
fritzreiser":30nyzn0q said:Fantastic! Love seeing the SLO with the mids all the way up.
Excellent playing, btw!
JB6464":2o2czhmz said:Sounds good , what speakers are in the cab ?
Nice setup !Mr. Willy":1yeko2jg said:JB6464":1yeko2jg said:Sounds good , what speakers are in the cab ?
Speakers are 2 old English V30's on the bottom and 2 RI Greenbacks on top. PRS has a Bareknuckles VHII in the bridge. I'm goosing the front with an OCD set has more of a clean boost.
Badronald":27nttel9 said:Sounds great man!
I love the SLO.![]()
RG955TT":2mukckva said:The thing I really dig is high the high strings on a SLO ring out and are so defined for the amount of gain used. Sounds good man...real good
RG955TT":15ioad6t said:That's why I have my Hot Rod 25, sounds damn close and no ear bleed. Actually sounds better at useable volume to me. Still has that upper string thing going on too. I set my gain about the same as you BTW.
RG955TT":2ehazohz said:They are showing up used now, bought mine mint for $1500 which I thought was reasonable...get a used one from GC and return it if it doesn't out SLO your SLO
See, I don't get the 'ear bleed volume give up the goods' thing. I thought at 2, even a little earlier my SLOs sounded great. Maybe even better louder but after 3-4 it stayed unchanged tone wise. But I boosted mine a little maybe thats why. But I think Marshalls sound good at lower volumes too, and get better louder.RG955TT":32mw2856 said:I have both, the 25 is right there IMO some ways better as it gets the goods at realistic volumes and it has a proper loop that works and works well. Downside is 25 really doesn't have a true clean (or clean switch) but you can back off the gain enough to get there if needed. I like em both just that you don't need to get the 25 to ear bleed before it gives up the goods. The 25 is a bit more forgiving too, not as stiff it seems to me.