Zohran Mamdani Appreciation Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shevek
  • Start date Start date
Nothing wrong with "MAGA". It's a communist tactic to demonize political movements.

The fact that it annoys assholes like you is just a bonus.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN annoying assholes is definitely a BONUS! :ROFLMAO:

star-trek-star-trek-tos.gif
roar-breathe.gif
 
Nothing wrong with "MAGA". It's a communist tactic to demonize political movements.

The fact that it annoys assholes like you is just a bonus.
Run out of gifs? You should stick to them instead of using words you don't know like 'communist'.

I'm so far from annoyed at the word. I am laughing at YOU though. Dumbfuck loser.
 
I'm wondering what makes him qualified to even make such a distinction?
To him anyone who doesn't think Trump raped babies is maga.
Anyone who thinks Trump didn't force sex on underage girls is a pedophile protector.

Are YOU a pedophile protector or not. Yes or No is all the answer I need.

Tell me, ARE YOU A PEDO PROTECTOR?
 
@84superchamp

Who said you had to pick one or the other? Hmm?
 
Yes, I was there and saw it with my own eyes. Trump, a 12 year old, and lots of KY.

Even if ^that^ were included in a sworn testimony, you'd find a way to dis-believe it. I know there's nothing I can say that will convince you so I'm not going to bother.

But while we're on the subject, why is trump desperate enough to start a war to take eyes off the unreleased Epstein files. Those same files he promised to release? There can only be 1 reason. And it's probably because there's testimony in it that sounds a LOT like my first sentence in this post.
 
Yes, I was there and saw it with my own eyes. Trump, a 12 year old, and lots of KY.

Even if ^that^ were included in a sworn testimony, you'd find a way to dis-believe it. I know there's nothing I can say that will convince you so I'm not going to bother.

But while we're on the subject, why is trump desperate enough to start a war to take eyes off the unreleased Epstein files. Those same files he promised to release? There can only be 1 reason. And it's probably because there's testimony in it that sounds a LOT like my first sentence in this post.
You have no fucking idea what I believe and don't believe. YOU believe what confirms your bias. When and if he's arrested and prosecuted when out of office, then maybe the discussion can be had. I'm not looking for opinions or hearsay. If there is solid evidence of a crime on that level, then prosecution should take place. No matter the person. Words like probably don't hold up in court, skippy.
 
Back
Top