
chunktone
Active member
Giga":1lsn920l said:What about 3 poweramp sections to make a WDW rig possible with only 1 poweramp ?
Giga.

Giga":1lsn920l said:What about 3 poweramp sections to make a WDW rig possible with only 1 poweramp ?
Giga.
Gainfreak":37aezv9d said:Tone Merchant":37aezv9d said:If a company was going to design a new tube power amp for preamps, should the unit be stereo or mono and what features would you like to see?
Full/Half power
the ability to use/choose multiple tubes for the o/p section
Stereo but with bridged mono feature or the ability to use only one channel without popping a tube and the unused channel.
Fail safe for those knucklehead moment that you might turn the poweramp on without a speaker load
Independant Presence controls for both chanels
Independent graphic EQ for Each Channel...If set to flat Its flat.
Footswitchable EQ....on/off for more tone shaping.
When it comes to Tube Poweramps most companies overlook the Bridged mono feature. It's a fact that not everyone will like to lug multiple cabs to a gig for a stereo rig and/or have to re-wire there mono 2x12 - 4x12 in order to use the poweramp!!![]()
All the best!!
~R~
manyaxes":3hn0qsfx said:I still can't understand why would 95% of guitars players want a stereo power amp. Right now we are forced to lug around stereo monsters that weigh more than a good head, and that's just for the power amp, and most people don't even use it! They just feed the same signal to both channels. On top of that, people who DO actually use the stereo capability, just have a stereo 4x12 cab, with very little separation between fields, so the player is lucky to get any stereo separation, and the audience won't get any. Real stereo is achieved with two cabs, one each side of the band, or micing two cones (make sure they correspond to different channels!) and going to FOH.
Why doesn't anyone make a good mono poweramp, with only one transformer, smaller and much lighter, and if you need stereo you can always buy another mono one and just carry when you need it, or have one at rehearsal, one at home and get both when actually necessary!
Greazygeo":99epp3da said:It should weigh at least 200 lbs.
manyaxes":3m2uikyz said:I still can't understand why would 95% of guitars players want a stereo power amp. Right now we are forced to lug around stereo monsters that weigh more than a good head, and that's just for the power amp, and most people don't even use it! They just feed the same signal to both channels. On top of that, people who DO actually use the stereo capability, just have a stereo 4x12 cab, with very little separation between fields, so the player is lucky to get any stereo separation, and the audience won't get any. Real stereo is achieved with two cabs, one each side of the band, or micing two cones (make sure they correspond to different channels!) and going to FOH.
Why doesn't anyone make a good mono poweramp, with only one transformer, smaller and much lighter, and if you need stereo you can always buy another mono one and just carry when you need it, or have one at rehearsal, one at home and get both when actually necessary!
blackba":24d2p8cy said:I have thought the same thing. Also alot of people complain about the volume of getting a 100Watt Marshall amp into its groove, yet alot of these power amps are 100Watts per side. I know its not that much louder, but I doubt most people need the headroom.
guitarslinger":2em2n25v said:blackba":2em2n25v said:I have thought the same thing. Also alot of people complain about the volume of getting a 100Watt Marshall amp into its groove, yet alot of these power amps are 100Watts per side. I know its not that much louder, but I doubt most people need the headroom.
It's about the sound, man. I hate the sound of a dimed power section. It sounds like crispy, sonic meltdown. It's not my bag. Power tube distortion only muddies up the sound of a good preamp, IMO.
Every power amp sounds different, regardless of power amount. It just so happens, the best sounding power amps have the most power.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll take the tone(AND volume) of a VHT 2150 any day over some underpowered 20/20 with teensy weensy transformers in one rack space.
![]()
![]()
![]()
guitarslinger":3aon4l2b said:It's about the sound, man. I hate the sound of a dimed power section. It sounds like crispy, sonic meltdown. It's not my bag. Power tube distortion only muddies up the sound of a good preamp, IMO.
Every power amp sounds different, regardless of power amount. It just so happens, the best sounding power amps have the most power.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll take the tone(AND volume) of a VHT 2150 any day over some underpowered 20/20 with teensy weensy transformers in one rack space.
![]()
![]()
![]()
stephen sawall":212a4zwm said:. I wish I could just turn off 2 of the power tubes.
Class A![]()
I belive you guys that feel more power is not needed do not like a ton of bass. The more power ~ the more clean bass is there.
I like a "stupid" amount of tight bass. Small amps do not do this.
The amount of power to get below 40 hertz is......