Tone differen RM100 vs Lynchbox

  • Thread starter Thread starter GtrGear
  • Start date Start date
G

GtrGear

New member
Besides the different powertubes are there more difference between the RM100-chassis and Lynchbox-chassis?
For instance different trannies? Different voicing?
 
I THINK the Lynchbox has depth and presence controls as well but I'm not 100% certain. I'm curious about this as well...
 
Power amp sections are voiced different. Also the density and presence control react different! I prefer the stock Rm 100 to the signature models for the power amp section and it's overall effect on the tone.
 
Thanks Jeff.
Personally I found the MOD50 and MOD100 poweramp voiced too vintage for me.
I preferred the MOD100 over the MOD50 because it has less mids and more low- and highend, more 'even' so to speak.
How does the Randall RM100 chassis sound different to the Egnater MOD100 soundwise?
 
GtrGear":2xqvby5a said:
Thanks Jeff.
Personally I found the MOD50 and MOD100 poweramp voiced too vintage for me.
I preferred the MOD100 over the MOD50 because it has less mids and more low- and highend, more 'even' so to speak.
How does the Randall RM100 chassis sound different to the Egnater MOD100 soundwise?


it is our MOD 100 with a cloned Heybeor from the MOD 100
 
Thanks Jeff, and the Lynch box has also a different OT that's voiced for George and EL34?
This means I do have to check the sound of the chassis' also?
(In Europe we can buy the RM100 and Lynch chassis empty but not the Kirk Hammet one)
 
the Lynch chassis is exactly the same but with el34's and different switches. No changes were made for his amp.
 
YEs we can but the CMEC is a really good transformer. Lynch preferred it to ours!

@Racksystems, Jeff Hilligan
So if I understand correctly both the RM100 and Lynch Box have the CMEC transformer?
 
Back
Top