
JackTheBear
Well-known member
Well, maybe stop talking out of your ass, Baiter and you might learn something.
Cause you obviously have NO clue what the fuck you're taking about.
Shoulda seen his nonsense yesterday?
Lol
Well, maybe stop talking out of your ass, Baiter and you might learn something.
Cause you obviously have NO clue what the fuck you're taking about.
An analogy is what it is. Something is either a strong analogy, a weak analogy, or not analogous at all. Seatbelt = gun is a weak analogy.Here’s the thing:
The analogy isn’t
weapon :: seat belt
it is
personal defense readiness :: seat belt
the nut of the analogy is:
Preventing undesirable outcomes from unlikely but plausible adverse events
—-
Now, if you don’t agree with the analogy, that’s OK and I recognize your point about body armor
that does not mean the analogy itself is weak and tbh i don’t think there’s a lot of mileage to be got from continuing to assert that
I know what an analogy is. Moron. LolWell, maybe stop talking out of your ass, Baiter and you might learn something.
Cause you obviously have NO clue what the fuck you're taking about.
Cause you obviously have NO clue what the fuck you're taking about.
The analogy is weak or strong based on logic as a discipline.
How's that, Chuckles?Careful there kettle.....
I live in a constitutional carry state. The majority of people I encounter any given day has at least one gun in their vehicle. Not all of them should.It's also dependent on the type of gun owner each person is.
For every one responsible gun owner with proper training,
there's at least one other bozo packing - along with whatever crime might occur.
I've known way too many bozos over the years for the seat belt analogy to work well.
"Baiter. Helping prove my points since 2023"I know what an analogy is. Moron. Lol
Oh, no. There are NEVER improperly trained or irresponsible drivers....idiotIt's also dependent on the type of gun owner each person is.
For every one responsible gun owner with proper training,
there's at least one other bozo packing - along with whatever crime might occur.
I've known way too many bozos over the years for the seat belt analogy to work well.
So is it the vehicle now? Or still the seatbelt?Oh, no. There are NEVER improperly trained or irresponsible drivers....idiot
? ?![]()
? ?
There's that word salad! Keep it going, Baiter.So is it the vehicle now? Or still the seatbelt?
Sure. But these alleged irresponsible drivers, do they know how to use their seatbelts? Remember, it’s gun=seatbelt.There's that word salad! Keep it going, Baiter.
You got nothing
I have realistic and pratical understanding of the concept of preparedness. Which, contrary to what you and your twat voices want to think, is what my argument is about. I get it, the only concept of preparedness you understand is making sure you have enough tampons in your purse before you go clubbing. So I'll cut you some slack.And what is it that you think you have?
![]()
It REALLY is, when retards like this vote.christ, I didn’t really intend to provoke another pissing match with a casual comment about personal defense
it ain’t that serious yall, this is the damn internet
Sure is! What's your point, Baiter?Sure. But these alleged irresponsible drivers, do they know how to use their seatbelts? Remember, it’s gun=seatbelt.
My point is, you don’t know what constitutes a strong analogy. You may like the analogy, because it supports your view. But that doesn’t make it a strong analogy.Sure is! What's your point, Baiter?
You haven't proven that it's a weak analogy. Not in the context that it's being discussed. So maybe if you do..My point is, you don’t know what constitutes a strong analogy. You may like the analogy, because it supports your view. But that doesn’t make it a strong analogy.