
Norton666
Member
I think this may convert a few Axe users. That being said , I'm getting one or the other very soon and this makes the decision even tougher. I was pretty well set on the Axe
rokket2005":2j1lh2hh said:yeah, i was going to be fine with the toaster, but I possibly wanted to get a 2/90/2 to run with it, and it would be easier to have them both in a rack.
danyeo":34zcsnrr said:Cool, now the ugly 1st generation one's will go cheaper in the classifieds.
Where do you put your lunch?King Guitar":2kkbylye said:The rack Kemper has all of the same features as the lunch box.
AwesomeVESmedic":y3y019gm said:A powered rack.... How fucking brilliant is that???
In more than just one way, eh?hoss33":1zlynx91 said:AwesomeVESmedic":1zlynx91 said:A powered rack.... How fucking brilliant is that???![]()
fuzzyguitars":3ezcrguu said:i wonder if there is any real difference between the rack and first version besides power?
What I see is a lot of Lunchbox guys who actually liked the design buying the light weight poweramp instead of selling them offstratotone":2cgpc9gj said:fuzzyguitars":2cgpc9gj said:i wonder if there is any real difference between the rack and first version besides power?
Not even that, apparently they have an upgrade for the 'lunchbox' versions that adds a poweramp too. Only difference I see between the two at all is a lack of two modulation knobs on the rackmount. They are also selling both as new products, so I don't think there is going to be a huge sell off of the old style either.