Yet another video of ICE Gestapo Pigs committing ASSAULT. ARREST THEM NOW!!!!

[JDs Couch]

What makes you think I don’t do that already ?

Brutalizing your cock doesn't count.

 

[Geo]

This is bullshit, but if it was true, then by your own logic all these Dems were way better at the thing that Trump claims to be his top priority...

Bob Weir said it's true.

 

[JDs Couch]

Once again, you don't have a fucking clue about how things work. So how about you stop referencing OUR Constitution when you troll. Mmmmkayyy?

Seems that you don't have a fucking clue.

"Americans have a constitutional right to protest peacefully and a general right to photograph or film events, including the police, when lawfully present in public spaces. These rights are protected primarily by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech, press, and assembly."

The First Amendment provides broad protection to individuals who want to express their views about immigration enforcement, including opposition to ICE activity. People have the constitutional right to participate in peaceful demonstrations in traditional public forums such as streets, parks, and sidewalks. They may chant slogans, hold signs, document law enforcement activity, and speak with other community members about their concerns. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that the government cannot restrict speech simply because authorities disagree with the message or find the criticism uncomfortable.

A particularly important component of First Amendment protection involves the right to record government officials performing their duties in public. Numerous federal appellate courts have held that filming law enforcement is constitutionally protected. For example, in one case, the court held that a bystander had a clearly established right to videotape police officers arresting a man on the Boston Common. Similarly, in another case, the court reaffirmed that citizens have a First Amendment right to record police officers in public spaces.

 

[Totally Bored]

This is bullshit, but if it was true, then by your own logic all these Dems were way better at the thing that Trump claims to be his top priority...

what is the bullshit you're complaining about now ?

 

[Geo]

"Americans have a constitutional right to protest peacefully and a general right to photograph or film events, including the police, when lawfully present in public spaces.

They don't have the right to interfere in a law enforcement operation, regardless of how they do it.

Bob Weir loves granny panties.

 

[Floyd Eye]

Brutalizing your cock doesn't count.

Psshh. I wish they’d pay me for that.

 

[Geo]

 

[Geo]

@JDs Couch, I'll take a medium roast Starbucks Sunsera please.

The name is Weir, Bob Weir.

 

[Findthetone1]

Seems that you don't have a fucking clue.

"Americans have a constitutional right to protest peacefully and a general right to photograph or film events, including the poli

ce, when lawfully present in public spaces. These rights are protected primarily by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech, press, and assembly."

The First Amendment provides broad protection to individuals who want to express their views about immigration enforcement, including opposition to ICE activity. People have the constitutional right to participate in peaceful demonstrations in traditional public forums such as streets, parks, and sidewalks. They may chant slogans, hold signs, document law enforcement activity, and speak with other community members about their concerns. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that the government cannot restrict speech simply because authorities disagree with the message or find the criticism uncomfortable.

A particularly important component of First Amendment protection involves the right to record government officials performing their duties in public. Numerous federal appellate courts have held that filming law enforcement is constitutionally protected. For example, in one case, the court held that a bystander had a clearly established right to videotape police officers arresting a man on the Boston Common. Similarly, in another case, the court reaffirmed that citizens have a First Amendment right to record police officers in public spaces.

Sigh.....OK, I'll try.

"Americans have a constitutional right to protest peacefully

THIS is peacefully

THIS, is NOT peaceful

The First Amendment provides broad protection to individuals who want to express their views about immigration enforcement, including opposition to ICE activity. People have the constitutional right to participate in peaceful demonstrations in traditional public forums such as streets

Stop getting your legal advice from the glory hole stall walls you dumb fuck.
Civil Rights Law

Is It Illegal for Protesters to Block Roads?​

Blocking a road during a protest has significant legal implications. Understand the regulations that balance the right to assemble with public safety and order.

general right to photograph or film events, including the police

Film, not obstruct. Once you violate a zone deemed unsafe, it becomes a crime. Shoving a fucking camera 6 inches from a cop's face is way past that.

The problem with you limp wristers and overemotional sheeples is that you seem to think that the 1st Amendment means I can say what I want, where I want and when I want without any accountability or consequences. That may work in your land of unicorns and rainbows but it's far from real life.
Maybe try growing the fuck up.

To put in a simpler term, try walking around an airport or sitting on an airplane and repeatedly saying "bomb' out loud and cry "free speech". Then see what happens to your dumbass.

 

[Geo]

Sigh.....OK, I'll try.

