What to know about COVID-19 study that was finally published after being blocked by CDCThe study was originally meant to be published in a CDC weekly

Alpha Stryke

Alpha Stryke

Well-known member
A study looking at the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine was published Tuesday after it was blocked from being included in a weekly report from the federal government.

The study, conducted by researchers at the CDC and researchers in California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Texas and Utah, looked at the effectiveness of the 2025-26 vaccine among adults aged 18 and older, who did not have weakened immune systems, during the fall and winter of 2025.

The study estimated the updated vaccines lowered the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization by 55% and COVID-19-related emergency department or urgent care visits by 50%, compared with those not receiving the shot.

The authors noted the study did not account for whether people had a previous COVID-19 infection or earlier COVID-19 vaccines, so the results may show the added protection from the 2025-26 vaccine on top of any immunity people may already have.





https://abcnews.com/Health/covid-19-study-finally-published-after-blocked-cdc/story?id=134180233
 
A study looking at the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine was published Tuesday after it was blocked from being included in a weekly report from the federal government.

The study, conducted by researchers at the CDC and researchers in California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Texas and Utah, looked at the effectiveness of the 2025-26 vaccine among adults aged 18 and older, who did not have weakened immune systems, during the fall and winter of 2025.

The study estimated the updated vaccines lowered the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization by 55% and COVID-19-related emergency department or urgent care visits by 50%, compared with those not receiving the shot.

The authors noted the study did not account for whether people had a previous COVID-19 infection or earlier COVID-19 vaccines, so the results may show the added protection from the 2025-26 vaccine on top of any immunity people may already have.





https://abcnews.com/Health/covid-19-study-finally-published-after-blocked-cdc/story?id=134180233
Boost up, Fatass, boost up. :hys: :hys:
 
This guy's still fucking around with covid

I bet he wishes a comeback for 2028 along with eboli

It will all naturally be trumps fault, blame and responsibility

xwzruf1752803579216.webp
 
This guy's still fucking around with covid

I bet he wishes a comeback for 2028 along with eboli

It will all naturally be trumps fault, blame and responsibility

View attachment 451279
I never understood the people who were 50-100lbs overweight freaking out about unvaxxed people possibly affecting their health negatively. Total clown show. 🤡
 
Ehh, I'll be lazy and let Aye-Eye type all this shit out for me. Here...

When everyone who can be vaccinated gets the shot, it creates a "shield" of community immunity. This drastically reduces the spread of infectious diseases, keeping healthcare costs down, and protecting vulnerable people who cannot receive vaccines, such as infants, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Broad vaccination limits disease transmission in a few specific ways: [1]

  • Herd Protection: When a high percentage of the population is immune to a pathogen, the virus or bacteria has a hard time circulating. It hits a "dead end," protecting individuals who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. [1, 2]
  • Individual Safety: Even for those who are vaccinated, no vaccine provides 100% protection. Surrounding yourself with immune individuals lowers your overall exposure risk, making you significantly less likely to get sick. [1, 2]
  • Preventing Viral Mutations: When a disease infects fewer people, it has less opportunity to multiply and mutate into new variants that could evade existing immunizations. [1]
  • Avoiding Severe Illness: Getting vaccinated prevents serious health complications, hospitalizations, and long-term side effects that often come with natural infection. [1]
 
Ehh, I'll be lazy and let Aye-Eye type all this shit out for me. Here...

When everyone who can be vaccinated gets the shot, it creates a "shield" of community immunity. This drastically reduces the spread of infectious diseases, keeping healthcare costs down, and protecting vulnerable people who cannot receive vaccines, such as infants, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Broad vaccination limits disease transmission in a few specific ways: [1]

  • Herd Protection: When a high percentage of the population is immune to a pathogen, the virus or bacteria has a hard time circulating. It hits a "dead end," protecting individuals who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. [1, 2]
  • Individual Safety: Even for those who are vaccinated, no vaccine provides 100% protection. Surrounding yourself with immune individuals lowers your overall exposure risk, making you significantly less likely to get sick. [1, 2]
  • Preventing Viral Mutations: When a disease infects fewer people, it has less opportunity to multiply and mutate into new variants that could evade existing immunizations. [1]
  • Avoiding Severe Illness: Getting vaccinated prevents serious health complications, hospitalizations, and long-term side effects that often come with natural infection. [1]
Half truths and distortions IMO.

Case in point: tetanus. Tetanus was on the decrease PRIOR TO VACCINES thanks to proper wound care. But people repeat YOU NEED A TETANUS SHOT as though it were gospel and as if you'll be a dead man if you step on a rusty nail=guaranteed LOCKJAW. It's all fear driven language and at the end of the day you follow the money trail and where does it lead?
 
