Supreme Court rules against Death for Child Rapists..

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gainzilla
  • Start date Start date
Look at the bright side. That guy will likely still get what's coming to him, but the taxpayers won't have to pay the millions that an execution costs.
 
ratter":2zim33uh said:
Look at the bright side. That guy will likely still get what's coming to him, but the taxpayers won't have to pay the millions that an execution costs.

Good way of thinking, and probably true. Even hardcore cons know that people who mess with kids deserve no mercy. :gethim:
 
ratter":2ibdbx3f said:
Look at the bright side. That guy will likely still get what's coming to him, but the taxpayers won't have to pay the millions that an execution costs.
Absolutely!!! Even the most hardcore lifers dont tolerate those who perpetrate crimes against children
 
And as much as I hate to say it, I also agree with the ruling. You have to draw the line somewhere otherwise you are talking about a very slippery slope of allowing executions for crimes other than murder.
 
ratter":12w3i4p5 said:
And as much as I hate to say it, I also agree with the ruling. You have to draw the line somewhere otherwise you are talking about a very slippery slope of allowing executions for crimes other than murder.

As long as no extra money/effort/time is being spent protecting them from general population...
 
Like serial killers, pedophiles do not stop. They don't get better. With that in mind they either need life sentences or the death penalty. Children deserve protection! Someone ever commits a violent crime againts my kids, the cops better get them before I do because I will shoot them!!
 
I agree with Ratter that the line as to be set for capital punishment but at the same time if anyone violated my son I would want that person dead and I would be in the front row watching.

I honestly do not know what I would do.
 
yngzaklynch":1cm9m0q9 said:
Like serial killers, pedophiles do not stop. They don't get better. With that in mind they either need life sentences or the death penalty. Children deserve protection! Someone ever commits a violent crime againts my kids, the cops better get them before I do because I will shoot them!!

+1 Death is what they deserve. IMHO raping a child is far worse crime than killing someone, and it's just as permanent. The only punishment that I think would be better is if they sentenced the guy to a daily raping with a ball bat, or 2x4 for the rest of his life.
 
Bob Savage":frvoazzl said:
ratter":frvoazzl said:
And as much as I hate to say it, I also agree with the ruling. You have to draw the line somewhere otherwise you are talking about a very slippery slope of allowing executions for crimes other than murder.

As long as no extra money/effort/time is being spent protecting them from general population...

And therein lies the problem. They ARE protected from the population, and it's bullshit.

I'd rather see them on the yard than executed. A little taste of what it feels like to be terrified and victimized. Preferably (and likely) on a daily basis.

Sorry, I have kids. This shit pisses me off to no end.
 
Marshall Freak":3f64rc0e said:
yngzaklynch":3f64rc0e said:
Like serial killers, pedophiles do not stop. They don't get better. With that in mind they either need life sentences or the death penalty. Children deserve protection! Someone ever commits a violent crime againts my kids, the cops better get them before I do because I will shoot them!!

+1 Death is what they deserve. IMHO raping a child is far worse crime than killing someone, and it's just as permanent. The only punishment that I think would be better is if they sentenced the guy to a daily raping with a ball bat, or 2x4 for the rest of his life.

Which is why I'd like to see them in population :thumbsup:

Killing them is also fine. End of rant.
 
If you do a search for sex offenders in your area with that one website, its sickening to see how many child molestors there are in your city.. :thumbsdown:
 
zedocaixao":1nydd17f said:
ratter":1nydd17f said:
Look at the bright side. That guy will likely still get what's coming to him, but the taxpayers won't have to pay the millions that an execution costs.

Good way of thinking, and probably true. Even hardcore cons know that people who mess with kids deserve no mercy. :gethim:
He will likely die sooner that if they had upheld the death penalty ruling.
 
Fuck that. Anyone touches my kids and they'll end up with a baseball bat sized skewer up their ass, cooking on my gas grill and that's if I'm having a good day.
 
yngzaklynch":10zapp8f said:
Like serial killers, pedophiles do not stop.

Actually, serial killers will stop eventually. As the compulsions that drive them fade with age, they no longer kill, however, usually, they are caught before they age long enough to stop on their own...

Steve
 
psychodave":1qm3h0qt said:
Look at what this piece of shit Democrat says....

Regarding VICTIMS: "I'm gonna rip them apart," Fagan said of young victims during his testimony on the bill. "I'm going to make sure that the rest of their life is ruined, that when they’re 8 years old, they throw up; when they’re 12 years old, they won’t sleep; when they’re 19 years old, they’ll have nightmares and they’ll never have a relationship with anybody.”

Massachusetts deserves this guy!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,371344,00.html

What a douchebag, it literally sounds like hes going to rape the children himself :thumbsdown:
 
Marshall Freak":26t45msa said:
yngzaklynch":26t45msa said:
Like serial killers, pedophiles do not stop. They don't get better. With that in mind they either need life sentences or the death penalty. Children deserve protection! Someone ever commits a violent crime againts my kids, the cops better get them before I do because I will shoot them!!

+1 Death is what they deserve. IMHO raping a child is far worse crime than killing someone, and it's just as permanent. The only punishment that I think would be better is if they sentenced the guy to a daily raping with a ball bat, or 2x4 for the rest of his life.
+1000 :gethim:
 
I say they should remove their privates, everything. They can pee sitting down.
No sex organs, no sex drive.
 
Randy Van Sykes":3dpl3zlw said:
I say they should remove their privates, everything. They can pee sitting down.
No sex organs, no sex drive.

So you are saying that they should have their testicles removed by crazy 60 yr old feminists with child proof scissors?
 
tweed":ostqnbo5 said:
Randy Van Sykes":ostqnbo5 said:
I say they should remove their privates, everything. They can pee sitting down.
No sex organs, no sex drive.

So you are saying that they should have their testicles removed by crazy 60 yr old feminists with child proof scissors?
Sure or this guy.
new4_good.gif


Take it all and just stitch it up...just leave him a little hole to pee out of.
 
Back
Top