theNoseBleedKid":j171trs0 said:
Well you said you didn't have a problem with their deaths, but a problem with the method of their deaths. So you support them dying, but not Joe Horn?
Thought you were talking about the death penalty...
And while you started going in the general direction of my point, you veered way off into Failsville. Is death an appropriate punishment for breaking and entering? No, not at all, which is why no one will get capital punishment for it. But when you break into someones house, in Texas of all places, its the risk you take. I can feel for their families, and if I knew something about their lives there's the possibility that I could sympathize with the conditions that lead to this event (to a certain degree), but its really hard to take pity on them when they knowingly violated the law and knowingly put their lives at risk for quick cash
Juggernaut":j171trs0 said:
I'm not gonna argue costs.... cause like everything else, the government would spend it on something even more trivial than the death penalty. Honestly, I dont know, facts from both sides are thrown around, and who knows who's telling the truth.......
As far as the Death Penalty, I'm sorry, some people do not deserve to live in this world, and when they decide to deprive someone else of the right to live (in the act of a crime), they give up their own. period.
my opinion, take it or leave it, sorry.
I agree, costs aren't the main issue at heart here, and while I may not agree I'm going to leave it at that because that's a different discussion entirely which I feel no need to go into
People
were arguing costs though, and I did feel the need to correct them