With tetanus it's just playing the odds. I love analogies, indulge me please.

Tetanus = bullet to the chest
Tetanus vaccine = bullet 'proof' vest

The shot in the chest may not kill you but the vest is cheap insurance.

Smallpox and polio (almost) were considered eliminated thanks to vaccines. Measles *used* to be near eliminated. But, people exercising their rights screwed things up. I'm with Spock on this one. "Needs of the many...".

But your body, your choice. Right?
 
With tetanus it's just playing the odds. I love analogies, indulge me please.

Tetanus = bullet to the chest
Tetanus vaccine = bullet 'proof' vest

The shot in the chest may not kill you but the vest is cheap insurance.

Smallpox and polio (almost) were considered eliminated thanks to vaccines. Measles *used* to be near eliminated. But, people exercising their rights screwed things up. I'm with Spock on this one. "Needs of the many...".

But your body, your choice. Right?

A.I: "Yes, tetanus rates and deaths were already on the decline in the early 1900s before the vaccine was widely used."
 
A study looking at the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine was published Tuesday after it was blocked from being included in a weekly report from the federal government.

The study, conducted by researchers at the CDC and researchers in California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Texas and Utah, looked at the effectiveness of the 2025-26 vaccine among adults aged 18 and older, who did not have weakened immune systems, during the fall and winter of 2025.

The study estimated the updated vaccines lowered the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization by 55% and COVID-19-related emergency department or urgent care visits by 50%, compared with those not receiving the shot.

The authors noted the study did not account for whether people had a previous COVID-19 infection or earlier COVID-19 vaccines, so the results may show the added protection from the 2025-26 vaccine on top of any immunity people may already have.





https://abcnews.com/Health/covid-19-study-finally-published-after-blocked-cdc/story?id=134180233
Yep, the vaccines worked and prevented massive collapse of health care systems around the world. Cheers to the scientists who developed these life saving medicines!
 
Ehh, I'll be lazy and let Aye-Eye type all this shit out for me. Here...

When everyone who can be vaccinated gets the shot, it creates a "shield" of community immunity. This drastically reduces the spread of infectious diseases, keeping healthcare costs down, and protecting vulnerable people who cannot receive vaccines, such as infants, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Broad vaccination limits disease transmission in a few specific ways: [1]

  • Herd Protection: When a high percentage of the population is immune to a pathogen, the virus or bacteria has a hard time circulating. It hits a "dead end," protecting individuals who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. [1, 2]
  • Individual Safety: Even for those who are vaccinated, no vaccine provides 100% protection. Surrounding yourself with immune individuals lowers your overall exposure risk, making you significantly less likely to get sick. [1, 2]
  • Preventing Viral Mutations: When a disease infects fewer people, it has less opportunity to multiply and mutate into new variants that could evade existing immunizations. [1]
  • Avoiding Severe Illness: Getting vaccinated prevents serious health complications, hospitalizations, and long-term side effects that often come with natural infection. [1]
Yeah I understand that. It only matters if the vaccination is effective. It still puts you, the vaccinated, in no danger if the vaccine is effective and you encounter unvaccinated people.

Herd immunity is also effected by natural immunity.
 
A study looking at the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine was published Tuesday after it was blocked from being included in a weekly report from the federal government.

The study, conducted by researchers at the CDC and researchers in California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Texas and Utah, looked at the effectiveness of the 2025-26 vaccine among adults aged 18 and older, who did not have weakened immune systems, during the fall and winter of 2025.

The study estimated the updated vaccines lowered the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization by 55% and COVID-19-related emergency department or urgent care visits by 50%, compared with those not receiving the shot.

The authors noted the study did not account for whether people had a previous COVID-19 infection or earlier COVID-19 vaccines, so the results may show the added protection from the 2025-26 vaccine on top of any immunity people may already have.





https://abcnews.com/Health/covid-19-study-finally-published-after-blocked-cdc/story?id=134180233
You sir, are a fucking moron.

I’ve wondered….are you just a troll that likes getting shit on all day?

But that’s not it. You are actually a fucking moron.

I usually just skip on past your brain rot posts and threads but I have a particular hatred for the Covid crimes against humanity that I just had to read your post.

I’ve now wasted a few minutes I’ll never get back reading that garbage and responding to your nonsense.

Fuck right off with your Covid bullshit. Fill yourself with that poison. You can have my shots you fucking commie retard.
 
Last edited:
Yep, the vaccines worked and prevented massive collapse of health care systems around the world. Cheers to the scientists who developed these life saving medicines!
Buddy, you appear to have decent taste in music…

But you are also a fucking moron if you believe the Covid vax had a net positive on humanity.

Dump the ideology. It’s not helping you.
 
Back
Top