And well there is a lot of maths that goes into making solid projections and many do a bunch of other conventional things that while have some sense to them, don't really do a good job of using available stats and analytics to make solid projections.
The WAR-Ratio is pretty simple and from that you can apply the same logic to different aspects of the game from how to pick an FA to better build a team and just a better understanding of the game in the 21st century.The WAR-Ratio broken down to an equation and simple terms...... a lot of other maths and patience went over a month to get it down to this essentially and find that it applied to players with a WAR of atleast 1.5 or higher on average over 5 seasons...... this is how I was able to project MVP and Cy Young ahead of the "experts" for two seasons now along with other factors and considerations but mainly this.....
[(Players WAR average over 5 seasons)/(Projected WAR for next season)]
Vs whatever the "experts" and donkeys at MLB/ESPN/MLB on Fox or the Baseball Writers Association of America over the past 2 seasons and MLB powered by Google AI..... it's better than 1000 years of combined knowledge of said "experts" or the conventional wisdom of the past 100+ years or any other methodology in Baseball in the 21st Century.
Its kind of complicated but when broken down to an equation its a lot easier to understand. Any player below .7 is not consistent or overvalued in some cases, any player above .8 is decent and a player that will perform shy of projections but still decent, .9 and close to 1 means a player set to meet projections or come close to them and 1 or above 1 is undervalued in some cases or a player that is set to meet projections or out pace them most likely....... Pretty much assigning an F, D, C, B, A or A+ grade to the value of a player.