What to know about COVID-19 study that was finally published after being blocked by CDCThe study was originally meant to be published in a CDC weekly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alpha Stryke
  • Start date Start date
Lol to those calling the clot shot a vaccine.

All of you: remember, they actually had to change the definition of what a vaccine is as they were introducing it.

Conflating good vaccines and their benefits to man with the clot shot is pathetic. They are NOT the same thing.

Vaccines prevent illnesses from happening.

The clot shot did not. Therefore, it is not a vaccine.

Plain and simple.


Oh, and covid was never as contagious as they said it was.

Nobody died from the flu that year, oddly. Coincidence?
 
I saw those flu numbers and I knew it was a complete lie. Thousands of those Covid cases were just the flu or other colds. Having said that, Covid was real and a lot of people were not helping by claiming it was the same as the flu. When I had Covid, I noticed that there was a lot of vessel inflammation, which gave me a nasty headache. I also lost my sense of smell for 3 weeks -- that never happened to me whenever I got the flu or a common cold. Fortunately though, I recovered in 3 days.
 
Lol to those calling the clot shot a vaccine.

All of you: remember, they actually had to change the definition of what a vaccine is as they were introducing it.

Conflating good vaccines and their benefits to man with the clot shot is pathetic. They are NOT the same thing.

Vaccines prevent illnesses from happening.

The clot shot did not. Therefore, it is not a vaccine.

Plain and simple.


Oh, and covid was never as contagious as they said it was.

Nobody died from the flu that year, oddly. Coincidence?
At this point all vaccines need to be scrutinized since Big Pharma does not have to provide safety studies released to the public because they don't have to due to the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act passed by the GOV, Big Pharma has 100% no liability on all of their vaxxx products. If your car has a defect that the car manufacturer knew or may have known about and that defect causes harm to you or your family they are liable for any and all damages and can be sued for damages. There is a reason the preamble to the 1986 Vaccine Injury LAW states they are "Unavoidably Unsafe". That statement is quite clear and concise.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it disturbing that the vaccine companies would be out of business if they had liability? Lawsuits would have already put them under.
I challenge any one here to try to find an online version of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act Preamble "Unavoidably Unsafe" that RFK noted in this Tucker interview of which he knows if he misstates anything he could be held to account and possible lose his law license. I have not been able to find anything on line it's like the preamble statement doesn't exist at least on line yet RFK has read it and actually used it in one of his cases in which he won the case for the vaccine injured child.
 
Do you mean this document? Or something else?

"(b) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS; WARNINGS.—"(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action; . for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this subtitle if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

They were definitely planning something very big back then, and it was mostly about $$.
 
Do you mean this document? Or something else?

"(b) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS; WARNINGS.—"(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action; . for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this subtitle if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

They were definitely planning something very big back then, and it was mostly about $$.
This text, changing the defintion of vaccine and President Puddin' Cup's preemptive pardon of Heir Fauci should tell everyone all they need to know.
 
Do you mean this document? Or something else?

"(b) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS; WARNINGS.—"(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action; . for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this subtitle if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

They were definitely planning something very big back then, and it was mostly about $$.
That may be it but I don't think so. The preamble to the law should be in the first sections of the law/bill that explains the need for the law. RFK publicly quoted the preamble clearly states that vaccines were and are "Unavoidable Unsafe" yet online I cannot find any specific reference about the preamble that RFK has read and quoted.

I asked some computer savvy friends of mine to try to find the exact preamble to the 1986 ACT and they could not find that specific passage. I doubt RFK would open himself to litigation making that statement as he did. Something tells me the PTB don't want that preamble statement easily downloadable.
 
Last edited:
This text, changing the defintion of vaccine and President Puddin' Cup's preemptive pardon of Heir Fauci should tell everyone all they need to know.
It seems the US oligarchy can pardon itself from any possible past and or future crimes against humanity and gets no pushback from the populace.
1783026414566.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top