So, Regarding The VH4...

  • Thread starter Thread starter angelspade
  • Start date Start date
angelspade

angelspade

RT Kimg
Is the general consensus that the VH4 actually sounds and feels best running 6L6...and with bias set on the cold side?
 
Last edited:
Thats what I’ve experienced with mine.
Setting by ear, around 28ma is best -
6L6 Redbase , or GL KT77 best current tubes.
EI or HG 12ax7C V1 , Chinese in the middle , LPS in the PI.
 
Same for me.
I really like the open and clearer sound of the 6L6's in the VH4 after years of running 34's and 77's. Feels less congested. I felt like I was always trying to dial that factor out. The NFB mod helped for me too with the KT77's in there though.
(RubyMSTR) 6L6 or (GL) KT77- I usually end up running my bias about 30ma.
A nice V1, using a GL 12AX7 at the moment. tbh I think I'm running something different in V2 to tame ch4 a little bit, but I can't exactly recall what's in there right now.
 
I currently have KT77's biased normally in my 2004 VH4, but I prefer 6550's biased cold. I fiddled around in the Axe FX and this was the combination that clearly sounded the best. I've got a set ready for when the KT77's are wiped.

I definitely suggest trying a cold bias, though. Around 45-50% sounded best to me. It clears up the midrange congestion that Diezels sometimes have and will make the amp work better with a variety of speaker cabinets.

Just my two cents.
 
I currently have KT77's biased normally in my 2004 VH4, but I prefer 6550's biased cold. I fiddled around in the Axe FX and this was the combination that clearly sounded the best. I've got a set ready for when the KT77's are wiped.

I definitely suggest trying a cold bias, though. Around 45-50% sounded best to me. It clears up the midrange congestion that Diezels sometimes have and will make the amp work better with a variety of speaker cabinets.

Just my two cents.
Huh....I had no idea about the ideal bias range for a VH4. But I do remember when I got my old VH4, I had it re-tubed and clearly remember being told he had biased it "hot". I wonder if that is a key reason I hated that old script VH4; congested midrange is an apt description!
 
Same for me.
I really like the open and clearer sound of the 6L6's in the VH4 after years of running 34's and 77's. Feels less congested. I felt like I was always trying to dial that factor out. The NFB mod helped for me too with the KT77's in there though.
(RubyMSTR) 6L6 or (GL) KT77- I usually end up running my bias about 30ma.
A nice V1, using a GL 12AX7 at the moment. tbh I think I'm running something different in V2 to tame ch4 a little bit, but I can't exactly recall what's in there right now.
I need to give 6L6s a try on mine at some point. I tried KT77s in it but it made the amp super flubby in the bass for me. I then went back to EL34s which gives me the Adam Jones style tones I tend to prefer. Now if 6L6 gived a more open sound I definitely need to give it a shot.
 
I need to give 6L6s a try on mine at some point. I tried KT77s in it but it made the amp super flubby in the bass for me. I then went back to EL34s which gives me the Adam Jones style tones I tend to prefer. Now if 6L6 gived a more open sound I definitely need to give it a shot.
I've got EL34s as well....I definately need to try the 6L6s. It seems like everyone has similar thoughts. I love my VH4, but I really wish there was a light modification that would give the VH4 a touch more cirsp sizzle (like the Hagen) so I didnt have to push the presense so hard.
 
Last edited:
I put 6L6GCs in my VH4 two weeks ago to capture it into my Quad Cortex.
I tried 28mA per tube at first, but it didn't sound right to me,
so I increased it to 53% at 33mA, and it sounded perfect to me (thru 2x12 K100s, on top of 2x12 V30s).

When I switched back to KT77s, I set the Bias at 32mA per tube (59%)
Sounds perfect to my ears.
I personally love KT77s in my Diezels (VH4, VHX)
 
I kept all 4 diezels atf . I have kt77s in my vh4 atm and hate them . Going back to 6l6s 100
 
I've got EL34s as well....I definately need to try the 6L6s. It seems like everyone has similar thoughts. I loove my VH4, but I really wish there was a light modification that would give the VH4 a touch more cisp sizzle (like the Hagen) so I didnt have to push the presense so hard.
Did you ever try the negative feedback mod?
 
Did you ever try the negative feedback mod?
This one:

"If you move the NFB wire from the 8 ohm tap to the 4 ohm tap, what is physically changing is you are sending LESS negative feedback signal back to the phase inverter. The result is less damping of the PI output ( less compressed ) and more harmonic distortion (perceived as more brightness). This is a simplified technical explanation, but you get the idea"
 
This one:

"If you move the NFB wire from the 8 ohm tap to the 4 ohm tap, what is physically changing is you are sending LESS negative feedback signal back to the phase inverter. The result is less damping of the PI output ( less compressed ) and more harmonic distortion (perceived as more brightness). This is a simplified technical explanation, but you get the idea"
Yeah, that’s what you want if you want more top end and a more open sound.
 
This one:

"If you move the NFB wire from the 8 ohm tap to the 4 ohm tap, what is physically changing is you are sending LESS negative feedback signal back to the phase inverter. The result is less damping of the PI output ( less compressed ) and more harmonic distortion (perceived as more brightness). This is a simplified technical explanation, but you get the idea"
Yep, that’s the one. Probably about as simple as it gets for a modification.
 
I put 6L6GCs in my VH4 two weeks ago to capture it into my Quad Cortex.
I tried 28mA per tube at first, but it didn't sound right to me,
so I increased it to 53% at 33mA, and it sounded perfect to me (thru 2x12 K100s, on top of 2x12 V30s).

When I switched back to KT77s, I set the Bias at 32mA per tube (59%)
Sounds perfect to my ears.
I personally love KT77s in my Diezels (VH4, VHX)
Since you've been experimenting and capturing- You wouldn't happen to have any comparison clips would you? At some point I may have to do this if someone else hasn't already.
 
Since you've been experimenting and capturing- You wouldn't happen to have any comparison clips would you? At some point I may have to do this if someone else hasn't already.
I'm sorry, I didn't.
The 6L6s have a certain high-end sizzle.
The KT77s have a certain mid-congestion.
I prefer the mid-congestion. Others prefer the hi-end sizzle.
Only your ears, in the room, can decide which is right for you.
 
I appreciate it. Sometime soon I'll do a full shootout across the board.
 
I think I may have to try the previously referenced NFB mod and the 6L6s. I guess I can always go back as the mod it easily reverse. I love my VH4, but definitely like the idea of a slightly brighter, more present and aggressive flavor in the top end. That's the thing I miss most about the Hagen.
 
Last edited:
I think I may have to try the previously referenced NFB mod and the 6L6s. I guess I can always go back as the mod it easily reverse. I love my VH4, but definitely like the idea of a slightly brighter, more present and aggressive flavor in the top end. That's the thing I miss most about the Hagen.
I tried and I loved it, but I switched back to 8 ohm after a couple of weeks, simply to see if it was better on the 4 ohm tap or on the 8 ohm. Pay attention to the resistor and the condenser you have there, I use a FL cab and bass are less prominent, all the controls, mids are less "congested", and being naturally more scooped on the 4 ohm, you can crank them more without sounding honky. Deep control sounds good at 3 o'clock with no boominess. I'm thinking to rewire it on the 4 ohm and increase the value of one resistor to have a bit more bass. The solution to avoid this is change the cabinet in favour of a rear loaded one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top