THIS is peacefully
View attachment 429307
THIS, is NOT peaceful
View attachment 429308

Stop getting your legal advice from the glory hole stall walls you dumb fuck.
Civil Rights Law

Is It Illegal for Protesters to Block Roads?​

Blocking a road during a protest has significant legal implications. Understand the regulations that balance the right to assemble with public safety and order.

Film, not obstruct. Once you violate a zone deemed unsafe, it becomes a crime. Shoving a fucking camera 6 inches from a cop's face is way past that.

The problem with you limp wristers and overemotional sheeples is that you seem to think that the 1st Amendment means I can say what I want, where I want and when I want without any accountability or consequences. That may work in your land of unicorns and rainbows but it's far from real life.
Maybe try growing the fuck up.

To put in a simpler term, try walking around an airport or sitting on an airplane and repeatedly saying "bomb' out loud and cry "free speech". Then see what happens to your dumbass.

Leave him alone, he is busy getting my coffee.

Bob Weir gave me crabs.

 

[Findthetone1]

Leave him alone, he is busy getting my coffee.

Bob Weir gave me crabs.

I know. I don't even know why I wasted my time.

Bob QWeir gave the crabs herpes.

 

[JDs Couch]

Sigh.....OK, I'll try.

THIS is peacefully
View attachment 429307
THIS, is NOT peaceful
View attachment 429308

Stop getting your legal advice from the glory hole stall walls you dumb fuck.
Civil Rights Law

Is It Illegal for Protesters to Block Roads?​

Blocking a road during a protest has significant legal implications. Understand the regulations that balance the right to assemble with public safety and order.

Film, not obstruct. Once you violate a zone deemed unsafe, it becomes a crime. Shoving a fucking camera 6 inches from a cop's face is way past that.

The problem with you limp wristers and overemotional sheeples is that you seem to think that the 1st Amendment means I can say what I want, where I want and when I want without any accountability or consequences. That may work in your land of unicorns and rainbows but it's far from real life.
Maybe try growing the fuck up.

To put in a simpler term, try walking around an airport or sitting on an airplane and repeatedly saying "bomb' out loud and cry "free speech". Then see what happens to your dumbass.

Wow, post more AI fake photos, really proves your point. Dipshit.

 

[JDs Couch]

Sigh.....OK, I'll try.

THIS is peacefully
View attachment 429307
THIS, is NOT peaceful
View attachment 429308

Stop getting your legal advice from the glory hole stall walls you dumb fuck.
Civil Rights Law

Is It Illegal for Protesters to Block Roads?​

Blocking a road during a protest has significant legal implications. Understand the regulations that balance the right to assemble with public safety and order.

Film, not obstruct. Once you violate a zone deemed unsafe, it becomes a crime. Shoving a fucking camera 6 inches from a cop's face is way past that.

The problem with you limp wristers and overemotional sheeples is that you seem to think that the 1st Amendment means I can say what I want, where I want and when I want without any accountability or consequences. That may work in your land of unicorns and rainbows but it's far from real life.
Maybe try growing the fuck up.

To put in a simpler term, try walking around an airport or sitting on an airplane and repeatedly saying "bomb' out loud and cry "free speech". Then see what happens to your dumbass.

By your logic, these violent insurrectionists should have been mowed down with machine guns.

Such peace

 

[rsm]

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

J6, J6, J6!!!

 

[Monkey Man]

US.citizens are allowed to protest, observe law enforcement, record, and can say whatever they want under the First Amendment as long as it's not a direct threat of violence to an individual.

Correct.

Convenient, this, and quoting the constitution whilst ignoring the fact that they're interfering, which is a felony.

That's the bottom line mate. The second they interfere with proceedings, they're no longer "innocent".

 

[rsm]

Correct.

Convenient, this, and quoting the constitution whilst ignoring the fact that they're interfering, which is a felony.

That's the bottom line mate. The second they interfere with proceedings, they're no longer "innocent".

We should deport the libtards that interfere with ICE; let's ship them to New Zealand to keep JD's crotch company, they're his kind of people. They can live happily together!

 

[Monkey Man]

I'm sure any country with an "open borders" policy would be happy to accept them, like Aus, NZ, the UK, Canada...

 

[JDs Couch]

We should deport the libtards that interfere with ICE; let's ship them to New Zealand to keep JD's crotch company, there his kind of people. They can live happily together!

You can't deport citizens, sorry fascist.

 

[Monkey Man]

Fair point.