Just so
your'e CLEAR:
1) he says he has no wife
2) If he does it's his EX wife (family no longer)
If he's Donnie, he said long ago that she left him and accepted him back, the latter part's being ignored for convenience by many here. I've seen his freakin' utility bills from this year FFS, and she's on 'em.
This is besides the point 'though. Ex's are still family. She's his kids' mom and his grandkids' grandmother. In which universe is that not family?
3) I've seen the divorce papers so it's 100% factual by law
I saw them too and it was an application only.
Still irrelevant; she's the mother of his kids and grandmother of his grandkids, making her family.
So, why do I get banned for a non existent?
'Cause this non-existent exists and is family... if he's Donnie, which you and others claim he is.
All this said, non-existent, Donnie or not, you didn't treat her as a non-existent in your offending comments, did you? Absolutely-not, so there's that.
Also, he runs around shitting on everyone and every post yet he walks AND stalks around like he owns the place.
... he's running around like a dog off a leash pissing on everything.
Pointing the finger at what someone else does is
irrelevant. "Look at what
he does your Honour...".
I've tried to explain this to many members here over the years, which frankly I find embarrassing; it's kindergarten-level stuff, like, "... but
he started it..." or "... what
he's doing is worse".
I appreciate rules are rules, HOWEVER, the rules should be tailored and updated to stop this lying low life POS from fucking everything over.
He's making it miserable for the majority here...if people don't agree please chime in and say so.
... and yet whatever he's doing, he's managed to not break the rules, something you yourself have just done.
Look man, I understand how you feel
of course. When one sets up a FoS forum, one has to be prepared to cop the good with the bad. One can't legislate against stupidity, abrasive character traits, difficult personalities and so on. Do that and you're heading into 1984 territory.
It's easy for folks to declare that they're all for FoS but the second it inconveniences them, all but the most-committed end up complaining.
Just sayin'.
Hopefully my detailed responses to your questions, none of which should have been necessary, are in some way appreciated brother. I'm sure you'd know I didn't enjoy issuing the 1-day thing; you left me no choice. To be safe, follow my tip I've mentioned many times - if there's a verb involved and you're daring to describe sexual activity of another member, beware.
