Monkey Man
Super Moderator
However much it is, it's probably not as much as Pelosi.Giga.Blast":g23b4hbc said:What dosage of Adderall do you estimate Schiff takes throughout each day - 90mg?
spliffsperlunk
Active member
JTyson
Well-known member
Well I have no doubt at all you would define it that way, but the more relevant thing is, none of the 3 witnesses when asked directly if a crime had taken place did.. All three said "no"Ry Manchu":1uglbzee said:JTyson":1uglbzee said:Might as well face it, you got nothing.. Not now or in the cataclysmic next bombshell act where the walls are closing in on the orange man
As it turns out, you don't have anyone smart enough to take down the dumbest man on the planet...
There will be no removal from office, and he will make all of you hate life for 4 more years. You cannot escape it. You might as well start buying gas cans to light yourselves on fire and seeking tall buildings to jump off of. My advice would be to pick a building that has concrete around the base where you will land and not grass, you will feel less at impact. Take some friends with you and you can all hold hands and jump together, showing your unity, and if you pick the right friends, your diversity!
Think of the statement you will all make, and you will avoid the end of the world in 10 more years due to cows farting
Its the only win/win left for you...
Meanwhile, the normal people who have functioning brains will enjoy life with the record breaking economy, taking vacations we haven't had in 15 years, putting money up in our retirement funds, buying new and exciting amps and sometimes even old vintage models that make us all gush and drool on ourselves. We might even develop a gasoline powered tube amp, just because we can now that we are fully energy independent for the first time in our lifetime
Oh, and also lots of scary guns. Its a fantastic time to buy them, the market is saturated, prices are down on some models. You can buy two for the price of one during Obama's years
I would not define the President abusing his power to put the interests of his campaign over the interests of national security as "nothing." I would define it as high crimes and misdemeanors.
No one with a properly functioning brains is an avid supporter of Donald Trump.
You are right about the energy independence. Thanks Dick Cheney, Barack Obama and the massive shale fields for the energy independence. The path towards energy independence has slowed under Trump, just so you know. And we still import 10.2 million barrels of oil per day.
As for jumping off a building, why don't you try it first and I'll think about it after that.
And there is the end of the fairy tale
But of course, we all know it won't be, we will have 30 more hours of watching perhaps the lamest fake moral outrage from the left we've seen yet, and the orange man must be stopped due to his all-encompassing evil nature and total disregard of what the left thinks about him.
All they will accomplish is insuring that more and more people will gain that same total disregard of them, and the lemmings that lick their boots, so knock yourselves out
Meanwhile, Durham is getting closer to the hammer falling. And they all know it
JTyson
Well-known member
spliffsperlunk":1q9pt0fq said:
Giga.Blast
Banned
Well-known member
Can this be remotely possible? Schiff is reading simultaneously in real-time Trump’s threating “Tweet” to Yovanovitch in court during testimony to Congress. This does not even come close to passing any metaphor - smell test. We already had (or had) the TDS, what’s next, the TWPPS? (Trump Witness Protection Program Syndrome)
Yo 311, I must apologize, you are clearly the dullest knife in the kitchen drawer and you are not helping our cause here. 311, you cannot impeach a president based on a claim from a person that overheard another person having a different conversation ostensibly with Trump about all this delusional fake rotten horseshit. 311, how much more would you like to be schooled on how the inadmissible act of “hearsay” might occur and be thrown out of any US court of law - huh?
Furthermore, the sole duty of the ambassador to the POTUS is to faithfully execute the orders and policies, current and grandfathered in, or be removed and promptly replaced.
In any event, us Dems better get to start preparing for preparations cuz the boomerang’s gonna come a back around ta haunt us – ya think dat be a youfamism? We can’t be pivoting on our fake charade indefinitely.
Boom!
Yo 311, I must apologize, you are clearly the dullest knife in the kitchen drawer and you are not helping our cause here. 311, you cannot impeach a president based on a claim from a person that overheard another person having a different conversation ostensibly with Trump about all this delusional fake rotten horseshit. 311, how much more would you like to be schooled on how the inadmissible act of “hearsay” might occur and be thrown out of any US court of law - huh?
Furthermore, the sole duty of the ambassador to the POTUS is to faithfully execute the orders and policies, current and grandfathered in, or be removed and promptly replaced.
In any event, us Dems better get to start preparing for preparations cuz the boomerang’s gonna come a back around ta haunt us – ya think dat be a youfamism? We can’t be pivoting on our fake charade indefinitely.
Boom!
311boogieman
Well-known member
^ Great song!
Also, if you are referring to my post from last Wednesday I was being sarcastic.
Also, if you are referring to my post from last Wednesday I was being sarcastic.
Giga.Blast
Banned
Well-known member
spliffsperlunk
Active member
R
Ry Manchu
Banned
Well-known member
JTyson":2j190ql8 said:Well I have no doubt at all you would define it that way, but the more relevant thing is, none of the 3 witnesses when asked directly if a crime had taken place did.. All three said "no"
And there is the end of the fairy tale
All they will accomplish is insuring that more and more people will gain that same total disregard of them, and the lemmings that lick their boots, so knock yourselves out
Really? You must be watching different testimonies than me, because not one of the three offered an opinion as to whether a crime had taken place. You really should stop believing everything that you read on those right-wing spin sites.
John Ratcliffe: "So, in this impeachment hearing today, where we impeach presidents for treason or bribery or other high crimes, where is the impeachable offense in that call? Are either of you here today to assert there was an impeachable offense in that call?"
