay for something I dont want or use thus making it more affordable. I also like the idea of a 25 to 30 watt with 6v6 as I like the 30 watt orange rocker and budda, sometimes 20watt is just not enough to gig. I have had many 100 watt 3 chan amps and hardly ever needed that much wattage and often the 3rd channel is too compressed. Looking forward to seeing new clips of the new designs etc and loved the ones in the past!!
 
I've had the PT for 18 months now and gigged it in all kind of situations.

IMHO power scaling is unnecessary as this is an amp that sounds killer with the volume down on 3-4 plus you have an extra MV with the loop level. 50w will just give less clean headroom and you lose those nice big sparkly Fender cleans.......
 
I voted for the 100watt, but as weird as it seems I'd probably want the 2 channel more. Why not 100 watt 2 channel with a half power switch? Dude make one a rack amp for me... Pleasssssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! :rock:
 
So anybody has an aproximate release date?

Brad teaming up with Mark Cameron has me split between the CCV and the PT-100...
 
Nico":3kse9j5s said:
So anybody has an aproximate release date?

Brad teaming up with Mark Cameron has me split between the CCV and the PT-100...
. I like the pt 100 better then the ccv as it seems more versatile with the ability to do the whole vintage voiced thing an get modern tones as well while to me the ccv is more of a metal toned amp overall. If u go ccv Just b sure u don't give any money for the amp up front to mark c himself or his other scammer friend that rooked many on here an never corrected it, I would only send money if brad gets involved an to him directly as he seems honest etc, I do like both but just like the pt better
 
garbagetruckdriver":zob8f6xc said:
I spent enough years of my life repairing electrical appliances. One truth is that the more complex they are, the more that can fail. Guitar amps are fragile enough as they are. For that reason, I say:

If you want to develop midi switching, make it in a separate module. Integrating it into the amp means that when something goes wrong, you lose the whole amp. Making it modular means if anything goes wrong, we can replace one simple module, or in case of emergency we can fall back to the footswitch tap-dance and get through the gig.


Rack-mountable midi module? :)
Sold separately for people interested, for those who don't need it, a rack space for an effects unit?
Maybe look into the possibility of the stereo relay switching of the G-major series(and of course a ton of other switching modules as well), and add two jacks as well, like M¤%a?
Ring open-ch1, ring closed-ch2, tip open-ch3, tip closed-ch4?
Disclaimer:
I don't know anything about electronics, I just throw stuff out there :lol: :LOL:

l_ea360d850967423898f26ce0df0a2e77.jpg
 
joepete77":qcclyea4 said:
Nico":qcclyea4 said:
So anybody has an aproximate release date?

Brad teaming up with Mark Cameron has me split between the CCV and the PT-100...
. I like the pt 100 better then the ccv as it seems more versatile with the ability to do the whole vintage voiced thing an get modern tones as well while to me the ccv is more of a metal toned amp overall. If u go ccv Just b sure u don't give any money for the amp up front to mark c himself or his other scammer friend that rooked many on here an never corrected it, I would only send money if brad gets involved an to him directly as he seems honest etc, I do like both but just like the pt better

Thats good to hear, yes I'd only sell money to Brad eventually if the price is right...

I was also thinking about the Friedman Brown Eye. Tough choices...
 
I like simple Fender/Marshall on steroids, PT50/100. MUST have power scaling, and auto-biasing!! Midi? Nah!
 
Hey Pete, could you ask John if he can figure out how to make them for under $2k? I'd love a PT100, but honestly, I'll never be able to afford one.
 
Back
Top