
LP Freak
Well-known member
I use 550kWhat are the Benefits of No tone Control or 1 Meg Pot with the Aldrich?
I use 550kWhat are the Benefits of No tone Control or 1 Meg Pot with the Aldrich?
Thank you Sir.It will be brighter.
I like the Aldrich, personally, but I feel it benefits from either no tone control or 1 Meg pots on a Les Paul.
Each to his own, I personally don't find the Aldich any less compressed. I don't see how it could be. It's higher DCR, and I bet higher inductance too.
Someone had recommended the Suhr Aldrich humbucker trem-spaced for my Charvel model 5fx some time ago but I don't know that much about Suhr pickups?
Never played one but I know they were like the best thing going on here for awhile. A few years back anyway….
I understand, and I agree about DCR not being a 100% infallible indication of how a pickup is going to behave. But keep in mind that even if they're unarguably not the same pickup, comparing a Duncan Distortion and an Aldrich's DCR is a bit more apples to apples (not saying that it's 100% apples to apples, just to be clear) than comparing it to a stacked coil design with a radically different construction, coil dimensions, wire gauge, magnetic geometry, etc.DC resistance is not a sure indicator of dynamic response. For example, the DiMarzio HS-3 pickups that Yngwie used to use have a DCR of 23.72 K which is much higher than the DD and the Aldrich, and the HS-3's have great dynamic range and very low output.
output-wise they are similar, but they dont have the mid grind of the DD from my experience. the Aldrich is more like a sh5...How do they compare to a Duncan distortion?
The DD is just about the perfect pickup for me. I’ve been interested in an aldrich set though just not sure.
This is what i've always heard about the Aldrich. That it is meant to be similar to The JB But with better Clarity & a slightly tighter bottom end. I've also heard that most people especially those with Les Paul's end up just putting the JB Back in.I understand, and I agree about DCR not being a 100% infallible indication of how a pickup is going to behave. But keep in mind that even if they're unarguably not the same pickup, comparing a Duncan Distortion and an Aldrich's DCR is a bit more apples to apples (not saying that it's 100% apples to apples, just to be clear) than comparing it to a stacked coil design with a radically different construction, coil dimensions, wire gauge, magnetic geometry, etc.
I was just stating my experience. I'm not an expert in the Aldrich, honestly. But the Aldrich struck me as a more or less typical high-mid or low-high output pickup ala JB or Tone Zone. I would compare the Aldrich more to the JB than to the Distortion, personally, but even the Distortion and the JB have a lot in common. I'd personally even say the Distortion comes off (to me) as slightly less compressed than the JB, even if it's higher output because of the stronger (but more open-sounding) magnet.
To be clear, though. I'm not saying you're wrong in perceiving things the way you do. I was just stating that my experience as well as the pickup's specs might sugget otherwise. I don't know the full recipee of the Aldrich to be sure. Suhr could be using different alloys for the slugs and screws or the baseplate, different wire insulation, a radically different winding pattern, or anything that I don't know about. But there's also so much they can do to make a pickup that overwound keep dynamic sensitivity. And also, this is, after all, a discussion forum. I'm not saying I can't be proven wrong either.
![]()
Would it work well in an ESP Eclipse with ebony board?
I don't now if "tighter", personally. It's fatter. To me, a fatter pickup is almost always automatically looser.This is what i've always heard about the Aldrich. That it is meant to be similar to The JB But with better Clarity & a slightly tighter bottom end. I've also heard that most people especially those with Les Paul's end up just putting the JB Back in.
I Have a Brand New Set in Nickel just sitting at my house. I need to either install them or sell them.I don't now if "tighter", personally. It's fatter. To me, a fatter pickup is almost always automatically looser.
I don't have a problem with either's the JB's or the Aldrich's levels of tightness granted you use the right boost with either.
I'd say the Aldrich is just slightly throatier and darker.
Man that’s a hard sell. I’m not a thin scooped mids kind of guy and to keep the top end from getting shrill the mids in the DD are essential. I know the DD is a ceramic magnet JB. It’s just a great pickup.output-wise they are similar, but they dont have the mid grind of the DD from my experience. the Aldrich is more like a sh5...
I don't get that at all personally. To me, the Aldrich was not as stiff, warmer, and more organic than a JB. The reason I even got an Aldrich was because I saw the video of Doug Aldrich with his Les Pauls and wanted that whole tone. I even wanted the amp but couldn't get my hands on one, lol.This is what i've always heard about the Aldrich. That it is meant to be similar to The JB But with better Clarity & a slightly tighter bottom end. I've also heard that most people especially those with Les Paul's end up just putting the JB Back in.
I swapped that in as well. Matches really well with the bridge, no mud/ flub. The 'hotter PAF' description fits as well, IMHO.Anyone have experience with the Aldrich neck pickup?
I haven't heard much about that one....