Bill Taylor: ""I’m not here to take one side or the other, that’s your decision.....I would just like to say that I’m not here to do anything having to do with the … to decide about impeachment. That is not what either of us are here to do. This is your job."
Kent nodded in agreement.
lester
Well-known member
You actually watched that shit?
There is something seriously wrong with you.
There is something seriously wrong with you.
R
Ry Manchu
Banned
Well-known member
I prefer to actually observe firsthand and have an informed idea of what I am talking about rather than the parroted regurgitation and regurgitated parroting that you two do. And the irony that you call me a lemming is once again not lost on me. Enjoy your pablum.
lester
Well-known member
Not going so well huh?
That's too bad
That's too bad
Giga.Blast
Banned
Well-known member
JTyson
Well-known member
I watched them all 3 say "no" to the same question. Its there, you must have been throwing up in a trashcan at that time. Strange you would have missed the most relevant question posed to all 3 of them, you know, since you like getting all your info first hand and allRy Manchu":l6lbtgkk said:JTyson":l6lbtgkk said:Well I have no doubt at all you would define it that way, but the more relevant thing is, none of the 3 witnesses when asked directly if a crime had taken place did.. All three said "no"
And there is the end of the fairy tale
All they will accomplish is insuring that more and more people will gain that same total disregard of them, and the lemmings that lick their boots, so knock yourselves out
Really? You must be watching different testimonies than me, because not one of the three offered an opinion as to whether a crime had taken place. You really should stop believing everything that you read on those right-wing spin sites.
John Ratcliffe: "So, in this impeachment hearing today, where we impeach presidents for treason or bribery or other high crimes, where is the impeachable offense in that call? Are either of you here today to assert there was an impeachable offense in that call?"
Bill Taylor: ""I’m not here to take one side or the other, that’s your decision.....I would just like to say that I’m not here to do anything having to do with the … to decide about impeachment. That is not what either of us are here to do. This is your job."
Kent nodded in agreement.
Go back and look again, maybe Mika didn't cover that part in the msnbc wrap up for you. In a matter of seconds all the mud your side has been flinging at the wall like chimps at the zoo was shot down in flames
In any case, you still have nothing. Except for witnesses who did not witness anything, 2nd and 3rd hand opinions of a conversation none of them heard and an ex ambassador who got her feelings hurt when she was fired.
Carry on
spliffsperlunk
Active member
Schiff turns into a statue .
R
Ry Manchu
Banned
Well-known member
JTyson":2gaoizgm said:I watched them all 3 say "no" to the same question. Its there, you must have been throwing up in a trashcan at that time. Strange you would have missed the most relevant question posed to all 3 of them, you know, since you like getting all your info first hand and all
Wrong.
JTyson":2gaoizgm said:In any case, you still have nothing. Except for witnesses who did not witness anything, 2nd and 3rd hand opinions of a conversation none of them heard and an ex ambassador who got her feelings hurt when she was fired. Carry on
Wrong. Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams and David Holmes are all firsthand witnesses.
JTyson
Well-known member
Ry Manchu":2ow40ukp said:JTyson":2ow40ukp said:I watched them all 3 say "no" to the same question. Its there, you must have been throwing up in a trashcan at that time. Strange you would have missed the most relevant question posed to all 3 of them, you know, since you like getting all your info first hand and all
Wrong.
Wrong as in they did not say "no" ?
All you have to do is watch it and you will see it firsthand, as you like to say
Or wrong as in you used something else to throw up in?
Well, I was guessing as to why you missed that, oh well
JTyson":2ow40ukp said:In any case, you still have nothing. Except for witnesses who did not witness anything, 2nd and 3rd hand opinions of a conversation none of them heard and an ex ambassador who got her feelings hurt when she was fired. Carry on
Wrong. Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams and David Holmes are all firsthand witnesses.
To what exactly? A conversation we all have the transcripts to ? Name the crime. Be specific
If a crime was committed
Then this should be a slam dunk, correct?
If the orange man had done a fraction of what they have said he did, this should be the easiest impeachment ever...
You got nothing
You never did.. Not now or in the next BOMBSHELL revelation that will be spoon fed to you by the same people who have been wrong about everything from day 1..
Being wrong is becoming a way of life for the left.. And everyone but them knows it. Its funny and sad at the same time..
Shouldn't the economy be collapsing by now? I mean, we were told 3 years ago we would not make it through the first 100 days by those same bootlickers you listen to, and again... Wrong
R
Ry Manchu
Banned
Well-known member
JTyson if you have something sane, rational and coherent to say, then I would love to respond. I will not entertain insanity.
spliffsperlunk
Active member
Ry Manchu":3m8cmawe said:
Orly ?
Giga.Blast
Banned
Well-known member
This is the fundamental definition of insanity.
Hey dude, 2+2 will always equal 4 (sum modulo 10). When a person will ask the same question, multiple times, expecting a different answer in return each time, this is the act of insanity – MR. GOLDMAN
As the Dems (Trump Haters) lurch and pivot forward once again multiple times through European hoax after hoax, what will their next alternative false narrative be?
Hey dude, 2+2 will always equal 4 (sum modulo 10). When a person will ask the same question, multiple times, expecting a different answer in return each time, this is the act of insanity – MR. GOLDMAN
As the Dems (Trump Haters) lurch and pivot forward once again multiple times through European hoax after hoax, what will their next alternative false narrative be?